iPhone/iPad 应用程序因订阅模式而被拒绝？
我们打算在 AppStore 上推出一款免费 iPhone/iPad 应用程序。 由于订阅模式（iPhone 应用程序中的登录/密码验证），这些内容实际上是可以访问的。
订阅（每月约 100 美元）是通过专用网络服务器处理的。 如果无需订阅即可使用，此应用程序将提供最小值。 有谁知道这种订阅模式会不会被苹果拒绝？
我知道有些应用程序遵循这个模型，但在开始这个方向之前我想听听您对此的想法。 感谢您的回答。
We intend to launch a free iPhone/iPad app on the AppStore.
The content will actually be accessible thanks to a subscription model (login/pwd authentication in iPhone app).
The subscription (about 100$ a month) is handled via a dedicated web server.
If used without subscription, this app will provide minimum value.
Does anyone know if this kind of subscription model can be rejected by Apple ?
I know some apps follow this model, but I'd like to have your thought on this before starting in this direction.
Thanks for your answer.
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（3）
据我所知，这很好——只要你的应用程序是免费的，并且你输入了它需要订阅任何服务的描述。当您提交应用程序时，您需要将测试帐户的详细信息移交给Apple，以便他们可以对其进行测试，但除此之外一点也不麻烦。
我知道有一款应用程序的功能与目前应用程序商店中的应用程序类似 - Spotify for iPhone。这是一款音乐播放应用程序，可从网络传输音乐 - 但您需要一个 Spotify 高级帐户。当您第一次打开应用程序时，您必须登录，如果您没有高级帐户，它只会告诉您不允许您登录！
This is fine AFAIK - As long your app is free and you put in the description that it requires a subscription to whichever service. When you submit the app, you'll need to hand over details to a test account to Apple so that they can test it, but other than that it's no hassle at all.
I know of an app which works just like that on the app store right now - Spotify for iPhone. It's a music playing app which streams music from the web - but you need a Spotify premium account. When you first open the app, you have to sign in, and if you don't have a premium account it just tells you that you're not allowed in!
有很多应用程序只有在我在某个地方有帐户的情况下才可以使用，而有些应用程序我必须为该帐户付费，因此，在不了解具体情况的情况下，没有什么可以立即排除您的订阅模式。甚至还有 Apple 应用程序，例如 iDisk，如果您没有 100 美元的 mobile me 订阅，这些应用程序就毫无用处。
如果存在问题，您可以考虑将订阅作为应用内购买出售（苹果将收取 30%，这应该会让他们感到高兴），或者考虑在不订阅的情况下使应用程序功能更强大。
无论哪种方式，在提交审批时，请确保设置一个苹果测试人员可以使用的完整订阅的示例帐户（提交中有空间用于包含此类登录信息）。
There are plenty of apps which only work if I have an account somewhere, and some for which I have to pay for that account so, without knowing the specifics, there is nothing which immediately rules out your subscription model. There are even Apple apps, iDisk for example, which are useless if you don't have a $100 mobile me subscription.
If there are issues you can look at selling your subscription as an in app purchase (apple will take their 30% which should make them happy) or look at making the app more functional without the subscription.
Either way, when submitting for approval make sure to set up a sample account with a full subscription that the apple testers can use (there is space in the submission for including logins for this kind of thing).
我们的应用程序之前已获得批准，但更新刚刚被拒绝，因为我们通过我们的网站销售订阅。 （我们已经这样做了 15 年，但没有给苹果 30% 的钱。）他们要求所有 iphone/ipad 内容的订阅都通过应用内购买。我想我们会考虑构建一个基于浏览器的应用程序。
干杯，
格里
Our app, previously approved, update was just rejected because we sell subscriptions through our website. (We have been doing this for 15 years, without giving Apple 30% of our money.) They are requiring that all subscriptions for iphone/ipad content go through in-app purchasing. I guess we will be looking at building a browser based app instead.
Cheers,
Gerry