有多少人真正使用 COM+/.NET EnterpriseServices?

发布于 2024-09-09 02:11:16 字数 473 浏览 8 评论 0原文

我正在学习 COM+ 和 EnterpriseServices。我发现了COM+ 服务的完整列表 在 MSDN 上并阅读其中的每一个。

这个数量之大令我惊叹不已。从表面上看,它似乎是一个其他开发平台无法比拟的非常先进的系统。诸如池化、同步和远程处理之类的概念似乎非常有用,并且他们已经标准化了一种实现方法。

另一方面,网上对 COM+/EnterpriseServices 的提及却出奇地少。当我在SO中输入标题时,几乎所有相关问题都有0个答案(希望这不会成为其中之一)。我有一种感觉,所有这些设施实际上主要是MS用来实现IIS的。但他们发布它是为了一些营销热议。

您有使用这些服务的真实经验吗?它们只是一些过度架构的麻烦,还是您有过它们变成实时节省者的经验?

I am learning about COM+ and EnterpriseServices. I came across the complete list of COM+ services on MSDN and read every one of them.

The sheer volume of this awed me. On the surface, it seems to be a really advanced system unmatched by other development platforms. Concepts like pooling, synchronization and remoting seem really useful and they've standardized a way to do it.

On the other hand, mentions of COM+/EnterpriseServices on the net is surprisingly scarce. When I typed the title here in SO, almost all the related questions have 0 answers (hopefully this won't become one of them). I have a feeling that all these facilities are in fact mainly used by MS to implement IIS. But they published it for some marketing buzz.

Do you have any real experience using these services? Are they just some over-architectured nuisance or did you have experience where they turned to be real time savers?

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论(2

鹿童谣 2024-09-16 02:11:16
  1. COM 服务不能穿过防火墙(SOAP 服务除外)。

  2. COM+ 主要为 Microsoft Visual C++ 设计和 Microsoft Visual Basic 开发人员

  3. COM+ 是一种较旧的技术(即,它不是本周的流行风格)。

此页面底部的链接 (链接到解释 COM+ 1.5 中新功能的视频)不再有效。

深入研究 COM 足够长的时间,您将偶然发现 .NET 接管 COM 世界的原因。

  1. COM services don't work through firewalls (except for the SOAP services).

  2. COM+ is designed primarily for Microsoft Visual C++ and Microsoft Visual Basic developers

  3. COM+ is an older technology (i.e. it is not the flavor of the week).

The link at the bottom of this page (linking to a video explaining the new features in COM+ 1.5) no longer works.

Dig into COM long enough, and you will stumble into the reasons .NET took over the COM world.

各自安好 2024-09-16 02:11:16

COM+ 服务有些过时,因为有更现代的方法可以完成 COM+ 的大部分功能。

另一方面,人们可以使用.NET 创建COM+ 服务,所以它还没有消亡。

顺便说一句,您为什么要学习 COM+?

COM+ services are somewhat dated, in the sense that there are more modern ways to do most of what COM+ does.

On the other hand, one can use .NET to create COM+ services, so it's not dead yet.

BTW, why are you learning about COM+?

~没有更多了~
我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
原文