JavaScript：公共方法和原型

Question

我不完全确定如何在 JS 中实现 OOP 概念。

我有一个在其构造函数中完全声明的类：

function AjaxList(settings)
{

    // all these vars are of dubious necessity... could probably just use `settings` directly
    var _jq_choice_selector = settings['choice_selector'];
    var _jq_chosen_list = settings['chosen_list'];
    var _cb_onRefresh = settings['on_refresh'];
    var _url_all_choices = settings['url_choices'];
    var _url_chosen = settings['url_chosen'];
    var _url_delete_format = settings['url_delete_format'];

    var jq_choice_selector_form = _jq_choice_selector.closest("form");
    if (DEBUG && jq_choice_selector_form.length != 1)
    {
        throw("There was an error selecting the form for the choice selector.");
    }

    function refresh()
    {
        _updateChoicesSelector();
        _updateChosenList();
        _cb_onRefresh();
    };

    AjaxList.prototype.refresh = refresh; // will this be called on all AjaxLists, or just the instance used to call it?
    // AjaxList.refresh = refresh; // will this be called on all AjaxLists, or just the instance used to call it?

    // ...
}

有多个 AjaxList 实例。当我对其中一个调用 refresh() 时，我只希望该列表自行刷新。在以下实例中：

term_list = AjaxList(settings);
term_list.refresh();

refresh() 调用似乎使所有 AjaxList 自行刷新。这样做的正确方法是什么？

我正在使用 jQuery，如果它有什么区别的话。

Answer 1

您不应该在构造函数中重新定义原型函数。
如果要创建特权函数，请在构造函数中使用 this.methodname = ... 。

function AjaxList() {
  var privateVar = 0;
  function privateFunction() {
    //...
  }
  //create a refresh function just for this instance of the AjaxList
  this.refresh = function() {
    //privileged function, it can access the 'privateVar & privateFunction'
    privateVar++;
  }
}
//public functions that don't need access to the private variables/functions
AjaxList.prototype.publicFunction=function() {

};

另外，如果你想创建一个合适的对象，你需要更改

term_list = AjaxList(settings);

为

term_list = new AjaxList(settings);

Answer 2

AjaxList = function(settings) {
    this._jq_choice_selector = settings["choice_selector"];
    this._jq_chosen_list = settings["chosen_list"];
    this._cb_onRefresh = settings["on_refresh"];
    this._url_all_choices = settings["url_choices"];
    this._url_chosen = settings["url_chosen"];
    this._url_delete_format = settings["url_delete_format"];

    this.jq_choice_selector_form = _jq_choice_selector.closest("form");
    if (DEBUG && jq_choice_selector_form.length != 1) {
        throw "There was an error selecting the form for the choice selector.";
    }
};

AjaxList.prototype = {
    _updateChoicesSelector: function() { },
    _updateChosenList: function() { },
    _cb_onRefresh: function() { },

    refresh: function() {
        this._updateChoicesSelector();
        this._updateChosenList();
        this._cb_onRefresh();
    }
};

鉴于该结构，您应该能够调用：

var ajaxList = new AjaxList(settings);
ajaxList.refresh(); // etc.

Answer 3

我正在使用 jQuery，如果它有的话
差异。

不，没有。在这里查看我的答案： Javascript、Jquery 和 Ajax 之间有什么区别？

我有一个完全是
在其构造函数中声明

Javascript 中没有类。忘记他们吧。您确实需要学习该语言的一些基础知识才能使用它们。它不是 Java，尽管它看起来很相似。

如果您有构造函数，它将创建一个实例。 共享方法将位于原型链中，并且只有特定于实例的数据才直接进入具有这个关键字。

因此，对象的基本概念如下所示：

// constructor of an instance
function MyObject( param1, param2 ) {
  this.param1 = param1;
  this.param2 = param2;
  this.param3 = 32;
  return this; // [optional]
}

// Public methods can be called by any instance.
// Instances share their prototype object.
// The this keyword always points to the current
// instance that calls the method.
MyObject.prototype.sum = function() {
  return this.param1 + this.param2 + this.param3;
}

// refresh should be a shared method, since it
// does the same thing on every instance
MyObject.prototype.refresh = function() {
  // do the refresh
  // ...
}

这个概念的力量在于内存中只有一个刷新函数。它可以处理任何情况。此外，如果另一个对象继承自MyObject，则刷新功能将被继承。但内存中仍然会有一个共享刷新功能。它可以处理任何父实例或子实例。