创建 FUSE 实现时建议使用哪种垃圾收集语言
我想在 Linux 和 Mac OS X 下使用 FUSE 实现虚拟文件系统。我主要使用 Java 和 .NET/C#，但也熟悉 Python，并用 Python 编写小型实用程序/shell 脚本。如果可能的话，我会尽量避免使用 C/C++ 编写，主要是因为团队缺乏经验。
我从 FUSE 绑定网站 看到有很多绑定对于不同的语言，但我不确定哪一种是最成熟的。我周围有一个开发团队，他们也主要从事 Java 和 C# 工作。最重要的是，环境必须实现常见的加密算法，例如 Rijndael/AES 和 RSA。
我考虑过 Mono，因为我们已经有很多 C# 客户端代码，但绑定已经有一段时间没有更新了，我有点担心在 Mac OS X 上部署 Mono。Python 是一个选项，但尽管我知道，但团队不太习惯 Python 语法。 Java 是一种选择，但我担心绑定似乎是分叉而没有太大进展。
我考虑的最后一个选项是 Vala ，它有 FUSE 绑定，但缺少文档和示例。我知道 Vala 不是一种垃圾收集语言，但我仍然认为它是一种选择。不确定在 Mac OS X 上部署 GObject 有多容易。
I would like to implement a virtual filesystem using FUSE under Linux and Mac OS X. I have mainly worked in Java and .NET/C#, but also familiar with Python and do write small utilities/shell scripts in Python. Writing is C/C++ is something that I would try to avoid if possible mainly because of lack of experience in the team.
I see from the FUSE bindings site that there are many binding towards different languages, but I'm not sure which one is the most mature. I have a development team around me which also have worked most in Java and C#. On top of that, the environment must have implementations of common cryptographic algorithm such as Rijndael/AES and RSA.
I've considered Mono since we have a lot of client code in C# already, but the binding haven't been updated for a while and I'm a bit concerned about deploying Mono on Mac OS X. Python is an option, but the team isn't too used to Python syntax although I know it. Java is an option, but I concerned about the bindings which seems to be forked without to much progress.
A last option which I have considered is Vala which has FUSE binding, but the documentation and examples are missing. I know that Vala isn't a garbage collected language, but I still consider it an option. Not sure how easy it is to deploy GObject on Mac OS X.
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（1）
我也在开发fuse fs。我正在使用Python。对我来说，它比某些静态类型语言（c# 或 java）更好，因为调试熔丝文件系统存在问题。您无权访问 stdin/stdout/stderr，因此安装后您甚至看不到异常。 Python 是动态的，并且更容易通过其中的回溯、异常、执行帧等进行操作。
I am also developing fuse fs. I am using python. As for me it is better for this purpose than some static typed language (c# or java) because there is problems with debugging fuse filesystems. You don't have access to stdin/stdout/stderr therefore after mounting you can't see even exceptions. Python is dynamic and it is easier manipulate with tracebacks, exceptions, execution frames, etc in it.