They have good experience with MS Windows and SQL Server
They have no experience in *nix administration
Conclusion
Forget it. Even if you found prove that Linux+MySQL is more stable or more performant, then there would still be enough good arguments to not change the environment.
好吧，现在我认为这不再是稳定性的问题了——这种争论是 Linux 的一个重要的营销策略。最大的区别是 Windows + SQL Server 不是免费的，而且实际上相当昂贵。
我认为你最好的选择是在一台机器上安装 Ubuntu，让他们尝试一下，看看他们是否喜欢它。
但你最大的论点是价格......
我确实同情你 - 我不是微软的粉丝，并且同意 Linux + MySQL 更好，但就像其他人所说的那样，他们已经习惯了他们所拥有的东西，所以很难说服他们否则。
另外，不知道这家公司有多大，但如果大的话，他们就不会在意省下来的钱……
Well, nowadays I don't think it's about stability anymore - that argument was a big marketing tactic for Linux. The biggest difference is the fact that Windows + SQL Server is not free, and actually quite expensive.
I think your best option would be to get Ubuntu installed on a machine and let them have a play with it and see how they like it.
But your biggest argument would be price...
And I do sympathise with you - I'm not a fan of Microsoft, and agree that going Linux + MySQL is better, but like others said, they are already used to what they have, so it'll be hard to convince them otherwise.
Also, not sure how big this company is, but if it's big, then they won't care about the money saved...
发布评论
评论（3）
事实
结论
算了。即使您发现证明 Linux+MySQL 更稳定或更高性能，那么仍然有足够好的理由不改变环境。
Facts
Conclusion
Forget it. Even if you found prove that Linux+MySQL is more stable or more performant, then there would still be enough good arguments to not change the environment.
您首先需要说服自己:)
请阅读此处 https://web.archive.org/web/1/http://articles.techrepublic%2ecom%2ecom/5100-10878_11-1054385.html
You first need to convince yourself :)
Have a read here https://web.archive.org/web/1/http://articles.techrepublic%2ecom%2ecom/5100-10878_11-1054385.html
好吧，现在我认为这不再是稳定性的问题了——这种争论是 Linux 的一个重要的营销策略。最大的区别是 Windows + SQL Server 不是免费的，而且实际上相当昂贵。
我认为你最好的选择是在一台机器上安装 Ubuntu，让他们尝试一下，看看他们是否喜欢它。
但你最大的论点是价格......
我确实同情你 - 我不是微软的粉丝，并且同意 Linux + MySQL 更好，但就像其他人所说的那样，他们已经习惯了他们所拥有的东西，所以很难说服他们否则。
另外，不知道这家公司有多大，但如果大的话，他们就不会在意省下来的钱……
Well, nowadays I don't think it's about stability anymore - that argument was a big marketing tactic for Linux. The biggest difference is the fact that Windows + SQL Server is not free, and actually quite expensive.
I think your best option would be to get Ubuntu installed on a machine and let them have a play with it and see how they like it.
But your biggest argument would be price...
And I do sympathise with you - I'm not a fan of Microsoft, and agree that going Linux + MySQL is better, but like others said, they are already used to what they have, so it'll be hard to convince them otherwise.
Also, not sure how big this company is, but if it's big, then they won't care about the money saved...