我可以同时运行的异步 urlfetch 调用数量是否有限制?
我注意到 Java 实现中 urlfetch 的同时异步调用似乎存在限制(如下所述:http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/urlfetch/overview.html)
,但不在 Python 文档中:
http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/python/urlfetch/asynchronousrequests.html
所以python 版本的 async urlfetch 是否也有 10 的上限,只是没有记录(或在其他地方记录)?或者限制是其他的东西(或者不存在)?
I noticed what appears to be a limit on simultaneous asynchronous calls of urlfetch in the Java implementation (as noted here: http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/java/urlfetch/overview.html)
but not in the python documentation:
http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/python/urlfetch/asynchronousrequests.html
So is it the case that the python version of async urlfetch also has an upper limit of 10 and it's just not documented (or documented elsewhere)? Or is the limit something else (or non-existant)?
如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱,如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论,将不能在第一时间通知您!
发布评论
评论(2)
Python 的限制并未记录在该页面中,而是记录在另一个页面< /a>,其中显示(在 本节):
如您所见,这与 Java 的限制相同。
The limit for Python is just not documented in that page but in another one, which says (in the middle of the last paragraph of this section):
As you see, that's the same limit as for Java.
嗯 - 对于非计费应用程序来说可能是这样,但在计费应用程序中尝试一下:
它只是有效......所以计费应用程序的限制实际上更高(但没有记录!)
umm - that may be true for non-billable apps, but try this in a billable app:
It just works... So the limit for billable apps is in fact higher (but isn't documented!)