C# 中的 StreamReader 和缓冲区

发布于 2024-09-07 19:17:46 字数 689 浏览 5 评论 0原文

我对 StreamReader 的缓冲区使用有疑问。 此处:http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us /library/system.io.streamreader.aspx 可以看到:

“从流读取时,使用与流的内部缓冲区大小相同的缓冲区会更有效。”。

根据这个 weblog ,内部缓冲区大小StreamReader 的大小为 2k,因此我可以使用 Read() 有效地读取一些 kbs 的文件,避免使用 Read(Char[], Int32, Int32)

此外,即使文件很大,我也可以构造 StreamReader 传递 buffer

那么为什么需要外部缓冲区呢?

I've a question about buffer usage with StreamReader.
Here: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.io.streamreader.aspx you can see:

"When reading from a Stream, it is more efficient to use a buffer that is the same size as the internal buffer of the stream.".

According to this weblog , the internal buffer size of a StreamReader is 2k, so I can efficiently read a file of some kbs using the Read() avoiding the Read(Char[], Int32, Int32).

Moreover, even if a file is big I can construct the StreamReader passing a size for the buffer

So what's the need of an external buffer?

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论(2

我做我的改变 2024-09-14 19:17:46

查看 StreamReader.Read 方法的实现,您可以看到它们都调用内部的 ReadBuffer 方法。

Read() 方法首先读入内部缓冲区,然后逐个读取缓冲区。

public override int Read()
{
    if ((this.charPos == this.charLen) && (this.ReadBuffer() == 0))
    {
        return -1;
    }
    int num = this.charBuffer[this.charPos];
    this.charPos++;
    return num;
}

Read(char[]...) 也调用 ReadBuffer ,而是调用调用者提供的外部缓冲区:

public override int Read([In, Out] char[] buffer, int index, int count)
{
    while (count > 0)
    {
        ...
        num2 = this.ReadBuffer(buffer, index + num, count, out readToUserBuffer);
        ...
        count -= num2;
    }
}

所以我想唯一的性能损失是你需要调用 Read() 的次数比 Read(char[]) 的次数多得多,并且由于它是虚拟方法,调用本身会减慢速度。

Looking at the implementation of StreamReader.Read methods, you can see they both call internal ReadBuffer method.

Read() method first reads into internal buffer, then advances on the buffer one by one.

public override int Read()
{
    if ((this.charPos == this.charLen) && (this.ReadBuffer() == 0))
    {
        return -1;
    }
    int num = this.charBuffer[this.charPos];
    this.charPos++;
    return num;
}

Read(char[]...) calls the ReadBuffer too, but instead into the external buffer provided by caller:

public override int Read([In, Out] char[] buffer, int index, int count)
{
    while (count > 0)
    {
        ...
        num2 = this.ReadBuffer(buffer, index + num, count, out readToUserBuffer);
        ...
        count -= num2;
    }
}

So I guess the only performance loss is that you need to call Read() much more times than Read(char[]) and as it is a virtual method, the calls themselves slow it down.

╰つ倒转 2024-09-14 19:17:46

我认为这个问题已经在 stackoverflow 上以不同的方式提出: .net中如何将一个流的内容写入另一个流?

“使用Read方法时,使用与内部缓冲区大小相同的缓冲区会更有效流,其中内部缓冲区设置为所需的块大小,并且始终读取小于块大小的数据。如果在构造流时未指定内部缓冲区的大小,则其默认大小为 4 KB(4096 字节)。 ”。

I think this question was already asked somehow differently on stackoverflow: How to write the content of one stream into another stream in .net?

"When using the Read method, it is more efficient to use a buffer that is the same size as the internal buffer of the stream, where the internal buffer is set to your desired block size, and to always read less than the block size. If the size of the internal buffer was unspecified when the stream was constructed, its default size is 4 kilobytes (4096 bytes)."

~没有更多了~
我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
原文