GPFS 是值得考虑的。它是 IBM 专有的，但确实具有非常好的可扩展性，是一个成熟的网络文件系统，并且具有良好的 Windows 支持。 NTFS ACL 被保留，但将它们映射到 NFSv4 ACL，效果非常好（只要您不要在尝试使用 POSIX 权限时大惊小怪；chmod 会破坏您的 NFSv4 ACL。）
Lustre 值得一提，但Windows支持通常被认为很差并且是绿色的。
GPFS is a worthy consideration. It is IBM proprietary, but does have very good scalability, is a full-fledged network file system, and has decent Windows support. NTFS ACLs are preserved, though mapping them to NFSv4 ACLs, which works quite well (so long as you don't shoot your foot off trying to use POSIX permissions as well; chmod will blow away your NFSv4 ACLs.)
Lustre is worth a mention, but Windows support is generally considered very poor and green.
它允许您在基于商品的机器（Linux 或 Windows）中使用驱动器，并将它们显示为可通过基于 REST 的 API 访问的单个命名空间。当您将文件写入系统时，您可以定义要保存的副本数量。因此，如果分布式系统中有 5 台计算机，您可以指定将文件保存在 2 台或 3 台（或 N 台）计算机上以实现冗余。如果机器/硬盘驱动器崩溃，这不是问题，因为其他机器保存了这些文件的副本。
查看下载和社区链接以获取试用版以及文档。
You might want to check out CloudIQ Storage from Appistry. (They have closed shop.)
It allows you to take the drives in commodity based machines (linux or windows) and have them appear as a single namespace accessible via a REST based API. When you write files to the system, you can define the number of copies you want saved. So if you had 5 machines in your distributed system, you could specify that a file be saved on 2 or 3 (or N) machines for redundancy. If a machine/hard drive crashes, its not an issue, because other machines hold copies of those files.
Check out the Downloads and Community links for a trial version as well as documentation.
发布评论
评论（5）
有 来自 Microsoft 的 DFS 本身，它是在 Windows Server 中（我不知道是好是坏）
There is DFS from Microsoft itself, it's in Windows Server (if it's good or bad I don't know)
GPFS 是值得考虑的。它是 IBM 专有的，但确实具有非常好的可扩展性，是一个成熟的网络文件系统，并且具有良好的 Windows 支持。 NTFS ACL 被保留，但将它们映射到 NFSv4 ACL，效果非常好（只要您不要在尝试使用 POSIX 权限时大惊小怪；chmod 会破坏您的 NFSv4 ACL。）
Lustre 值得一提，但Windows支持通常被认为很差并且是绿色的。
GPFS is a worthy consideration. It is IBM proprietary, but does have very good scalability, is a full-fledged network file system, and has decent Windows support. NTFS ACLs are preserved, though mapping them to NFSv4 ACLs, which works quite well (so long as you don't shoot your foot off trying to use POSIX permissions as well; chmod will blow away your NFSv4 ACLs.)
Lustre is worth a mention, but Windows support is generally considered very poor and green.
您可能想查看 Appistry 的 CloudIQ Storage。（他们已经关门了。）
它允许您在基于商品的机器（Linux 或 Windows）中使用驱动器，并将它们显示为可通过基于 REST 的 API 访问的单个命名空间。当您将文件写入系统时，您可以定义要保存的副本数量。因此，如果分布式系统中有 5 台计算机，您可以指定将文件保存在 2 台或 3 台（或 N 台）计算机上以实现冗余。如果机器/硬盘驱动器崩溃，这不是问题，因为其他机器保存了这些文件的副本。
查看下载和社区链接以获取试用版以及文档。
You might want to check out CloudIQ Storage from Appistry.(They have closed shop.)
It allows you to take the drives in commodity based machines (linux or windows) and have them appear as a single namespace accessible via a REST based API. When you write files to the system, you can define the number of copies you want saved. So if you had 5 machines in your distributed system, you could specify that a file be saved on 2 or 3 (or N) machines for redundancy. If a machine/hard drive crashes, its not an issue, because other machines hold copies of those files.
Check out the Downloads and Community links for a trial version as well as documentation.
微软有类似Azure的东西，但我还没有更多地了解他们的解决方案。
Microsoft has something like Azure, but I have not learned more about their solution.
OpenAFS 是另一种在 Windows 上运行的 DFS 解决方案。
OpenAFS is another DFS solution that runs on Windows.