您在 s3 中使用哪些视频编码器服务？
我们使用的是免费的 FFmpeg。当发生破坏系统的错误时，以前的开发人员安装了 PandaStream。
我的问题是，您推荐什么优质视频编码器？
最好坚持使用 ffmpeg 并保持免费，还是小型网站真的需要像 Panda 这样的重型服务？
We were using FFmpeg which is free. And when a bug occurred that broke the system, a previous developer installed PandaStream.
My question is, what do you recommend for quality video encoders?
Is it best to stick with ffmpeg and keep it free, or does a small website really need a heavy duty service like Panda?
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（1）
FFmpeg 和 MEncoder 都是优质的 FOSS 编码器。
如果您遇到编码问题（回复：您的错误），可能值得查看它们的配置，甚至可能是输出编解码器并通过这种方式进行工作。如果您有远程系统的本地镜像，这可能会有所帮助，这样您就可以比在远程服务器上运行它更快地测试各种配置。
如果 Panda 不使用 mencoder 或 ffmpeg 之类的工具来进行编码，我会感到非常惊讶。
第三种服务（尤其是视频编码之类的服务）的明显优势是它可以减轻服务器的全部热量。对视频进行编码是一项非常繁重的任务。
也就是说，按照 Panda 收费的价格，您可以使用几台 VPS 机器轻松构建一个小型渲染农场
编辑：Panda 甚至发布 他们的 ffmpeg 配置，所以抓住他们的一个可能是一个主意。
FFmpeg and MEncoder are both good quality FOSS encoders.
If you've got problems with the encoding (re: your bug) at might be worth having a look at their configuration, perhaps even the output codec and working it through that way. It might help if you have a local mirror of your remote system so you can test various configurations quicker than if you were running it on the remote server.
I would be quite surprised if Panda weren't using a tool like mencoder or ffmpeg to do their encodes.
The obvious advantage of a third service (especially for something like video encoding) is it takes a whole load of the heat off your server. Encoding video is a seriously heavy task.
That said, with the prices Panda charge, you could easily build a little render farm using a couple of VPS machines
Edit: Panda even post their ffmpeg config so it might be an idea to just nab one of theirs.