Java ThreadPoolExecutor 在使用 ArrayBlockingQueue 时卡住
我正在开发一些应用程序并使用 ThreadPoolExecutor 来处理各种任务。 ThreadPoolExecutor 在持续一段时间后就会卡住。为了在更简单的环境中模拟这一点,我编写了一个简单的代码,可以在其中模拟该问题。
import java.util.concurrent.ArrayBlockingQueue;
import java.util.concurrent.RejectedExecutionHandler;
import java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor;
import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit;
public class MyThreadPoolExecutor {
private int poolSize = 10;
private int maxPoolSize = 50;
private long keepAliveTime = 10;
private ThreadPoolExecutor threadPool = null;
private final ArrayBlockingQueue<Runnable> queue = new ArrayBlockingQueue<Runnable>(
100000);
public MyThreadPoolExecutor() {
threadPool = new ThreadPoolExecutor(poolSize, maxPoolSize,
keepAliveTime, TimeUnit.SECONDS, queue);
threadPool.setRejectedExecutionHandler(new RejectedExecutionHandler() {
@Override
public void rejectedExecution(Runnable runnable,
ThreadPoolExecutor threadPoolExecutor) {
System.out
.println("Execution rejected. Please try restarting the application.");
}
});
}
public void runTask(Runnable task) {
threadPool.execute(task);
}
public void shutDown() {
threadPool.shutdownNow();
}
public ThreadPoolExecutor getThreadPool() {
return threadPool;
}
public void setThreadPool(ThreadPoolExecutor threadPool) {
this.threadPool = threadPool;
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
MyThreadPoolExecutor mtpe = new MyThreadPoolExecutor();
for (int i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
final int j = i;
mtpe.runTask(new Runnable() {
@Override
public void run() {
System.out.println(j);
}
});
}
}
}
尝试执行此代码几次。它通常会在控制台上打印出数字,当所有线程结束时,它就存在。但有时,它完成了所有任务,然后没有被终止。线程转储如下:
MyThreadPoolExecutor [Java Application]
MyThreadPoolExecutor at localhost:2619 (Suspended)
Daemon System Thread [Attach Listener] (Suspended)
Daemon System Thread [Signal Dispatcher] (Suspended)
Daemon System Thread [Finalizer] (Suspended)
Object.wait(long) line: not available [native method]
ReferenceQueue<T>.remove(long) line: not available
ReferenceQueue<T>.remove() line: not available
Finalizer$FinalizerThread.run() line: not available
Daemon System Thread [Reference Handler] (Suspended)
Object.wait(long) line: not available [native method]
Reference$Lock(Object).wait() line: 485
Reference$ReferenceHandler.run() line: not available
Thread [pool-1-thread-1] (Suspended)
Unsafe.park(boolean, long) line: not available [native method]
LockSupport.park(Object) line: not available
AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await() line: not available
ArrayBlockingQueue<E>.take() line: not available
ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask() line: not available
ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run() line: not available
Thread.run() line: not available
Thread [pool-1-thread-2] (Suspended)
Unsafe.park(boolean, long) line: not available [native method]
LockSupport.park(Object) line: not available
AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await() line: not available
ArrayBlockingQueue<E>.take() line: not available
ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask() line: not available
ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run() line: not available
Thread.run() line: not available
Thread [pool-1-thread-3] (Suspended)
Unsafe.park(boolean, long) line: not available [native method]
LockSupport.park(Object) line: not available
AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await() line: not available
ArrayBlockingQueue<E>.take() line: not available
ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask() line: not available
ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run() line: not available
Thread.run() line: not available
Thread [pool-1-thread-4] (Suspended)
Unsafe.park(boolean, long) line: not available [native method]
LockSupport.park(Object) line: not available
AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await() line: not available
ArrayBlockingQueue<E>.take() line: not available
ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask() line: not available
ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run() line: not available
Thread.run() line: not available
Thread [pool-1-thread-6] (Suspended)
Unsafe.park(boolean, long) line: not available [native method]
LockSupport.park(Object) line: not available
AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await() line: not available
ArrayBlockingQueue<E>.take() line: not available
ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask() line: not available
ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run() line: not available
Thread.run() line: not available
Thread [pool-1-thread-8] (Suspended)
Unsafe.park(boolean, long) line: not available [native method]
LockSupport.park(Object) line: not available
AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await() line: not available
ArrayBlockingQueue<E>.take() line: not available
ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask() line: not available
ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run() line: not available
Thread.run() line: not available
Thread [pool-1-thread-5] (Suspended)
Unsafe.park(boolean, long) line: not available [native method]
LockSupport.park(Object) line: not available
AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await() line: not available
ArrayBlockingQueue<E>.take() line: not available
ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask() line: not available
ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run() line: not available
Thread.run() line: not available
Thread [pool-1-thread-10] (Suspended)
Unsafe.park(boolean, long) line: not available [native method]
LockSupport.park(Object) line: not available
AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await() line: not available
ArrayBlockingQueue<E>.take() line: not available
ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask() line: not available
ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run() line: not available
Thread.run() line: not available
Thread [pool-1-thread-9] (Suspended)
Unsafe.park(boolean, long) line: not available [native method]
LockSupport.park(Object) line: not available
AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await() line: not available
ArrayBlockingQueue<E>.take() line: not available
ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask() line: not available
ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run() line: not available
Thread.run() line: not available
Thread [pool-1-thread-7] (Suspended)
Unsafe.park(boolean, long) line: not available [native method]
LockSupport.park(Object) line: not available
AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await() line: not available
ArrayBlockingQueue<E>.take() line: not available
ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask() line: not available
ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run() line: not available
Thread.run() line: not available
Thread [DestroyJavaVM] (Suspended)
C:\Program Files\Java\jre1.6.0_07\bin\javaw.exe (Jun 17, 2010 10:42:33 AM)
在我的实际应用程序中,ThreadPoolExecutor 线程进入这种状态,然后停止响应。
问候, 拉维·拉奥
如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱,如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论,将不能在第一时间通知您!
发布评论
评论(1)
在您的
main
方法中,您永远不会调用mtpe.shutdown()
。 ThreadPoolExecutor 将尝试保留其corePoolSize
无限期地存活。有时,您很幸运,有多个corePoolSize
线程处于活动状态,因此每个工作线程都会进入条件逻辑分支,允许其在指定的 10 秒超时期限后终止。但是,正如您所注意到的,有时情况并非如此,因此执行器中的每个线程都会阻塞 ArrayBlockingQueue.take() 并等待新任务。另外,请注意, ExecutorService.shutdown() 和 ExecutorService.shutdownNow()。如果您按照包装器实现的指示调用 ExecutorService.shutdownNow(),您有时会删除一些尚未分配执行的任务。
更新:自从我最初的回答以来,
ThreadPoolExecutor
实现已经改变,使得原始帖子中的程序永远不应该退出。In your
main
method, you never callmtpe.shutdown()
. A ThreadPoolExecutor will attempt to keep itscorePoolSize
alive indefinitely. Sometimes, you get lucky and you have more thancorePoolSize
threads alive, so every worker thread will go into a conditional logic branch that allows it to terminate after your specified timeout period of 10 seconds. However, as you have noticed, sometimes this is not the case so every thread in the executor will block on ArrayBlockingQueue.take() and wait for a new task.Also, please note, there is a significant difference between ExecutorService.shutdown() and ExecutorService.shutdownNow(). If you call ExecutorService.shutdownNow() as your wrapper implementation indicates, you will on occasion drop some tasks which have not been assigned for execution.
Update: Since my original answer, the
ThreadPoolExecutor
implementation has changed such that the program in the original post should never exit.