如何在运行时填充本体？
我有一个配置文件，其中包含大量数据，例如传感器位置、类型、激活设备的规则等。基本上与普及系统相关。我计划为这个领域设计一个本体。我心中的疑问是我应该如何使用配置文件中的信息填充本体，因为配置文件会时不时地发生变化。早些时候，我计划使用 XML，因此我可以在运行时读取配置文件并根据 XSD 创建 XML。我们对本体使用相同的技术吗？如果是，那么填充本体的格式是什么？
谢谢 陈
I have a configuration file with a lot of data like sensor locations, type, rules for activating devices etc. Basically related to a pervasive system. I plan to design an ontology for this domain. The doubt in my mind is how should I populate the ontology with the information in the configuration file, as the configuration files are going to change every now and then. Earlier I was planning to use XML, so I can just read the configuration file at runtime and create an XML as per the XSD. Do we use the same technique for Ontologies? If yes then what is the format of the populated ontology?
Thanks
Chan
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（1）
我不完全确定你的意思，但听起来很像你的配置文件包含很多本体以及你打算用它做什么。
听起来好像概念（传感器名称、位置、类型）及其规则都在配置文件中。根据手头的推理/建模任务，您应该选择具有必要表达能力的形式主义。变化的问题是本体论的演化。
正如您所指出的，您可以将 XML 读入本体形式，例如 Common Logic 或 OWL，然后进行推理/查询等。
另外，您还应该尝试在这里发布您的问题：
http://ontolog.cim3.net/
I'm not entirely sure what you mean, but it sounds a lot like your configuration files contains a lot of your ontology and what you plan to do with it.
It roughly sounds as though the concepts (sensor names, locations, types) and their rules are all in the config file. Depending on the reasoning / modeling task at hand, you should pick a formalism that has the requisite expressivity. The question of changes is ontology evolution.
As you noted, you could read from XML into an ontology formalism like Common Logic or OWL, and then reason / query etc. there.
Also, you should also try posting your question here:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/