sIFR 项目死了吗？
我需要实现一个排版解决方案，并打算走 sIFR 路线，但 sIFR 2 很古老，而 sIFR 3 似乎已经有一年半多没有开发了。
我一直在研究 @font-face 方法，但我很确定我需要使用的字体不允许网络嵌入。
I need to implement a typographic solution, and was about to go the sIFR route, but sIFR 2 is ancient and sIFR 3 doesn't appear to have been worked on in over a year and a half.
I've been looking into the @font-face method, but I'm pretty sure that the fonts I need to use do not allow web embedding.
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（5）
另一种选择，更容易（imo）使用： http://cufon.shoqolate.com/generate/ 并且 100% 基于 JavaScript。
Another alternative, easier (imo) to use: http://cufon.shoqolate.com/generate/ and is 100% JavaScript based.
事实是，我对开发感到厌倦，开始忙于其他事情，适当的网络字体开始变得可行。在这一点上，我看不到自己回去改善 sIFR，这没有意义。
它从未正式完成的原因是仍有工作要做，尽管不是非常关键的工作。然而，在 19 个月后才让 r436 正式上市就有点愚蠢了。
Truth is, I got bored with development, got busy with other things, and proper web fonts started becoming feasible. At this point I can't see myself going back and improving sIFR, there's just no point to it.
The reason it was never officially completed is that there was still work left to do, albeit not very critical work. However to make r436 official 19 months after the fact would be a bit silly.
也许真的已经“完成”了。有些项目只是达到了一个点，没有什么可以添加的，因为它们完全实现了目标。这种情况非常罕见，但 sIFR 的目标非常简洁，而且没有什么需要增强的。我知道的还有另外 2 个项目：MTASC 和 AMFPHP。开发已停止，因为没有什么可做的，除非您想改变项目的性质。
问候
后退2dos
Maybe it's actually "completed". Some projects simply reach a point, where there's nothing really left to add, because they completely fullfill their goals. This is very rare, but sIFR has a very concise objective, and there's not really anything left to enhance. There are 2 other projects I know of: MTASC and AMFPHP. Developement is discontinued, because there's nothing left to do, unless you want to change the nature of the project.
greetz
back2dos
我想随着 CSS3 字体的出现，它不再需要了。
如果许可是您的问题，恐怕 sIFR 与 CSS3 字体有非常相似的问题。我建议查看 http://typekit.com 以获得良好的网络可访问字体。
I guess with the advent of CSS3 fonts it isn't needed that much any more.
If licensing is your issue, I'm afraid sIFR has quite similar issues as CSS3 fonts. I suggest checking out http://typekit.com for good web accessible fonts.
我们的朋友 Google 提供了另一个有趣的全新选项：http://code.google.com/apis/webfonts /
Another interesting option brand new from our friend Google: http://code.google.com/apis/webfonts/