衡量开发平台效率
我们正在开发一个应用程序，它是一种用于开发业务线应用程序的开发工具。我们当前构建的应用程序是 Windows 桌面客户端，但我们正在研究针对 silverlight/云类型的应用程序。
我们正在寻找一种“标准”方法来衡量构建中型到大型复杂性应用程序的时间。 “简单”的方法是构建应用程序的两个版本，一个使用“标准”工具，如 VS 和组件，另一个使用我们的平台，但我正在寻找一种更有效的方法来测量较小的零件，并且仍然可以能够获得一些有用的指标，了解使用我们的产品可以节省多少时间。
你们有什么建议供我查看、测试什么等吗？
We are devloping an application that is a kind of development tool for developing Line Of Buisness applications. The current applications that we build are windows desktop clients but we are looking into also targeting silverlight / cloud kind of applications.
What we are looking for is a "standard" way of measuring the time to build an application of medium to large complexity. The "easy" way would be to build two versions of an application, one using "standard" tools, like VS and components, and one using our platform, but I'm looking for a more efficient way to measure smaller parts and still be able to get some useful metrics of how much time could be saved using our product.
Do you guys have any pointers for me to look at, and what to test etc?
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（1）
一切可以计算的东西都是潜在的衡量标准。 LOC、类、组件、依赖项等。
您专门询问“时间度量”，但没有实际测量时间。好吧，如果您要记录时间，那么测量时间是唯一的方法。如果您想估计或预测您认为将花费的时间，那么您可以使用一些预测工具。 COCOMO 模型可能是最著名的模型。该模型使用 LOC 作为基本输入，以及一些附加校准参数，例如复杂性、系统类型、人员经验和历史校准。
原始模型经过重新设计（本质上包括更多参数）并被称为 COCOMO II。最初的模型更名为COCOMO 81（Boehm于1981年发布了第一个模型）。
如果您用 google 搜索 COCOMO，您会发现很多信息。
维基百科文章可能是最先点击的文章之一： http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COCOMO< /a>
Everything that can be counted is a potential mesure. LOC, classes, components, dependencies etc, etc.
You specifically ask about "time measure" withouth actually masuring the time. Well, if you are going to document the time, then measuring the time is the only way to go. If you want to estimate or predict the time you think will be spent, then you could use some prediction tool. The COCOMO model is perhaps the best known model. This model uses LOC as the essential input, and some additional calibration parameters, like complexity, type of system, personell experience and historical calibration.
The original model has been redesigned (essentially including more parameters) and is refered to as COCOMO II. And the original model is renamed to COCOMO 81 (Boehm published the first model in 1981).
You'll find a lot of info if you google COCOMO.
The Wikipedia article is probably one of the first hits: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COCOMO