Java:如何快速复制 BufferedImage 的像素? (包括单元测试)

发布于 2024-09-01 17:57:25 字数 2944 浏览 2 评论 0原文

我想要将源 BufferedImage 中的 ARGB 值(矩形区域)复制到目标 BufferedImage 中。不应进行合成:如果我复制 ARGB 值为 0x8000BE50(alpha 值为 128)的像素,则目标像素必须完全 0x8000BE50,完全覆盖目标像素。

我有一个非常精确的问题,我做了一个单元测试来展示我需要什么。单元测试功能齐全且独立,并且通过良好,并且正在做我想要的事情。

但是,我想要一个更快且内存效率更高的方法来替换copySrcIntoDstAt(...)。

这就是我问题的重点:我不追求如何以更快的方式“填充”图像(我所做的只是进行单元测试的示例)。我只想知道什么是快速且内存高效的方法(即快速且不创建不必要的对象)。

我所做的概念验证实现显然非常节省内存,但速度很慢(为每个像素执行一次 getRGB 和一次 setRGB)。

示意性地,我得到了这个:(其中 A 表示复制之前目标图像中的相应像素)

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

并且我想要这样:

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAABBBBAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAABBBBAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

其中 'B' 表示 src 图像中的像素。

请注意,我正在寻找 copySrcIntoDstAt(...) 方法的精确替代,而不是 API 链接/引用。

import org.junit.Test;

import java.awt.image.BufferedImage;

import static org.junit.Assert.*;

public class TestCopy {

    private static final int COL1 = 0x8000BE50;  // alpha at 128
    private static final int COL2 = 0x1732FE87;  // alpha at  23 

    @Test
    public void testPixelsCopy() {
        final BufferedImage src = new BufferedImage(  5,  5, BufferedImage.TYPE_INT_ARGB );
        final BufferedImage dst = new BufferedImage( 20, 20, BufferedImage.TYPE_INT_ARGB );
        convenienceFill( src, COL1 );
        convenienceFill( dst, COL2 );
        copySrcIntoDstAt( src, dst, 3, 4 );
        for (int x = 0; x < dst.getWidth(); x++) {
            for (int y = 0; y < dst.getHeight(); y++) {
                if ( x >= 3 && x <= 7 && y >= 4 && y <= 8 ) {
                    assertEquals( COL1, dst.getRGB(x,y) );
                } else {
                    assertEquals( COL2, dst.getRGB(x,y) );
                }
            }
        }
    }

    // clipping is unnecessary
    private static void copySrcIntoDstAt(
            final BufferedImage src,
            final BufferedImage dst,
            final int dx,
            final int dy
    ) {
        // TODO: replace this by a much more efficient method
        for (int x = 0; x < src.getWidth(); x++) {
            for (int y = 0; y < src.getHeight(); y++) {
                dst.setRGB( dx + x, dy + y, src.getRGB(x,y) );
            }
        }
    }

    // This method is just a convenience method, there's
    // no point in optimizing this method, this is not what
    // this question is about
    private static void convenienceFill(
            final BufferedImage bi,
            final int color
    ) {
        for (int x = 0; x < bi.getWidth(); x++) {
            for (int y = 0; y < bi.getHeight(); y++) {
                bi.setRGB( x, y, color );
            }
        }
    }

}

I want to do a copy (of a rectangle area) of the ARGB values from a source BufferedImage into a destination BufferedImage. No compositing should be done: if I copy a pixel with an ARGB value of 0x8000BE50 (alpha value at 128), then the destination pixel must be exactly 0x8000BE50, totally overriding the destination pixel.

I've got a very precise question and I made a unit test to show what I need. The unit test is fully functional and self-contained and is passing fine and is doing precisely what I want.

However, I want a faster and more memory efficient method to replace copySrcIntoDstAt(...).

That's the whole point of my question: I'm not after how to "fill" the image in a faster way (what I did is just an example to have a unit test). All I want is to know what would be a fast and memory efficient way to do it (ie fast and not creating needless objects).

The proof-of-concept implementation I've made is obviously very memory efficient, but it is slow (doing one getRGB and one setRGB for every pixel).

Schematically, I've got this: (where A indicates corresponding pixels from the destination image before the copy)

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

And I want to have this:

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAABBBBAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAABBBBAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

where 'B' represents the pixels from the src image.

Note that I'm looking for an exact replacement of the copySrcIntoDstAt(...) method, not for an API link/quote.

import org.junit.Test;

import java.awt.image.BufferedImage;

import static org.junit.Assert.*;

public class TestCopy {

    private static final int COL1 = 0x8000BE50;  // alpha at 128
    private static final int COL2 = 0x1732FE87;  // alpha at  23 

    @Test
    public void testPixelsCopy() {
        final BufferedImage src = new BufferedImage(  5,  5, BufferedImage.TYPE_INT_ARGB );
        final BufferedImage dst = new BufferedImage( 20, 20, BufferedImage.TYPE_INT_ARGB );
        convenienceFill( src, COL1 );
        convenienceFill( dst, COL2 );
        copySrcIntoDstAt( src, dst, 3, 4 );
        for (int x = 0; x < dst.getWidth(); x++) {
            for (int y = 0; y < dst.getHeight(); y++) {
                if ( x >= 3 && x <= 7 && y >= 4 && y <= 8 ) {
                    assertEquals( COL1, dst.getRGB(x,y) );
                } else {
                    assertEquals( COL2, dst.getRGB(x,y) );
                }
            }
        }
    }

    // clipping is unnecessary
    private static void copySrcIntoDstAt(
            final BufferedImage src,
            final BufferedImage dst,
            final int dx,
            final int dy
    ) {
        // TODO: replace this by a much more efficient method
        for (int x = 0; x < src.getWidth(); x++) {
            for (int y = 0; y < src.getHeight(); y++) {
                dst.setRGB( dx + x, dy + y, src.getRGB(x,y) );
            }
        }
    }

    // This method is just a convenience method, there's
    // no point in optimizing this method, this is not what
    // this question is about
    private static void convenienceFill(
            final BufferedImage bi,
            final int color
    ) {
        for (int x = 0; x < bi.getWidth(); x++) {
            for (int y = 0; y < bi.getHeight(); y++) {
                bi.setRGB( x, y, color );
            }
        }
    }

}

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论(1

尝蛊 2024-09-08 17:57:25
private static void copySrcIntoDstAt(final BufferedImage src,
        final BufferedImage dst, final int dx, final int dy) {
    int[] srcbuf = ((DataBufferInt) src.getRaster().getDataBuffer()).getData();
    int[] dstbuf = ((DataBufferInt) dst.getRaster().getDataBuffer()).getData();
    int width = src.getWidth();
    int height = src.getHeight();
    int dstoffs = dx + dy * dst.getWidth();
    int srcoffs = 0;
    for (int y = 0 ; y < height ; y++ , dstoffs+= dst.getWidth(), srcoffs += width ) {
        System.arraycopy(srcbuf, srcoffs , dstbuf, dstoffs, width);
    }
}
private static void copySrcIntoDstAt(final BufferedImage src,
        final BufferedImage dst, final int dx, final int dy) {
    int[] srcbuf = ((DataBufferInt) src.getRaster().getDataBuffer()).getData();
    int[] dstbuf = ((DataBufferInt) dst.getRaster().getDataBuffer()).getData();
    int width = src.getWidth();
    int height = src.getHeight();
    int dstoffs = dx + dy * dst.getWidth();
    int srcoffs = 0;
    for (int y = 0 ; y < height ; y++ , dstoffs+= dst.getWidth(), srcoffs += width ) {
        System.arraycopy(srcbuf, srcoffs , dstbuf, dstoffs, width);
    }
}
~没有更多了~
我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
原文