汇编程序中的 Printf 不打印
我有一个作业,使用缓冲区溢出来破解程序(通过反汇编,程序是用 C++ 编写的,我没有源代码)。我已经成功了,但我有一个问题。我必须在屏幕上打印一些消息,所以我找到了 printf 函数的地址,将“HACKED”的地址和“%s”的地址推送到堆栈上(按此顺序)并调用该函数。调用的代码顺利通过,但没有打印任何内容。
我尝试像程序中其他地方一样模拟环境,但一定有问题。您知道我做错了什么导致我没有输出吗?非常感谢
编辑:
这个程序运行在 Windows XP SP3 32b 上,用 C++ 编写,Intel asm
有“hack”代码
CPU Disasm
Address Hex dump Command Comments
0012F9A3 90 NOP ;hack begins
0012F9A4 90 NOP
0012F9A5 90 NOP
0012F9A6 89E5 MOV EBP,ESP
0012F9A8 83EC 7F SUB ESP,7F ;creating a place for working data
0012F9AB 83EC 7F SUB ESP,7F
0012F9AE 31C0 XOR EAX,EAX
0012F9B0 50 PUSH EAX
0012F9B1 50 PUSH EAX
0012F9B2 50 PUSH EAX
0012F9B3 89E8 MOV EAX,EBP
0012F9B5 83E8 09 SUB EAX,9
0012F9B8 BA 1406EDFF MOV EDX,FFED0614 ;address to jump, it is negative because there mustn't be 00 bytes
0012F9BD F7DA NOT EDX
0012F9BF FFE2 JMP EDX ;I have to jump because there are some values overwritten by the program
0012F9C1 90 NOP
0012F9C2 0090 00000000 ADD BYTE PTR DS:[EAX],DL
0012F9C8 90 NOP
0012F9C9 90 NOP
0012F9CA 90 NOP
0012F9CB 90 NOP
0012F9CC 6C INS BYTE PTR ES:[EDI],DX ; I/O command
0012F9CD 65:6E OUTS DX,BYTE PTR GS:[ESI] ; I/O command
0012F9CF 67:74 68 JE SHORT 0012FA3A ; Superfluous address size prefix
0012F9D2 2069 73 AND BYTE PTR DS:[ECX+73],CH
0012F9D5 203439 AND BYTE PTR DS:[EDI+ECX],DH
0012F9D8 34 2C XOR AL,2C
0012F9DA 2066 69 AND BYTE PTR DS:[ESI+69],AH
0012F9DD 72 73 JB SHORT 0012FA52
0012F9DF 74 20 JE SHORT 0012FA01
0012F9E1 3120 XOR DWORD PTR DS:[EAX],ESP
0012F9E3 6C INS BYTE PTR ES:[EDI],DX ; I/O command
0012F9E4 696E 65 7300909 IMUL EBP,DWORD PTR DS:[ESI+65],-6F6FFF8D
0012F9EB 90 NOP
0012F9EC 90 NOP
0012F9ED 90 NOP
0012F9EE 31DB XOR EBX,EBX ; hack continues
0012F9F0 8818 MOV BYTE PTR DS:[EAX],BL ; writing 00 behind word "HACKED"
0012F9F2 83E8 06 SUB EAX,6
0012F9F5 50 PUSH EAX ; address of "HACKED"
0012F9F6 B8 3B8CBEFF MOV EAX,FFBE8C3B
0012F9FB F7D0 NOT EAX
0012F9FD 50 PUSH EAX ; address of "%s"
0012F9FE B8 3897BFFF MOV EAX,FFBF9738
0012FA03 F7D0 NOT EAX
0012FA05 FFD0 CALL EAX ;address of printf
程序开头
CPU Disasm
Address Hex dump Command Comments
00403F40 /$ 55 PUSH EBP
00403F41 |. 8BEC MOV EBP,ESP
00403F43 |. 6A FF PUSH -1
00403F45 |. 68 AB6D4100 PUSH pop3.00416DAB
00403F4A |. 64:A1 0000000 MOV EAX,DWORD PTR FS:[0]
00403F50 |. 50 PUSH EAX
00403F51 |. 64:8925 00000 MOV DWORD PTR FS:[0],ESP
00403F58 |. 81EC 4C050000 SUB ESP,54C
00403F5E |. 6A 00 PUSH 0 ; /Arg1 = 0
00403F60 |. E8 6BDEFFFF CALL 00401DD0 ; \pop3.00401DD0
00403F65 |. 83C4 04 ADD ESP,4
00403F68 |. 50 PUSH EAX ; /Arg1
00403F69 |. E8 DA2D0000 CALL 00406D48 ; \pop3.00406D48
00403F6E |. 83C4 04 ADD ESP,4
00403F71 |. 837D 08 02 CMP DWORD PTR SS:[ARG.1],2
00403F75 |. 74 21 JE SHORT 00403F98
00403F77 |. 837D 08 03 CMP DWORD PTR SS:[ARG.1],3
00403F7B |. 74 1B JE SHORT 00403F98
00403F7D |. 8B45 0C MOV EAX,DWORD PTR SS:[ARG.2]
00403F80 |. 8B08 MOV ECX,DWORD PTR DS:[EAX]
00403F82 |. 51 PUSH ECX
00403F83 |. 68 287D4100 PUSH OFFSET pop3.00417D28 ; ASCII "%s arg: port [log dir]"
00403F88 |. E8 3A290000 CALL 004068C7 ; this is probably address of printf, I have source code of previous version of this program, this part is probably same
:这个代码真的很难看,因为我是汇编程序新手,不能有由于缓冲区溢出错误而导致空字节
I have got a homework to hack program using buffer overflow ( with disassambling, program was written in C++, I haven't got the source code ). I have already managed it but I have a problem. I have to print some message on the screen, so I found out address of printf function, pushed address of "HACKED" and address of "%s" on the stack ( in this order ) and called that function. Called code passed well but nothing had been printed.
I have tried to simulate the environment like in other place in the program but there has to be something wrong. Do you have any idea what I am doing wrong that I have no output, please? Thanks a lot
EDIT:
This program is running on Windows XP SP3 32b, written in C++, Intel asm
there is the "hack" code
CPU Disasm
Address Hex dump Command Comments
0012F9A3 90 NOP ;hack begins
0012F9A4 90 NOP
0012F9A5 90 NOP
0012F9A6 89E5 MOV EBP,ESP
0012F9A8 83EC 7F SUB ESP,7F ;creating a place for working data
0012F9AB 83EC 7F SUB ESP,7F
0012F9AE 31C0 XOR EAX,EAX
0012F9B0 50 PUSH EAX
0012F9B1 50 PUSH EAX
0012F9B2 50 PUSH EAX
0012F9B3 89E8 MOV EAX,EBP
0012F9B5 83E8 09 SUB EAX,9
0012F9B8 BA 1406EDFF MOV EDX,FFED0614 ;address to jump, it is negative because there mustn't be 00 bytes
0012F9BD F7DA NOT EDX
0012F9BF FFE2 JMP EDX ;I have to jump because there are some values overwritten by the program
0012F9C1 90 NOP
0012F9C2 0090 00000000 ADD BYTE PTR DS:[EAX],DL
0012F9C8 90 NOP
0012F9C9 90 NOP
0012F9CA 90 NOP
0012F9CB 90 NOP
0012F9CC 6C INS BYTE PTR ES:[EDI],DX ; I/O command
0012F9CD 65:6E OUTS DX,BYTE PTR GS:[ESI] ; I/O command
0012F9CF 67:74 68 JE SHORT 0012FA3A ; Superfluous address size prefix
0012F9D2 2069 73 AND BYTE PTR DS:[ECX+73],CH
0012F9D5 203439 AND BYTE PTR DS:[EDI+ECX],DH
0012F9D8 34 2C XOR AL,2C
0012F9DA 2066 69 AND BYTE PTR DS:[ESI+69],AH
0012F9DD 72 73 JB SHORT 0012FA52
0012F9DF 74 20 JE SHORT 0012FA01
0012F9E1 3120 XOR DWORD PTR DS:[EAX],ESP
0012F9E3 6C INS BYTE PTR ES:[EDI],DX ; I/O command
0012F9E4 696E 65 7300909 IMUL EBP,DWORD PTR DS:[ESI+65],-6F6FFF8D
0012F9EB 90 NOP
0012F9EC 90 NOP
0012F9ED 90 NOP
0012F9EE 31DB XOR EBX,EBX ; hack continues
0012F9F0 8818 MOV BYTE PTR DS:[EAX],BL ; writing 00 behind word "HACKED"
0012F9F2 83E8 06 SUB EAX,6
0012F9F5 50 PUSH EAX ; address of "HACKED"
0012F9F6 B8 3B8CBEFF MOV EAX,FFBE8C3B
0012F9FB F7D0 NOT EAX
0012F9FD 50 PUSH EAX ; address of "%s"
0012F9FE B8 3897BFFF MOV EAX,FFBF9738
0012FA03 F7D0 NOT EAX
0012FA05 FFD0 CALL EAX ;address of printf
beginning of the program:
CPU Disasm
Address Hex dump Command Comments
00403F40 /$ 55 PUSH EBP
00403F41 |. 8BEC MOV EBP,ESP
00403F43 |. 6A FF PUSH -1
00403F45 |. 68 AB6D4100 PUSH pop3.00416DAB
00403F4A |. 64:A1 0000000 MOV EAX,DWORD PTR FS:[0]
00403F50 |. 50 PUSH EAX
00403F51 |. 64:8925 00000 MOV DWORD PTR FS:[0],ESP
00403F58 |. 81EC 4C050000 SUB ESP,54C
00403F5E |. 6A 00 PUSH 0 ; /Arg1 = 0
00403F60 |. E8 6BDEFFFF CALL 00401DD0 ; \pop3.00401DD0
00403F65 |. 83C4 04 ADD ESP,4
00403F68 |. 50 PUSH EAX ; /Arg1
00403F69 |. E8 DA2D0000 CALL 00406D48 ; \pop3.00406D48
00403F6E |. 83C4 04 ADD ESP,4
00403F71 |. 837D 08 02 CMP DWORD PTR SS:[ARG.1],2
00403F75 |. 74 21 JE SHORT 00403F98
00403F77 |. 837D 08 03 CMP DWORD PTR SS:[ARG.1],3
00403F7B |. 74 1B JE SHORT 00403F98
00403F7D |. 8B45 0C MOV EAX,DWORD PTR SS:[ARG.2]
00403F80 |. 8B08 MOV ECX,DWORD PTR DS:[EAX]
00403F82 |. 51 PUSH ECX
00403F83 |. 68 287D4100 PUSH OFFSET pop3.00417D28 ; ASCII "%s arg: port [log dir]"
00403F88 |. E8 3A290000 CALL 004068C7 ; this is probably address of printf, I have source code of previous version of this program, this part is probably same
This code is really ugly because I am new in assembler and there mustn't be null bytes because of buffer-overflow bug
如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱,如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论,将不能在第一时间通知您!
发布评论
评论(2)
printf 的参数是否以正确的顺序传递,它们的数量是否正确,并且它们都通过堆栈传递(优化可能意味着改为使用寄存器)。参数数量可变可能会导致参数列表比您的假设更复杂。也许尝试调用puts,这可能会更简单。
编辑:刚刚看到您的编辑,并且您正在尝试分解一堆不应该执行的文本;以 as 开头的代码
实际上只是一段文字,表示“长度为 494,前 1 行”。我发现这是因为 printf 不应该有 INS 和 OUTS。提示:当破解和反汇编代码时,请务必在显示 ASCII 和 UNICODE 的编辑器中并排查看代码,以根除文本文字。
Are you that parameters to printf are passed in the right order, you have the right number of them, and they are all passed through the stack (optimization may mean registers are used instead). The variable number of parameters could result in a more complex parameter list than your assuming. Maybe try a call to puts which could be simpler.
Edit: Just saw your edit, and you're trying to disassemble a bunch of text that should never get executed; The code starting as
is actually just a piece of text saying 'ength is 494,first 1 lines'. I spotted this as printf should not have INS and OUTS. Hint: When hacking and disassembling code always look at it side by side in an editor that shows ASCII and UNICODE to root out text literals.
我还没有发现错误,但我改变了我的黑客代码的结构,现在它可以工作了。我只发布了一些指令,这些指令将 EIP 从堆栈重定向到我拥有“无限”空间的堆,在这里我可以执行所需的代码。谢谢您的建议。
I haven't found the mistake but I have changed structure of my hack code and now it is working. I am posting only few instructions which redirect EIP out of the stack to the heap where I have "unlimited" space and here I can execute desired code. Thank you for your advice.