jQuery 范例？
在我看来，jQuery 似乎并不是作为一个 OOP 框架编写的，它似乎太短了，而且不够详细。我的想法是否正确？如果它不是以 OOP 形式编写的，那么他们使用的是什么方法/范式？
It seems to me that jQuery doesn't seem to be written as an OOP framework, it seems too short, and not verbose enough for that. Am I right in thinking this and if it isn't written as OOP, then what methodology/paradigm are they using?
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（4）
我怀疑该方法是：使其尽可能小且尽可能快。
I would suspect the methodology to be: make it as small and as fast as possible.
他们使用函数式编程范例。
它很小，很简单，而且速度很快。
They use the functional programming paradigm.
It's tiny, it's straightforward, and it's fast.
jQuery 的行为类似于 monad。 Monad 通常用于函数式编程语言（例如 Haskell），但不限于此。请参阅http://importantshock.wordpress.com/2009/ 01/18/jquery-is-a-monad/
我不愿意说 jQuery 使用函数式编程范式，因为它是非常有状态的，而函数式程序试图避免这种情况。
jQuery behaves like a monad. Monads are usually used in functional programming langauges such as Haskell, but are not limited to them. See http://importantshock.wordpress.com/2009/01/18/jquery-is-a-monad/
I'm reluctant to say jQuery uses the functional programming paradigm because it is very stateful, which functional programs try to avoid.
不，jquery 并不是为了成为一个 oo 框架而编写的。这一切都是为了抽象 dom 和 ajax。这是一篇关于 jquery 和 mootools 之间差异的精彩文章： http://jqueryvsmootools.com/
No, jquery isn't written to be a oo framework. It is all about abstracting the dom and ajax. Here is a great article about the differences between jquery and mootools: http://jqueryvsmootools.com/