Clojure:从序列中查找连续项

发布于 2024-08-30 02:33:49 字数 291 浏览 4 评论 0原文

在 Clojure 程序中,我有一个数字序列:

(2 3 4 6 8 1)

我想找到其中项目连续的最长子序列:

(2 3 4)

我假设它将涉及 (take-while ...)(减少...)

有什么想法吗?

澄清:我需要最长的初始连续项目列表。我确信,容易多了。感谢您对我最初提出的更困难的问题的解决方案。

In a Clojure program, I have a sequence of numbers:

(2 3 4 6 8 1)

I want to find the longest sub-sequence where the items are sequential:

(2 3 4)

I am assuming that it will involve (take-while ...) or (reduce ...).

Any ideas?

Clarification: I need the longest initial list of sequential items. Much easier, I'm sure. Thanks for the solutions to the more difficult problem I initially posed.

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论(4

无需解释 2024-09-06 02:33:49

如果您只对最长的初始序列感兴趣,那么它是 1-liner:

(defn longest-initial-sequence [[x :as s]]
  (take-while identity (map #(#{%1} %2) s (iterate inc x))))

If you are only interested in the longest initial sequence, it's a 1-liner:

(defn longest-initial-sequence [[x :as s]]
  (take-while identity (map #(#{%1} %2) s (iterate inc x))))
著墨染雨君画夕 2024-09-06 02:33:49

考虑到OP对这个问题的评论——这完全改变了游戏! -- 这可以写得非常简单:

(let [doubletons (partition 2 1 [1 2 3 5 6])
      increment? (fn increment? [[x y]]
                   (== (inc x) y))]
  (cons (ffirst doubletons)
        (map second (take-while increment? doubletons))))

;; returns (1 2 3)

注意,这实际上是懒惰的。由于本地清算,我预计它不会占据双子的头部。另一个版本:

(cons (first [1 2 3 5 6])
      (map second (take-while increment? (partition 2 1 [1 2 3 5 6]))))

不过,问题的原始版本更有趣! :-) 可以使用上面的方法构建一个超级简单的解决方案,但是当然,这会比使用reduce性能低得多。我将看看我是否有任何与 zmila 和 dnolen 的解决方案有本质不同的东西——但仍然具有相当的性能——稍后添加到该线程的该部分。 (我猜不太可能。)

Taking into account the OP's comment on the question -- which completely changes the game! -- this can be written very simply:

(let [doubletons (partition 2 1 [1 2 3 5 6])
      increment? (fn increment? [[x y]]
                   (== (inc x) y))]
  (cons (ffirst doubletons)
        (map second (take-while increment? doubletons))))

;; returns (1 2 3)

Note that this is actually lazy. I expect it not to hold onto the head of doubletons thanks to locals clearing. Another version:

(cons (first [1 2 3 5 6])
      (map second (take-while increment? (partition 2 1 [1 2 3 5 6]))))

The original version of the question is more fun, though! :-) A super-simple solution to that could be built using the above, but of course that would be significantly less performant than using reduce. I'll see if I have anything substantially different from zmila's and dnolen's solutions -- and yet still reasonably performant -- to add to that part of this thread later. (Not very likely, I guess.)

对原文的回答:

(defn conj-if-sequential
  ([] [])
  ([a] a)
  ([a b] (let [a (if (vector? a) a [a])]
           (if (= (inc (last a)) b)
             (conj a b)
             a))))

(reduce conj-if-sequential [2 3 4 6 8 1])

对于那些感兴趣的人来说,一个更通用的解决方案:

(defn sequential-seqs
  ([] [])
  ([a] a)
  ([a b] (let [n (last (last a))]
           (if (and n (= (inc n) b))
             (update-in a [(dec (count a))] conj b)
             (conj a [b])))))

(defn largest
  ([] nil)
  ([a] a)
  ([a b] (if (> (count b) (count a)) b a)))

(reduce largest (reduce sequential-seqs [] [2 3 4 6 8 1 4 5 6 7 8 9 13]))

我认为这要好得多。

Answer to original:

(defn conj-if-sequential
  ([] [])
  ([a] a)
  ([a b] (let [a (if (vector? a) a [a])]
           (if (= (inc (last a)) b)
             (conj a b)
             a))))

(reduce conj-if-sequential [2 3 4 6 8 1])

A more generic solution for those interested:

(defn sequential-seqs
  ([] [])
  ([a] a)
  ([a b] (let [n (last (last a))]
           (if (and n (= (inc n) b))
             (update-in a [(dec (count a))] conj b)
             (conj a [b])))))

(defn largest
  ([] nil)
  ([a] a)
  ([a b] (if (> (count b) (count a)) b a)))

(reduce largest (reduce sequential-seqs [] [2 3 4 6 8 1 4 5 6 7 8 9 13]))

I think this is much better.

耳根太软 2024-09-06 02:33:49
(defn find-max-seq [lst]
  (let [[f & r] lst, 
        longest-seq (fn [a b] (if (> (count a) (count b)) a b)),
        [last-seq max-seq] (reduce 
                             (fn [ [[prev-num & _ :as cur-seq] max-seq] cur-num ]
                               (if (== (inc prev-num) cur-num) 
                                 [(conj cur-seq cur-num) max-seq]
                                 [(list cur-num) (longest-seq cur-seq max-seq)]
                                 ))
                             [(list f) ()]
                             r)]
    (reverse (longest-seq last-seq max-seq))))

(find-max-seq '(2 3 4 6 8 1))  ; ==> (2 3 4) 
(find-max-seq '(3 2 3 4 6 8 9 10 11)) ; ==> (8 9 10 11)
(defn find-max-seq [lst]
  (let [[f & r] lst, 
        longest-seq (fn [a b] (if (> (count a) (count b)) a b)),
        [last-seq max-seq] (reduce 
                             (fn [ [[prev-num & _ :as cur-seq] max-seq] cur-num ]
                               (if (== (inc prev-num) cur-num) 
                                 [(conj cur-seq cur-num) max-seq]
                                 [(list cur-num) (longest-seq cur-seq max-seq)]
                                 ))
                             [(list f) ()]
                             r)]
    (reverse (longest-seq last-seq max-seq))))

(find-max-seq '(2 3 4 6 8 1))  ; ==> (2 3 4) 
(find-max-seq '(3 2 3 4 6 8 9 10 11)) ; ==> (8 9 10 11)
~没有更多了~
我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
原文