PHP OOP:在域模型模式中避免单例/静态方法

发布于 2024-08-29 19:23:25 字数 1617 浏览 1 评论 0原文

我理解依赖注入的重要性及其在单元测试中的作用,这就是为什么以下问题让我暂停:

我努力不使用单例的一个领域是身份映射/工作单元模式(它密切关注域)对象状态)。

//Not actual code, but it should demonstrate the point    

class Monitor{//singleton construction omitted for brevity
    static $members = array();//keeps record of all objects
    static $dirty = array();//keeps record of all modified objects
    static $clean = array();//keeps record of all clean objects
}

class Mapper{//queries database, maps values to object fields
    public function find($id){
        if(isset(Monitor::members[$id]){
        return Monitor::members[$id];
    }
    $values = $this->selectStmt($id);
    //field mapping process omitted for brevity
    $Object = new Object($values);
    Monitor::new[$id]=$Object
    return $Object;
}

$User = $UserMapper->find(1);//domain object is registered in Id Map
$User->changePropertyX();//object is marked "dirty" in UoW

// at this point, I can save by passing the Domain Object back to the Mapper
$UserMapper->save($User);//object is marked clean in UoW

//but a nicer API would be something like this
$User->save();

//but if I want to do this - it has to make a call to the mapper/db somehow    
$User->getBlogPosts();

//or else have to generate specific collection/object graphing methods in the mapper
$UserPosts = $UserMapper->getBlogPosts();
$User->setPosts($UserPosts);

关于如何处理这种情况有什么建议吗?

我不愿意将映射器/数据库访问的实例传递/生成到域对象本身来满足 DI - 同时,避免这会导致域对象内对外部静态方法的大量调用。

尽管我想如果我希望“保存”成为其行为的一部分,那么在其构造中就需要一个这样做的设施。也许这是责任的问题,域对象不应该承担保存的负担。这只是 Active Record 模式中的一个非常巧妙的功能 - 如果能以某种方式实现它就好了。

I understand the importance of Dependency Injection and its role in Unit testing, which is why the following issue is giving me pause:

One area where I struggle not to use the Singleton is the Identity Map/Unit of Work pattern (Which keeps tabs on Domain Object state).

//Not actual code, but it should demonstrate the point    

class Monitor{//singleton construction omitted for brevity
    static $members = array();//keeps record of all objects
    static $dirty = array();//keeps record of all modified objects
    static $clean = array();//keeps record of all clean objects
}

class Mapper{//queries database, maps values to object fields
    public function find($id){
        if(isset(Monitor::members[$id]){
        return Monitor::members[$id];
    }
    $values = $this->selectStmt($id);
    //field mapping process omitted for brevity
    $Object = new Object($values);
    Monitor::new[$id]=$Object
    return $Object;
}

$User = $UserMapper->find(1);//domain object is registered in Id Map
$User->changePropertyX();//object is marked "dirty" in UoW

// at this point, I can save by passing the Domain Object back to the Mapper
$UserMapper->save($User);//object is marked clean in UoW

//but a nicer API would be something like this
$User->save();

//but if I want to do this - it has to make a call to the mapper/db somehow    
$User->getBlogPosts();

//or else have to generate specific collection/object graphing methods in the mapper
$UserPosts = $UserMapper->getBlogPosts();
$User->setPosts($UserPosts);

Any advice on how you might handle this situation?

I would be loathe to pass/generate instances of the mapper/database access into the Domain Object itself to satisfy DI - At the same time, avoiding that results in lots of calls within the Domain Object to external static methods.

Although I guess if I want "save" to be part of its behaviour then a facility to do so is required in its construction. Perhaps it's a problem with responsibility, the Domain Object shouldn't be burdened with saving. It's just quite a neat feature from the Active Record pattern - it would be nice to implement it in some way.

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论(1

莫多说 2024-09-05 19:23:25

我所做的(尽管可能不是最好的做法)是为我的类制定明确的命名约定,FI:user_User 是域对象,user_mapper_User 是它的映射器。

在我的父 domainObject 类中,我编写了逻辑来查找它的映射器。

然后,您有几个选项可以委托给它,一个明显的选项是使用 domainObject 中的 __call() 方法。

What I do, albeit maybe not the best course of action, is to have a clear naming convention for my classes, FI: user_User is the domain object and user_mapper_User is it's mapper.

In my parent domainObject class I code the logic to find it's mapper.

Then you have a couple options to delegate to it, an obvious one would be to use the __call() method in domainObject.

~没有更多了~
我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
原文