因此，要回答标题问题，您需要向 MS 产品管理部门解释 IntelliTrace 不是您选择 VS 2010 Ultimate Edition 的原因，但它可能是一个选择您从 2005/2008 升级到 VS 2010 专业版的原因。从 Vista 开始，MS 产品管理当然理解版本跳跃，因此这可以是一个令人信服的论点。
This is of course fundamentally a question to Product Management at Microsoft. They will have profiles of the intended market segments they're targetting. Willingness ot part with cash is one of those things, yes. But on the linked page, there's a small 2 line blurb that's also telling. The cheaper editions are expected to be used by individuals on small projects, the more expensive by teams on larger projects. Therefore many of the distinguishing features support those larger projects.
So, to answer the title question, you need to explain to MS Product Management that IntelliTrace is not a reason for you to choose VS 2010 Ultimate Edition, but it would be a reason for you to upgrade from 2005/2008 to VS 2010 Professional Edition. Since Vista, MS Product Management certainly understands version skipping, so this can be a convincing argument.
While I would love to have both static analysis of code contracts, intellitrace, and the new sequence diagram stuff built into Premium and Ultimate, I understand that there are multiple SKUs for different prices.
I don't think there is much we can do to change this at this point, so expect to either live with the missing features, or live with the missing money.
IntelliTrace 是 VS2010 的杀手级功能（至少对于某些人来说），因此 Microsoft 营销只是试图通过让人们进行转换来专门针对此功能获得高投资回报率。
IntelliTrace is the killer feature of VS2010 (for some, at least), so Microsoft marketing is simply trying to get a high ROI specifically on this feature by getting people to convert.
如果 Intellitrace 单独打包（有价格），那么价格会便宜得多。对于微软来说，很难声称它无法做到这一点，因为它已经取消了 Internet Explorer 的捆绑销售——这是一个相当困难的挑战。将 Intellitrace 分拆并单独出售基本上会给微软带来意外之财。他们销售的 VS Ultimate 副本会减少，但足以弥补 Intellitrace 的销售量。
Although Intellitrace qualifies as a premium feature, there are lots of other features both in Visual Studio and other Microsoft products that at one time were treated as "premium". Eventually, adoption-through-the-grassroots prevailed and those features became part of lower-priced product editions.
Here are two distinctly different approaches to making the case:
Microsoft stands to make more money via grassroots-adoption - its traditional strength - than by premium editions that are way outside the budgets of most developers and organizations.
If Intellitrace were to be packaged separately (for a price), it would be considerably more affordable. It would be very difficult for Microsoft to claim that it couldn't do this because it has already unbundled Internet Explorer - a considerably more difficult challenge. Unbundling Intellitrace and selling it separately would basically result in a windfall for Microsoft. They'd sell fewer copies of VS Ultimate, but they'd more than make up for that in Intellitrace sales.
发布评论
评论（7）
当然，这从根本上来说是微软产品管理的一个问题。他们将拥有他们所瞄准的预期细分市场的概况。是的，愿意放弃现金就是其中之一。但在链接页面上，有一个两行的小简介也很能说明问题。较便宜的版本预计供个人在小型项目中使用，而较昂贵的版本则供团队在大型项目中使用。因此，许多显着的功能都支持那些较大的项目。
因此，要回答标题问题，您需要向 MS 产品管理部门解释 IntelliTrace 不是您选择 VS 2010 Ultimate Edition 的原因，但它可能是一个选择您从 2005/2008 升级到 VS 2010 专业版的原因。从 Vista 开始，MS 产品管理当然理解版本跳跃，因此这可以是一个令人信服的论点。
This is of course fundamentally a question to Product Management at Microsoft. They will have profiles of the intended market segments they're targetting. Willingness ot part with cash is one of those things, yes. But on the linked page, there's a small 2 line blurb that's also telling. The cheaper editions are expected to be used by individuals on small projects, the more expensive by teams on larger projects. Therefore many of the distinguishing features support those larger projects.
So, to answer the title question, you need to explain to MS Product Management that IntelliTrace is not a reason for you to choose VS 2010 Ultimate Edition, but it would be a reason for you to upgrade from 2005/2008 to VS 2010 Professional Edition. Since Vista, MS Product Management certainly understands version skipping, so this can be a convincing argument.
虽然我希望对代码合约、intellitrace 进行静态分析，并在 Premium 和 Ultimate 中内置新的序列图，但我知道有多个不同价格的 SKU。
我认为目前我们无法做太多改变这一点，所以要么接受缺少的功能，要么接受缺少的钱。
While I would love to have both static analysis of code contracts, intellitrace, and the new sequence diagram stuff built into Premium and Ultimate, I understand that there are multiple SKUs for different prices.
I don't think there is much we can do to change this at this point, so expect to either live with the missing features, or live with the missing money.
如果你想使用优质的东西，你需要花一些现金。
If you want to use superior stuff, you are expected to shell out some cash.
更多功能=更多钱。这是普遍原则。
此外，您始终可以寻找具有类似功能且成本低于终极版的附加组件。
More Features= More Money. And this is universal principal.
Besides you can always look for add-ons which have similar functionality and which cost less than the Ultimate Edition.
IntelliTrace 是 VS2010 的杀手级功能（至少对于某些人来说），因此 Microsoft 营销只是试图通过让人们进行转换来专门针对此功能获得高投资回报率。
IntelliTrace is the killer feature of VS2010 (for some, at least), so Microsoft marketing is simply trying to get a high ROI specifically on this feature by getting people to convert.
尽管 Intellitrace 符合高级功能的资格，但 Visual Studio 和其他 Microsoft 产品中还有许多其他功能一度被视为“高级”。最终，草根阶层的采用盛行，这些功能成为低价产品版本的一部分。
这里有两种截然不同的方法来说明这一点：
微软通过草根采用（其传统优势）比通过高级版本赚更多的钱，而高级版本远远超出了大多数开发者和组织的预算。
如果 Intellitrace 单独打包（有价格），那么价格会便宜得多。对于微软来说，很难声称它无法做到这一点，因为它已经取消了 Internet Explorer 的捆绑销售——这是一个相当困难的挑战。将 Intellitrace 分拆并单独出售基本上会给微软带来意外之财。他们销售的 VS Ultimate 副本会减少，但足以弥补 Intellitrace 的销售量。
Although Intellitrace qualifies as a premium feature, there are lots of other features both in Visual Studio and other Microsoft products that at one time were treated as "premium". Eventually, adoption-through-the-grassroots prevailed and those features became part of lower-priced product editions.
Here are two distinctly different approaches to making the case:
Microsoft stands to make more money via grassroots-adoption - its traditional strength - than by premium editions that are way outside the budgets of most developers and organizations.
If Intellitrace were to be packaged separately (for a price), it would be considerably more affordable. It would be very difficult for Microsoft to claim that it couldn't do this because it has already unbundled Internet Explorer - a considerably more difficult challenge. Unbundling Intellitrace and selling it separately would basically result in a windfall for Microsoft. They'd sell fewer copies of VS Ultimate, but they'd more than make up for that in Intellitrace sales.
与任何具有“高级”套餐的产品一样，对于那些愿意支付价格的人来说，需要保留一些功能。
尽管我很想发起一场革命，但我看不到这场革命的进展。也许在未来的版本中这个功能会被过滤掉。
As with any product with 'premium' packages, some features will need to be kept for those willing to pay the price.
Much as I'd love to start a revolution I can't see this one moving. Maybe in future versions this feature will filter down.