Visual Studio 8、PVCS 或 Rational ClearCase
我们目前正在使用带有 Visual Source Safe 的 Visual Studio 8。由于客户要求，我们必须迁移到 PVCS 或 Rational ClearCase，Team System 不是一个选项。请推荐这两个选项之一，并根据每个选项的经验给出优缺点。每个与 Visual Studio 8 的集成程度如何？
We are currently using Visual Studio 8 with Visual Source Safe. Due to customer requirement, we must migrate to either PVCS or Rational ClearCase, Team System is not an option. Please recommend one of these two options, giving pros/cons from experience with each. How well does each integrate with Visual Studio 8?
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（2）
没有足够的信息来推荐其中之一。我管理这两个系统已经超过 10 年了。目前我是 ClearCase 管理员。
要回答的问题：有多少开发人员？它们分布在多个站点吗？是 100% Windows 还是 Unix 也是一种环境可能性？有多少数据要存储？
ClearCase 具有工业实力，但它在各个方面也都极其昂贵——从许可到必要的设备和人力资源。它具有良好的扩展性，但需要强大的服务器环境。它的管理极其复杂，尤其是在混合操作系统环境中。对于新用户来说，学习曲线巨大，对于新管理员来说，学习曲线更加巨大。如果您想要合理的性能，它可能会非常慢，并且服务器对硬件有很高的要求。 ClearCase 以多种方式支持多站点环境。它非常有能力偿还所有这些费用和复杂性。准备好雇用至少一名全职管理员。我是认真的。
PVCS 是一个坚固、可靠的系统，并不总是需要服务器。它的扩展性也很好（我曾经管理过一个有 140 名开发人员的 PVCS 项目）。它易于管理且易于学习。它的功能丰富程度远不及 ClearCase。很多人会说这是一件好事。它更简单，也更不容易出现麻烦。
如果您想比较其他工具，PVCS 比 ClearCase 更像使用 CVS。 ClearCase 与任何其他源代码控制工具不同。
There is not enough information to recommend one or the other. I've administrated both systems for more than 10 years. Currently I'm a ClearCase administrator.
Questions to answer: how many developers are there? Are they spread across multiple sites? Is it 100% Windows or is Unix also an environmental possibility? How much data is there to store?
ClearCase is industrial strength, but it is also ridiculously expensive in every way possible - from licensing to equipment and human resources necessary. It scales well but requires a strong server environment. It is extremely complicated to administer, especially in mixed O/S environment. HUGE learning curve for new users, HUGER for new admins. It can be perversely slow and the server has beefy hardware requirements if you want reasonable performance. ClearCase supports multisite environments in multiple ways. It's very capable as payback for all this expense and complexity. Be ready to hire at least one full-time administrator. I'm serious.
PVCS is a solid, reliable system that does not always require a server. It also scales well (I once administrated a PVCS project with 140 developers). It is easy to administer and easy to learn. It does not have anywhere near the feature richness of ClearCase. Many would say that's a good thing. It's much simpler and less prone to trouble.
PVCS is much more like using CVS than ClearCase is, if you want to compare other tools. ClearCase isn't like any other source control tool.
我对 PVCS 没有直接的经验。
关于 ClearCase，VS2008 的插件< /a> 效果很好（除了 构建服务器），并且具有ClearCase 的优点和不便< /a>.
这意味着，您需要了解 ClearCase 背后的概念以及如何利用其功能。
I have no direct experience with PVCS.
Regarding ClearCase, the plugin for VS2008 works well enough (except in the build server), and comes with the advantages and inconveniences of ClearCase.
That means, you need to know the concepts behind ClearCase and how to leverage its features.