在 HttpContext.Current.Items 与 ViewData 中存储数据

发布于 2024-08-28 14:03:23 字数 614 浏览 6 评论 0原文

什么时候适合在 HttpContext.Current.Items[...] 中存储数据,什么时候适合在 ViewData[...] 中存储数据?

我正在尝试找出在此集合中存储数据的最佳实践,但不确定在 HttpContext.Current.Items 中存储用户特定的数据是否安全。

一种用例是从基本控制器的 OnActionExecuting(...) 传递用户积分,以用于 Controller 计算并在 Views 中显示>;我知道我应该使用 ViewData 来实现此目的,但我得到了一些与嵌套部分视图不一致的结果。

HttpContext.Current.Items[...]Controllers 类似 Controllers 是否正确? strong>ViewData[...]Views 吗?

When is it appropriate to store data in HttpContext.Current.Items[...] vs storing data in ViewData[...]?

I'm trying to figure out the best practices for storing data in this collection and I'm not sure if it's safe to store user-specific data in HttpContext.Current.Items.

One use-case is passing down user credits from a base controller's OnActionExecuting(...) to be used in Controller calculations and for display in Views; I know I should be using ViewData for this, but I've had some inconsistent results with nested partial views.

Would it be correct to say that HttpContext.Current.Items[...] is to Controllers like ViewData[...] is to Views?

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论(1

九公里浅绿 2024-09-04 14:03:23

HttpContext.Current.Items 仅在请求期间持续,但对于该请求中的所有内容都是全局的。

会话显然持续整个用户会话,并且在请求之间持续存在。

您应该能够仅根据这些标准来确定需要使用哪一个。我不推荐使用 HttpContext.Current.Items ,因为它往往是一种“全局变量”,而且魔术键字符串往往会涉及到,但有时您确实需要使用它。

此外,尽管 .Items 和 ViewData 之间的比较非常恰当,但 .Items 与 ViewData 的行为方式不同,因为请求中涉及的每个视图(部分或其他)都会获取自己的 ViewData 副本。

当您执行 RenderPartial 并尝试向 ViewData 添加某些内容时,行为差异很明显 - 当您返回到父视图时,该项目不在那里。

HttpContext.Current.Items only lasts for the duration of the request, but it is global to everything in that request.

Session obviously lasts for the entirety of the user's session, and persists between requests.

You should be able to figure out which one you need to use based on those criteria alone. Using HttpContext.Current.Items is not something I would recommend as it tends to be a kind of "global variable", and magic key strings tend to get involved, but sometimes you really do need to use it.

Additionally, although your comparison between .Items and ViewData is pretty apt, .Items differs from the way that ViewData behaves, because every View involved in the request (partial or otherwise) gets their own copy of ViewData.

The behaviour difference is clear when you do a RenderPartial and try to add something to ViewData - when you go back up to the parent view, the item is not there.

~没有更多了~
我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
原文