人机交互项目的评估技术是什么（不涉及用户或心理学家）？
我将为我的论文选择一个主题，它将是一个人机交互项目。 （人机交互）。
这将是一个研究项目，我需要对其进行某种评估。我宁愿不使用人类用户或必须与心理学家合作。
我可以使用任何指标或评估模型吗？
I'm going to choose a topic for my thesis and it will be a HCI project. (human computer interaction).
It will be a research project, and I need to think some kind of evaluation for it. I would prefer to not use human users or having to collaborate with psychologist for it.
Is there any metric, or evaluation models I could use instead?
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（4）
您似乎错过了缩写词第一个单词的要点 -
Human。您必须设定某种标准来评估任务的成功程度，并让人们尝试该任务。
然后可以对完成任务的不同方法进行比较和对比（即有多少人成功完成了任务。有提示，没有提示等......）。
如果您担心成本，这里是一篇关于廉价进行可用性实验室的文章。
You seem to have missed the point of the first word of the acronym -
Human.You will have to set some sort of criteria for evaluating success in a task and let people try the task.
Different ways to achieve the task can then be compared and contrasted to each (i.e. how many people succeeded in completing the task. With prompting, without etc...).
If you are worried about cost, here is an article about doing usability labs cheaply.
呃，没有用户就失去了人机界面研究项目的意义。
Uhh, not having users would kind of defeat the point of a human-computer interface research project.
这称为“启发式评估”。真实用户的替代方案是让设计专家对您的应用程序进行“认知演练”，并根据一组设计启发法对其进行评估。
这虽然不如真正的用户研究那么好，但很容易。但我同意其他答案，认为这是一种可怕的上学方式。
It's called "heuristic evaluation." The alternative to real users is to have design experts do a "cognitive walkthrough" of your application, and evaluate it against a set of design heuristics.
This is not as good as a real user study, but it is very easy. But I agree with the other answers that this is a horrible way to go to school.
HCI 项目还可能涉及对多项其他 HCI（用户）研究中收集的数据进行荟萃分析。您也许能够找到一种有价值的新方法来考虑现有研究中的数据，或者考虑现有 HCI 研究之间的关系。
A HCI project could also involve a meta-analysis of data gathered in multiple other HCI (user) studies. You might be able to identify a valuable new way of considering the data from existing studies, or a way of considering the relationships between existing HCI studies.