如果 WCF 是未来，为什么还要搜索“Web 服务”？仍然指向ASMX？
我需要创建一个网络服务，所以我做的第一件事当然是访问 google
如果你看在这些结果中，您只会看到有关 ASMX 的内容，该技术显然被称为将被 WCF 取代的遗留技术。与 WCF 相比，为什么 ASMX 仍然如此受欢迎？ （当然，在 SO 上 WCF 更受欢迎......嗯）
I am needing to create a web service, so the first thing I did of course was go to google
If you look in those results, you'll see nothing but things about ASMX, which apparently is dubbed legacy technology to be replaced by WCF. Why is it that ASMX is still so vastly popular compared to WCF? (of course, on SO WCF is way more popular.. hmmm)
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（3）
因为它更老、更成熟。因此，互联网上有更多页面引用它。
它还使用不同的术语（因为 WCF 不仅仅是 Web 服务），因此您在搜索“Web 服务”时不会经常看到它出现在 Google 中。
Because it's older and more established. Therefore there are more pages on the Interwebs referring to it.
It also uses different terminology (because WCF is more than just web services) so you're not going to see it show up in Google as often for a search on "Web Services".
过去，如果您在 MSDN 上搜索“Web 服务安全”，您会找到有关 WSE 的文章。这并不意味着华尔街英语没有过时，也不意味着没有人应该使用它，除非他们别无选择。
这只是意味着那些不检查文章日期、不从搜索结果中进行良好研究的可怜虫最终会使用华尔街英语创建新项目。我每个月都会看到几次。
搜索引擎能够为您返回五年前的出色结果，就像它们为您返回今天的出色结果一样。
It used to be the case that if you searched on MSDN for "web service security", you'd find articles on WSE. That doesn't mean that WSE is not obsolete, and that nobody should use it unless they have no choices.
It just means that poor suckers who don't check the dates on articles and don't do good research from search results wind up creating new projects using WSE. I see it several times a month.
Search engines are quite as capable of returning you excellent results for five years ago as they are of returning excellent results for today.
因为 WCF 在 Web 上是这样称呼的，所以它不仅仅是 Web 服务。请注意 TLA 中的第二个字母。 :)
Because WCF is referred to as such on the web, seeing as it is not just web services. Note the second letter in the TLA. :)