Its should be ok, if you don't change anything of its source, IMHO.
Integrating CKEditor in commercial software, taking care of satisfying the Open Source licenses terms, while not able or interested on supporting CKEditor and its development.
I am not a lawyer, but the dual licensing model would appear to not prevent you from using the open source licensed CKEditor in your cms / client projects, as long as the terms of the chosen license are met.
What you cannot do is sell, give away or otherwise distribute the editor to third parties without providing them with access to the source code and the license attached to the product.
发布评论
评论（2）
恕我直言，如果您不更改其来源的任何内容，应该没问题。
Its should be ok, if you don't change anything of its source, IMHO.
我不是律师，但只要满足所选许可证的条款，双重许可模式似乎不会阻止您在 cms/客户端项目中使用开源许可的 CKEditor。
您不能将编辑器出售、赠送或以其他方式分发给第三方，而不向他们提供源代码和产品附带的许可证的访问权限。
I am not a lawyer, but the dual licensing model would appear to not prevent you from using the open source licensed CKEditor in your cms / client projects, as long as the terms of the chosen license are met.
What you cannot do is sell, give away or otherwise distribute the editor to third parties without providing them with access to the source code and the license attached to the product.