Flash Media Server VS Sip 服务器：VoIP 的差异
何时使用 Flash Media Server 以及何时使用 Sip 服务器？
有什么区别？
你会推荐什么？
。
谢谢 ;）
When using Flash Media Server and when using Sip Server ?
What is the difference ?
What would you recommend ?
.
Thanks ;)
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（1）
SIP 服务器是一个 VOIP 服务器，为客户端提供 VOIP 访问，用 java 为 xample 编写。
但由于 SIP 服务器通过 HTTP 连接，因此可以使用任何语言构建任何客户端并连接到服务器。 sip服务器的优点在于它的连接协议，它基于众所周知的http连接协议。 SIP 为您提供状态消息，就像您从 apache 中了解到的那样（例如 501、502、502...其中每个数字表示一个状态）。
另一方面，FMS 在最新版本中根据服务器类型，范围从流媒体服务器到具有交互功能的流服务器，例如实时文件共享、点对点连接和协作与视频会议。 FMS仅支持基于flash的rtmp连接协议进行连接。它为通道提供了加密协议 rtmpe。它还支持 TLS 安全性和基于角色的身份验证。 AC(++) 开发人员能够为 FMS 编写新插件。请参阅示例身份验证插件。
总体结论是，这两种服务器本质上是不同的，不能进行比较。每个服务器都有自己的目标组。 FMS有一个非常好的协作和交互API，并且在使用actionScript时非常出色。 RED5 等开源替代品也相当不错，值得一试。 RED5 真的很糟糕！
FMS 每年的费用约为 3500++，具体取决于您想要的连接数量。
对于SIP Server我没有直接的经验。另外，它可能取决于实现...但是，我只阅读了有关各种 SIP 服务器实现的好东西。
鉴于 FMS 中棘手的音频性能，最佳解决方案是为一个客户端提供两台服务器。由于 FMS 有一个 http webroot，所以 sip 服务器甚至可以集成到 fms 中...呃，对于 sourceforge / googleproject 来说这是一个多么好的主意...有人有兴趣这样做吗？我已经构建了一两个 FMS 应用程序，因此我可以处理 FMS 部分，我们现在需要的是一名 SIP 服务器开发人员；）
如果有人真的感兴趣，请给我发邮件到[电子邮件受保护]。
希望我能为您提供一些信息......
干杯
SIP Server is a VOIP Server that offers VOIP Access to clients, written for xample in java..
But since the SIP Server connects through HTTP one can build any client in any language and connect to the server. The advantage of the sip server is its connection protocol, which is based on the well known http connect protocol. SIP gives you status messages as you know them from apache ( e.g. 501 , 502, 502 ... where each number indicates a status ).
The FMS on the other hand is, in the newest version depending on the Server Type, a range between a Streaming Media Server up to a Streaming Server with interactive capabilities, such as realt-ime file sharing, peer-to-peer connections and collaboration with video conferencing. The FMS only suppports flash based rtmp connect protocol to connect. It offers a encryption protocoll for the channels, rtmpe. It also supports TLS security and role based authentication. A C(++) developer is able to code new plugins for FMS. See the sample authentication plugin.
Overall conclusion is, both servers are inherently different and not to be compared. Each server servers its own target group. The FMS has a very good Collaboration and Interaction API and is quite superb when using actionScript. The openSource alternatives such as RED5 are also quite good and worth checking out. Where RED5 is really the SHIT!!!
FMS costs about 3500 a year++ depending on how many connections you want.
For the SIP Server I have no direct experience. Also it probably depends on the implementation... However I have read only good things about various SIP Server implementations.
Given the tricky audio performance in FMS, the best solution would be to offer both servers to one client. Since the FMS has a http webroot a sip server may even be integrated into the fms ... UUh, what a nice idea for a sourceforge / googleproject... anybody interested in doing that? I have built one or two FMS applications so i can work on the fms part, all we need now is a SIP Server developer ;)
If someone is seriouskly interested drop me a mail to [email protected].
Hope I could help you with that bit of information...
Cheers