IBM的RTC和微软的TFS 2010
您认为最重要的差异是什么？
需要做出昂贵的决定...
信息：
- 我们有 Java 和 .NET 项目（还有很少的 .NET）
- 对项目生命周期管理非常感兴趣。
- 从 ClearCase 迁移
What in your view are the most important differences?
Need to make an expensive decision...
Information:
- We have both Java and .NET Projects (few more .NET)
- Very interested in project life cycle management.
- Migrating from ClearCase
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（5）
TFS 和 RTC 都是 CRRM 集成到开发环境（Visual Studio 或 Eclipse）中：它们提供：
区别主要在于它们的体系结构，其中：
两种 CRRM 工具中的挑战是管理您所必需的桥梁必须设置各种遗留工具（例如现有的票务系统）。
Both TFS and RTC are CRRM integrated to development environment (Visual Studio or Eclipse): they provide:
The difference is mainly in their architecture, where:
The challenge in both CRRM tools is to manage the necessary bridge you will have to setup for various legacy tools (like an existing ticket system for instance).
远离 Accurev，它是一场噩梦，作为一个每天都在与它战斗的开发者。 Git、Mercurial、Darcs 或 SVN 是更好的选择。就 Accurev 的所有“功能”而言，您可能永远不会错过它们，因为您会忙着说脏话。
Stay away from Accurev, it is a nightmare, as a developer with personal daily battles with it. Git, Mercurial, Darcs, or SVN are much better choices. As far as all of the "features" of Accurev, you likely won't ever miss them, you'll be too busy swearing.
RTC 适合 Visual Studio，TFS 适合 Eclipse：（
此处列出了 RTC Visual Studio 集成）
https://jazz.net/downloads/rational-team-concert/releases/3.0
（此处详细介绍了 TFS eclipse 集成）
http://teamrise.com/（由 MS 购买并重命名）
我个人更愿意使用 TFS，并且我以编写与版本控制系统的集成为生，并且已经接触过这两个系统深的方式。询问您是否想要详细信息。
如果您有选择的话，请选择 Mercurial。 Git 非常棒，但我发现 Windows 体验有所欠缺。获取一个单独的错误跟踪器。
如果您有选择但必须将版本控制与票证紧密集成，请尝试 http://fossil-scm.org/ - 尽管 IDE 集成根本不存在，但设置和维护的痛苦比 TFS 或 RTC 要少得多。但它在核心功能上与它们竞争激烈，下载量约为 1 MB。
RTC is Visual Studio friendly, and TFS is Eclipse friendly:
(RTC visual studio integration listed here)
https://jazz.net/downloads/rational-team-concert/releases/3.0
(TFS eclipse integration detailed here)
http://teamprise.com/ (purchased and renamed by MS)
I'd personally rather work with TFS, and I write integrations with version control systems for a living, and have touched both of these systems in a deep way. Ask if you want the details.
If you have a choice in the matter, go with Mercurial. Git is fantastic, but I found the Windows experience lacking. Get a separate bug tracker.
If you have a choice but must have version control integrated tightly with tickets, try http://fossil-scm.org/ - far less pain than either TFS or RTC to setup and maintain, though the IDE integration simply does not exist. But it competes solidly on core features with them in about 1 megabyte of download.
TFS 还没有对 eclipse 或任何此类编辑器的任何支持（它们即将推出，但还没有消息）。因此，您在 Java 项目中使用哪个编辑器在这里很重要。但是微软正在推出 teamprise，它可以让你连接 TFS（它可以更好地为你的 java+.net 工作）
当然对于.net项目，TFS是最好的，eclipse对.net/c#的支持很差，我们正在使用 TFS，对 2010 年感到非常满意。
我认为RTC 不知道对 .net 编辑器（VS 或您喜欢的任何其他编辑器）有多少支持，但是使用 TFS，您当然可以使 .NET 项目工作得很好，并且您可以找到 Teamprise + TFS 也可以与 eclipse 一起使用。
TFS doesnt have any support for eclipse or any such editors yet, (they are about to come, but no news yet). So which editor you use for your java projects that matters here. But Microsoft is coming up with teamprise which can let you connect TFS (which can work better for your java+.net)
And ofcourse for .net projects, TFS is the best, eclipse support for .net/c# is bad, we are using TFS and am lot happy with 2010.
I think for RTC dont know how much support is there for .net editors (VS or any other you prefer) but with TFS, you can certainly make .NET project work great and you can find Teamprise + TFS to work with eclipse also.
这真的是一个问题吗？不是唠叨，而是你的工具堆栈是什么。我们谈论什么版本？ （请注意，Visual Studio 2010 和 TFS 2010 即将推出 - 两者都好得多，仍然可用于 .NET 2.0 以上）。
如果没有更多信息，您会得到大量愚蠢的小功能列表 - 因为我们不知道如何在大局中正确回答。这就像“BMW 3 和 Mercedes SLK 之间的所有区别是什么”——无数的小事情，无数的相关事情，但你想要什么？ ;)
Is it really a question? Not nagging, but what is your toolstack to start with. What versions we talk about? (note Visual Studio 2010 and TFS 2010 are just around the corners - both a lot better, still usable for .NET 2.0 upward).
Without more information you get tons of idiotic little feature lists - because we dont know how to answer properly in the big picture. This is like "what are all the differences between a BMW 3 and a Mercedes SLK" - TONS of small things, TONS of relevant things, but what do you want? ;)