有使用 CryptoObfuscator 或 CryptoLicensing 的经验吗？
我正在市场上寻找一个好的（而且便宜的）.Net 混淆器。 我正在开发一个.Net Windows 窗体应用程序。
到目前为止，我评估了 IntelliLock 和 SmartAssebly。 我因缺乏支持而退出了第一封邮件（我发送了两封电子邮件，但没有回复，没有支持网站等）。 SmartAssebly 看起来不错，但对我来说太丰富了。
有人用过 CryptoObfuscator 吗？有什么好的或不好的经历吗？
有一次，我有你在这里，加密许可怎么样？
谢谢
I'm on the market for a good (and cheap) .Net obfuscator.
I'm developing a .Net windows forms application.
I evaluated IntelliLock and SmartAssebly so far.
I quit the first on lack of support (I sent two emails with no response, no support site, etc).
SmartAssebly looks pretty good but is too rich for my blood.
Has anyone used CryptoObfuscator? Any good or bad experiences?
Once, I have you here, what about CryptoLicensing?
Thanks
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（4）
您可以查看 Roy Osherove 关于 Crypto 的帖子去年六月开始授权。 Roy 是我工作的公司的研发副总裁，我很欣赏他的意见，我们认真考虑使用这两个我们未来产品中的工具。
You can check Roy Osherove post on Crypto Licensing from last June. Roy is the VP R&D at the company I work in and I appreciate his opinion, we seriously consider using these two tools in our future products.
我已经使用 CryptoLicensing 和 CryptoObfuscator 一年多了，发现它们都是非常好的产品，而且价格也不错。不要以为混淆器很贵就一定更好！检查此线程以进行混淆器的比较：
https:// /stackoverflow.com/questions/337134/what-is-the-best-net-obfuscator-on-the-market/1543040
我也使用 CryptoLicensing，并且会说它与他们的混淆器相同 - 它很好并且针对不同场景具有灵活性。它还提供了对常见场景的开箱即用支持。
我唯一想说的不好的是他们的用户界面还需要改进一下。除此之外，它们是非常强大的产品，具有良好的文档和良好的电子邮件支持。我也从我的构建过程中运行混淆器，它很有效。
I've been using CryptoLicensing and CryptoObfuscator for over a year now and have found them both to be very good products with good price points. Don't think that because an obfuscator is expensive it's got to be better either! Check this thread for a comparison of obfuscators:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/337134/what-is-the-best-net-obfuscator-on-the-market/1543040
I use CryptoLicensing too and would say the same about it as their obfuscator - it's good and has flexibility for different scenarios. It also comes with support for common scenarios out of the box.
The only thing I'd say bad is that their UI could do with a bit of a polish. Other than that they're very strong products with good documenation and good email support. I run the obfuscator from my build process too and it works a treat.
使用加密混淆器已有几个月了 - 我发现它非常容易使用，而且他们的支持邮件非常有帮助。在 ILDASM、Reflector ILSPY 或 JustDecompile 等常用工具上，输出并不稳定（但我不是黑客）。
然而，有一天，我的杀毒软件 Avast 杀死了混淆器输出（处于萌芽状态）。向 Avast 投诉为误报，后来更新后问题就消失了。怀疑控制流混淆选项，但无法确定。
我的软件具有自动更新功能，并会创建可被 AV 阻止的更新的 exe。
因此，在 AV 制造商检查您的声明期间，您的客户可能会面临无法获得更新的风险，并且新客户也无法安装。
似乎如果您的软件经过代码签名，您就不会收到此类警报：请参阅此
http://wyday.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1& ;t=21786
希望这对今天的读者有所帮助。
User of crypto obfuscator for un couple of months - I find it quite easy to use and their support mail very helpful. The output is not understable on usual tools like ILDASM, Reflector ILSPY or JustDecompile (but I'm no hacker).
However, one day my antivirus Avast killed the obfuscator output (in the bud). Complained to Avast as false positive and it went away with later updates. Suspect the Control Flow Obfuscation option but can't be sure.
My software has automatic update and creates updated exe which can be blocked by the AV.
So your customers may risk not getting updates, and new customers can't install, while the AV manufacturer checks your claims.
It seems that if your software is code signed, you don't get such alerts: see this
http://wyday.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=21786
Hope this helps today's readers.
我对这个产品的问题是定价，如果你选择 12 个月的升级或许可证续订，那么它的价格要高出约 259 美元，这对于 649 美元的产品来说是很多钱。另外，如果您进行研究，该产品过去曾出现过一些错误，这让我保持警惕。
仔细看看 Babel .NET 混淆器。它的免费版本仍然非常好，并且是少数几个在您决定购买时不会将您锁定在一台机器上的版本之一。如果您可以仅使用命令行，这可能是我发现的最好的。
The problem I have with this product is the pricing if you go with the 12 months upgrades or license renewal it costs about $259 more that's a lot for a $649 product. Also if you do your research the product had a few goof ups in the past that make me wary.
Take a good look at Babel .NET obfuscator. It's free version is still very good and one of the few that don't lock you to one machine if you decide to purchase. Its possibly the best I found if you can get over using the command line only.