Cornerstone 与 Mac OS X 版本
我在命令行上使用 svn 已有 5 年多了，但我正在考虑切换到 GUI。 Mac 颠覆应用程序的两个王者似乎是 Versions 和 基石。我看到的大多数比较两者的评论/评论都可以追溯到 2008 年，当时 Cornerstone 首次发布。现在已经是 2010 年了，这两款应用程序都发生了重大变化。
过去一周我一直在运行这两个应用程序的试用版，但我仍然无法下定决心。您会推荐哪一个，为什么？
I've been using svn on the command line for 5+ years, but I'm thinking of switching to GUI. The two kings of Mac subversion apps seem to be Versions and Cornerstone. Most of the reviews/comments I've seen comparing the two are from way back in 2008, when Cornerstone was first released. It's now 2010, and both apps have undergone significant changes.
I've been running trial copies of both apps for the past week, and I still can't make up my mind. Which would you recommend and why?
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（14）
Cornerstone 已经推出几年了，第二版刚刚发布。它现在是迄今为止最有价值、速度最快且功能丰富的 Mac Subversion 客户端。仅合并功能和注释就很棒。我从来没有见过如此酷的方式，你可以在比较时单击一个文本块，并在一个令人惊叹的用户界面中显示该块的日志消息以及你需要的所有统计信息，太棒了。
说真的，我极力推荐这个工具。它与版本不同。
Cornerstone has been out a few years and version 2 was just released. It is now by far the best value, fastest and feature rich Subversion client for the Mac. The merge features and annotations alone are awesome. I have never seen such a cool take on either of them and the way you can just click a block of text when comparing and have the log message displayed for that block together with all the statistical information you'll ever need in a stunning UI, it's just awesome.
Seriously I can't recommend this tool enough. It is in a different league to Versions.
我已经尝试过这两种方法，并且更喜欢 Cornerstone，主要是因为它具有更优越的文件差异界面。
使用 Cornerstone，您可以双击提交列表中的任何文件，它会立即显示您的版本与存储库版本的差异。这使得在签入之前快速对更改进行代码审查变得非常容易。
据我所知，对于版本，您必须按 Ctrl-D，然后按比较，然后等待几秒钟，然后才能加载版本差异工具。
I've tried both and like Cornerstone better, mainly because it has a far superior file-diff interface.
With Cornerstone, you can double-click on any file in your commit-list and it instantly brings up a diff of your version vs the repository version. This makes it very easy to quickly code-review your changes before checking in.
With Versions, as far as I can tell, you have to hit Ctrl-D, then hit Compare, and then wait a good few seconds before it loads up the diff tool.
阅读本文并查看 CornerStone 2.0 和版本后，Corner Stone 凭借其文件比较的简单性而获胜。
对于版本，我必须下载或安装 XCode（或其他东西）。 Cornerstone 内置了它，根据我的口味，Cornerstones 文件比较是我见过的对于普通用户来说最好的。添加和删除的内容立即一目了然。
我还没有尝试过分支和合并，但似乎基石已经做出了巨大的推动。
After reading this and looking at CornerStone 2.0 and Versions, Corner Stone won on just the simplicity of their file compare.
With versions I have to download or install XCode (or something else). Cornerstone had it built in, and for my tastes the Cornerstones file compare is the best I've seen for a casual user. It's just immediately clear what was added and deleted.
I haven't tried the branch and merge but it seems Cornerstone has made that a big push.
我想添加 Cornerstone 2 现在有分支 &合并，这是版本上真正的1-up。令人恼火的是，我在发布之前购买了版本，所以我感到有点刺痛:-(
I'd like to add Cornerstone 2 now has branch & merge, which is a real 1-up on Versions. Irritatingly I bought Versions just before that release so I feel a little stung :-(
几年前我购买了 Cornerstone，主要是因为我听说了他们的支持。我曾多次联系支持人员，一次或两次是因为错误，多次是提出问题。他们总是非常敏感，我对我的选择很满意。
如果您是学生，Cornerstone 还可以享受很好的教育折扣。
我确实希望在查看文件夹的历史记录时，您可以像在 Windows 上的 Tortoise 中一样查看该文件夹中各个文件的更改。
I purchased Cornerstone several years ago, primarily because I had heard good things about their support. I have contacted support several times, once or twice with bugs and several times to ask questions. They were always very responsive, and I've been happy with my choice.
Cornerstone also has a good educational discount if you're a student.
I do wish that when viewing the history of a folder you could view the changes to individual files within that folder the way you can in Tortoise on Windows.
我更喜欢版本 GUI。 Cornerstone 有更多功能，但我不需要它们，所以它们往往会妨碍我。
另外，万花筒是一个很棒的文本比较工具，它们可以完美地协同工作。
我希望 XCode 4 会让这两者都过时……也许有一天（叹气）。
I like Versions GUI more. Cornerstone has more features, but I don't NEED them, so they tend to get in the way.
Plus Kaleidoscope is an AWESOME text comparison tool and they work beautifully together.
I was hoping that XCode 4 would make both obsolete... maybe one day (sigh).
基石赢了。我们做了一次猛烈的打击，基石 1.5 对于我们经验丰富的团队成员和生产工程师（更休闲的 SVN 人员）来说要好得多
Cornerstone won. We did a smack down and cornerstone 1.5 was far better both for our experienced team members and our production engineers ( more casual SVNers )
Cornerstone 不进行 svn 合并。对我来说，这是一个交易杀手（将分支的修订合并到主干中？不）。
如果您所需要做的就是提交、浏览和结帐，那么 Cornerstone 很性感且很棒，我比版本更喜欢 UI。
对于日常使用——分支、标记、合并——我最喜欢 SmartSVN，它是跨平台的。 UI 没那么性感。
Cornerstone doesn't do svn merges. For me that's a deal killer (merging revisions from a a branch into the trunk? nope).
If all you need to do is commit and browse and checkout, Cornerstone is sexy and awesome, I like the UI better than Versions.
For daily usage -- branching, tagging, merging -- I like SmartSVN best and it's cross platform. UI isn't as sexy.
在花了几天时间与竞争产品所包含的版本进行评估后，我们刚刚购买了 Cornerstone 2 的 15 个许可证。值得一提的是，《基石 2》与其他所有游戏都属于不同的联盟。整个应用程序的构思非常巧妙，常常令人难以置信。从浏览工作副本到出色的合并支持，它只是没有变得更好。它超级快且易于使用。值得一提的是注释，这使得竞赛所做的其他一切看起来过时且蹩脚。继续 Zennaware 的出色工作。
We just bought 15 licenses of Cornerstone 2 after spending a few days evaluating it against the competing products included Versions. Save to say, Cornerstone 2 is in a different league to everything else. The entire application has been so well conceived it often boggles the mind. From browsing your working copy to awesome merge support, it just does not get any better. It's super fast and easy to use. Worth mentioning are the annotations as well, which make everything else the competition has done look dated and lame. Keep up the amazing work Zennaware.
我尝试了基石2和版本。
最后我选择了基石 2，因为它提供了更直观的工作流程。您可以轻松添加文件，apple + Enter 查看差异，然后 apple + t 提交。我发现在基石中查看差异信息更容易，如果有意义的话，感觉更像是苹果应用程序。
I tried both cornerstone 2 and versions.
In the end I went with cornerstone 2 as it provided a more intuitive workflow. You can easily add a file, apple + enter to see the diff and then apple + t to commit. I found it easier to see the diff information in cornerstone and it felt more like an apple application if that makes sense.
另一个考虑因素是 SVN 1.7 支持。 Cornerstone 自 2012 年 2 月中旬起就有了此功能。版本中何时支持此功能尚无官方日期。
--叹气-- 我拥有版本，但本周将购买基石，因为我不能再等待了。
Another consideration is SVN 1.7 support. Cornerstone has had this feature since mid February, 2012. No official date for when this will be supported in Versions.
--sigh-- I own Versions, but will be purchasing Cornerstone this week because I just can't wait any longer.
Cornerstone 为 diff 找了这样一个让人看着很痛苦的借口。等不及试用期结束并继续测试其他东西。
Cornerstone has such an excuse for diff that is painful to watch. Can't wait for trial to expire and move on, testing something else.
尝试一下 SmartSvn，它比其他任何一个都有更多的功能和更强大的方式。我也使用 svnx，但是 UI 很糟糕。
Try SmartSvn, it has much more features and way more powerful then any of those. I also use svnx, however the UI is awful.
我使用版本是因为它适合我的需求，在购买之前我什至从未听说过基石。
如果您无法下定决心，这可能意味着两者都足够适合您，因此请选择最便宜的选项，或提供最好支持的选项。 （我不知道两者的支持如何，从来不需要任何支持）
I'm using versions because it suits my needs and I never even heard of cornerstone before i bought it.
If you cannot make up your mind that probably means that both work well enough for you, so go with the cheapes option, or the one with the best support. (i have no idea how the support on either is, never needed any)