JBoss RichFaces vs IceFaces vs Apache Trinidad - JSF 组件库比较
您认为/使用什么接口层？ “支持”层将是 Spring 3。 标准是：
- 您的个人意见
- 组件
- 文档
- AJAX 集成
- 浏览器支持
- 社区
- 工具支持（Eclipse、NetBeans）
我找到了一些比较主题，但都是关于 2007 年和旧版本的。
What do you think/use for interface layer? The "backing" layer will be Spring 3.
The criteria are :
- Your private opinion
- Components
- Documentation
- AJAX Integration
- Browser support
- Community
- Tool support (Eclipse, NetBeans)
I found some comparison topics but it was about 2007 and old versions.
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（4）
我更喜欢 RichFaces。但请记住，如果您需要某个组件，您可以一次使用所有这些组件。
我还没有使用过另外两个，但我已经详细研究过它们以便进行选择。
也就是说，您还可以看看 Primefaces - 它有组件也非常好。并强调这一点 - 所有组件库都可以一起使用。
I'd prefer RichFaces. But have in mind that you can use all of them at once, if you need a certain component.
I haven't used the other two, but I have looked into them in details in order to choose.
That said, you can also take a look at Primefaces - it has really good components as well. And to emphasize this - all component libraries can be used together.
我只与特立尼达和 Richfaces 合作过。两者我都喜欢，但我更喜欢特立尼达。可能是因为我用它工作的次数比较多，所以感觉更舒服。特立尼达在线文档也足够好。
Trinidad 和 RF 都有一个很长的组件库。您可以检查这些链接，了解哪些组件对您的应用程序有用。我在最近开发的一个应用程序中使用了 Trinidad 树，它很容易使用和填充： Trinidad 组件 - RichFaces 组件（需要登录）
关于换肤我觉得Trinidad默认皮肤比 RichFaces 更基本，但我认为两者都有办法让它们像你的 CSS 技能允许的那样漂亮。
我认为 RichFaces 拥有更成熟的 AJAX 集成，并且它们的 AJAX 组件和事件对我来说比 Trinidad 的更容易使用。
I have worked only with Trinidad and Richfaces. I like both but I would give the edge to Trinidad. It may be because I have worked with it more and I feel more comfortable with it. Trinidad online documentation is also good enough.
Both Trinidad and RF have a lenghty component library. You can check those links to see what components you will find useful to your application. I have used Trinidad tree in one recent application I developed and it was easy to use and fill: Trinidad components - RichFaces components (login required)
Regarding skinning I feel Trinidad default skinning to be more basic than RichFaces one but I think both have ways to make them as beautiful as your CSS skills allow you.
I think RichFaces has a more mature AJAX integration and their AJAX components and events are more easy to use for me than Trinidad ones.
我更喜欢丰富的面孔。我在当前的项目中使用了 Ice Faces，但由于社区较小，很难获得社区支持。在这种情况下，丰富的面孔是好的。
I would prefer Rich Faces. I use Ice Faces in my current project, but it is difficulat to get the community support because of the small community. In that case rich faces is good.
我在我的一个项目中使用了 richfaces，在当前的项目中我使用了icefaces。我认为 RichFaces 是更好的选择，原因如下：
冰面人。 Icefaces有很多
错误。
比 Icefaces 更重要的社区
I have used richfaces in one of my project and in the current project I am using icefaces. I feel RichFaces would be the better option because of the following reasons:
the Icefaces. Icefaces has lot of
bugs.
community than Icefaces