Joiner 线程安全吗?

发布于 2024-08-24 03:20:29 字数 23 浏览 6 评论 0原文

谷歌收藏Joiner线程安全吗?

Is google collections Joiner thread safe?

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论(2

孤独患者 2024-08-31 03:20:29

是的!我们不会重复 SimpleDateFormat 的错误。 :-)

Joiner 需要接收与其姊妹类 Splitter 类似的文档升级,其中表示:

* <p><b>Warning: splitter instances are always immutable</b>; a configuration
* method such as {@code omitEmptyStrings} has no effect on the instance it
* is invoked on! You must store and use the new splitter instance returned by
* the method. This makes splitters thread-safe, and safe to store as {@code
* static final} constants . . .

Yes! We're not about to repeat the mistakes of SimpleDateFormat. :-)

Joiner needs to receive a similar documentation upgrade to what its sister class Splitter got, which says:

* <p><b>Warning: splitter instances are always immutable</b>; a configuration
* method such as {@code omitEmptyStrings} has no effect on the instance it
* is invoked on! You must store and use the new splitter instance returned by
* the method. This makes splitters thread-safe, and safe to store as {@code
* static final} constants . . .
甚是思念 2024-08-31 03:20:29

它唯一的状态是 a

  private final String separator;

所以是的,它是线程安全的。

Its only state is a

  private final String separator;

So yes it's threadsafe.

~没有更多了~
我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
原文