在 boost.interprocess 中从共享内存进行 memcpy 的问题
这让我沮丧得发疯。我只是想创建一个共享内存缓冲区类,该类在通过 Boost.Interprocess 创建的共享内存中使用,我可以在其中读取/存储数据。我编写了以下代码来测试功能
#include <boost/interprocess/shared_memory_object.hpp>
#include <boost/interprocess/mapped_region.hpp>
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
using namespace boost::interprocess;
int main( int argc, char* argv[] ) {
shared_memory_object::remove( "MyName" );
// Create a shared memory object
shared_memory_object shm ( create_only, "MyName", read_write );
// Set size for the shared memory region
shm.truncate(1000);
// Map the whole shared memory in this process
mapped_region region(shm, read_write);
// Get pointer to the beginning of the mapped shared memory region
int* start_ptr;
start_ptr = static_cast<int*>(region.get_address());
// Write data into the buffer
int* write_ptr = start_ptr;
for( int i= 0; i<10; i++ ) {
cout << "Write data: " << i << endl;
memcpy( write_ptr, &i, sizeof(int) );
write_ptr++;
}
// Read data from the buffer
int* read_ptr = start_ptr;
int* data;
for( int i= 0; i<10; i++ ) {
memcpy( data, read_ptr, sizeof(int) );
cout << "Read data: " << *data << endl;
read_ptr++;
}
shared_memory_object::remove( "MyName" );
return 0;
}
当我运行它时,它会正常写入数据,但在读取循环中的第一个 memcpy
上出现段错误。 gdb 说如下:
程序收到信号EXC_BAD_ACCESS,无法访问内存。 原因:KERN_INVALID_ADDRESS,地址:0x0000000000000000 __memcpy () 中的 0x00007fffffe007c5
(gdb) 其中
__memcpy () 中的 #0 0x00007fffffe007c5 #1 0x0000000100000e45 in main (argc=1, argv=0x7fff5fbff9d0) at try.cpp:36
功能非常简单,我不知道我错过了什么。任何帮助将不胜感激。
This is driving me wild with frustration. I am just trying to create a shared memory buffer class that uses in shared memory created through Boost.Interprocess where I can read/store data. I wrote the following to test the functionality
#include <boost/interprocess/shared_memory_object.hpp>
#include <boost/interprocess/mapped_region.hpp>
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
using namespace boost::interprocess;
int main( int argc, char* argv[] ) {
shared_memory_object::remove( "MyName" );
// Create a shared memory object
shared_memory_object shm ( create_only, "MyName", read_write );
// Set size for the shared memory region
shm.truncate(1000);
// Map the whole shared memory in this process
mapped_region region(shm, read_write);
// Get pointer to the beginning of the mapped shared memory region
int* start_ptr;
start_ptr = static_cast<int*>(region.get_address());
// Write data into the buffer
int* write_ptr = start_ptr;
for( int i= 0; i<10; i++ ) {
cout << "Write data: " << i << endl;
memcpy( write_ptr, &i, sizeof(int) );
write_ptr++;
}
// Read data from the buffer
int* read_ptr = start_ptr;
int* data;
for( int i= 0; i<10; i++ ) {
memcpy( data, read_ptr, sizeof(int) );
cout << "Read data: " << *data << endl;
read_ptr++;
}
shared_memory_object::remove( "MyName" );
return 0;
}
When I run this, it writes the data OK, but segfaults on the first memcpy
in the read loop. gdb says the following:
Program received signal EXC_BAD_ACCESS, Could not access memory.
Reason: KERN_INVALID_ADDRESS at address: 0x0000000000000000
0x00007fffffe007c5 in __memcpy ()(gdb) where
#0 0x00007fffffe007c5 in __memcpy ()
#1 0x0000000100000e45 in main (argc=1, argv=0x7fff5fbff9d0) at try.cpp:36
The functionality is so simple, I don't know what I'm missing. Any help will be much appreciated.
如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱,如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论,将不能在第一时间通知您!
发布评论
评论(2)
data
未设置为指向任何内容。 (确保在启用所有警告的情况下编译程序。)无论如何,它看起来都不应该是一个指针。第二个循环也许应该是:
data
isn't being set to point at anything. (Make sure the program is being compiled with all warnings enabled.) It looks like it shouldn't be a pointer anyway.The second loop should perhaps be:
我无法在这里测试它,因为我没有可用的
boost
但我有猜测。在此 示例,shared_memory_object
对象首先使用create_only
标志进行写入。然后使用带有标志
open_only
的第二个shared_memory_object
对象读取它:看来您必须将
shared_memory_object
更改为正确的标志。I can't test it here because I don't have
boost
available but I a have guess. In this example,the
shared_memory_object
object is first used to write with a flagcreate_only
.Then it is read with a second
shared_memory_object
object with a flagopen_only
:It seems you have to change your
shared_memory_object
to a proper flag.