需要一些帮助来解释 tcpdump 输出

发布于 2024-08-22 20:33:41 字数 3108 浏览 6 评论 0原文

我检查了 tcpdump 手册页,并认为我理解那里提供的示例。但我得到的是我无法完全理解的东西。

原始:模拟器输出

LINE 1: 20:01:13.442111 IP 10.0.0.1.12345 > 10.0.0.2.54321: S 1234:1234(0) win 65535
LINE 2: 20:01:13.471705 IP 10.0.0.2.54321 > 10.0.0.1.12345: S 4321:4321(0) ack 1235 win 65535
LINE 3: 20:01:13.497389 IP 10.0.0.1.14640 > 10.0.0.2.12756: . ack 4322 win 65535
LINE 4: 20:01:13.497422 IP 10.0.0.1.12345 > 10.0.0.2.54321: . 1235:2682(1447) win 65535
LINE 5: 20:01:14.023273 IP 10.0.0.2.12756 > 10.0.0.1.14640: . ack 5768 win 65535

这就是我的理解:

LINE 1: 1 sends 2 0 bytes starting with SEQ number 1234
LINE 2: 2 sends 1 0 bytes starting with SEQ number 4321 and an ACK = (1's SEQ + 1) i.e. 1235
LINE 3: 1 sends 2 0 bytes with an ACK = (2's SEQ + 1) i.e. 4322
LINE 4: 1 sends 2 1447 bytes starting with SEQ number 1235 until 2682 (1447 bytes in total)
LINE 5: 2 sends 1 0 bytes with an ACK = 5768? What is this number? Isn't it supposed to be 2683?

也许我错过了一些太明显的东西。有人可以指出吗?

编辑1:模拟器输出(grepped一个连接信息)

20:01:13.442111 IP 10.0.0.1.12345 > 10.0.0.2.54321: S 1234:1234(0) win 65535
20:01:13.471705 IP 10.0.0.2.54321 > 10.0.0.1.12345: S 4321:4321(0) ack 1235 win 65535
20:01:13.497422 IP 10.0.0.1.12345 > 10.0.0.2.54321: . 1235:2682(1447) win 65535
20:01:14.573322 IP 10.0.0.2.54321 > 10.0.0.1.12345: . ack 5981 win 65535
20:01:14.593870 IP 10.0.0.1.12345 > 10.0.0.2.54321: . 4129:5576(1447) win 65535
20:01:14.639457 IP 10.0.0.1.12345 > 10.0.0.2.54321: . 7023:8470(1447) win 65535
20:01:14.639606 IP 10.0.0.1.12345 > 10.0.0.2.54321: . 9917:10640(723) win 65535
20:01:14.660971 IP 10.0.0.2.54321 > 10.0.0.1.12345: . ack 11769 win 65535
20:01:14.693847 IP 10.0.0.1.12345 > 10.0.0.2.54321: . 12087:13534(1447) win 65535
20:01:14.726564 IP 10.0.0.2.54321 > 10.0.0.1.12345: . ack 15964 win 65535

问题: ACK似乎仍然不同。它是 5981 而不是 2683。

编辑 2:真实 TCP 输出

22:20:14.492625 IP 72.14.204.99.80 > 10.0.2.15.59745: S 255616001:255616001(0) ack 1727704513 win 65535 <mss 1460>
22:20:14.495606 IP 10.0.2.15.59745 > 72.14.204.99.80: . ack 255616002 win 5840
22:20:14.501015 IP 10.0.2.15.59745 > 72.14.204.99.80: P 1727704513:1727705327(814) ack 255616002 win 5840
22:20:14.501746 IP 72.14.204.99.80 > 10.0.2.15.59745: . ack 1727705327 win 65535
22:20:14.562197 IP 72.14.204.99.80 > 10.0.2.15.59745: P 255616002:255616102(100) ack 1727705327 win 65535
22:20:14.562298 IP 10.0.2.15.59745 > 72.14.204.99.80: . ack 255616102 win 5840
22:20:14.630749 IP 10.0.2.15.59745 > 72.14.204.99.80: P 1727705327:1727706096(769) ack 255616102 win 5840
22:20:14.631228 IP 72.14.204.99.80 > 10.0.2.15.59745: . ack 1727706096 win 65535
22:20:14.692324 IP 72.14.204.99.80 > 10.0.2.15.59745: P 255616102:255616338(236) ack 1727706096 win 65535
22:20:14.692361 IP 10.0.2.15.59745 > 72.14.204.99.80: . ack 255616338 win 6432

问题:我尝试按照您的建议并 grep'ed 一个连接的输出。但这一次,为什么是ACK而不是SEQ+1呢?

I've checked the tcpdump man page and thought I understood the example provided there. But the one that I am getting is something I'm not able to understand completely.

ORIGINAL: Simulator Output

LINE 1: 20:01:13.442111 IP 10.0.0.1.12345 > 10.0.0.2.54321: S 1234:1234(0) win 65535
LINE 2: 20:01:13.471705 IP 10.0.0.2.54321 > 10.0.0.1.12345: S 4321:4321(0) ack 1235 win 65535
LINE 3: 20:01:13.497389 IP 10.0.0.1.14640 > 10.0.0.2.12756: . ack 4322 win 65535
LINE 4: 20:01:13.497422 IP 10.0.0.1.12345 > 10.0.0.2.54321: . 1235:2682(1447) win 65535
LINE 5: 20:01:14.023273 IP 10.0.0.2.12756 > 10.0.0.1.14640: . ack 5768 win 65535

This is what I understand:

LINE 1: 1 sends 2 0 bytes starting with SEQ number 1234
LINE 2: 2 sends 1 0 bytes starting with SEQ number 4321 and an ACK = (1's SEQ + 1) i.e. 1235
LINE 3: 1 sends 2 0 bytes with an ACK = (2's SEQ + 1) i.e. 4322
LINE 4: 1 sends 2 1447 bytes starting with SEQ number 1235 until 2682 (1447 bytes in total)
LINE 5: 2 sends 1 0 bytes with an ACK = 5768? What is this number? Isn't it supposed to be 2683?

Maybe I am missing something too obvious. Can someone point it out please?

EDIT 1: Simulator output (grepped one connection info)

20:01:13.442111 IP 10.0.0.1.12345 > 10.0.0.2.54321: S 1234:1234(0) win 65535
20:01:13.471705 IP 10.0.0.2.54321 > 10.0.0.1.12345: S 4321:4321(0) ack 1235 win 65535
20:01:13.497422 IP 10.0.0.1.12345 > 10.0.0.2.54321: . 1235:2682(1447) win 65535
20:01:14.573322 IP 10.0.0.2.54321 > 10.0.0.1.12345: . ack 5981 win 65535
20:01:14.593870 IP 10.0.0.1.12345 > 10.0.0.2.54321: . 4129:5576(1447) win 65535
20:01:14.639457 IP 10.0.0.1.12345 > 10.0.0.2.54321: . 7023:8470(1447) win 65535
20:01:14.639606 IP 10.0.0.1.12345 > 10.0.0.2.54321: . 9917:10640(723) win 65535
20:01:14.660971 IP 10.0.0.2.54321 > 10.0.0.1.12345: . ack 11769 win 65535
20:01:14.693847 IP 10.0.0.1.12345 > 10.0.0.2.54321: . 12087:13534(1447) win 65535
20:01:14.726564 IP 10.0.0.2.54321 > 10.0.0.1.12345: . ack 15964 win 65535

Question: The ACK still seems to be different. It is 5981 instead of 2683.

EDIT 2: Real TCP output

22:20:14.492625 IP 72.14.204.99.80 > 10.0.2.15.59745: S 255616001:255616001(0) ack 1727704513 win 65535 <mss 1460>
22:20:14.495606 IP 10.0.2.15.59745 > 72.14.204.99.80: . ack 255616002 win 5840
22:20:14.501015 IP 10.0.2.15.59745 > 72.14.204.99.80: P 1727704513:1727705327(814) ack 255616002 win 5840
22:20:14.501746 IP 72.14.204.99.80 > 10.0.2.15.59745: . ack 1727705327 win 65535
22:20:14.562197 IP 72.14.204.99.80 > 10.0.2.15.59745: P 255616002:255616102(100) ack 1727705327 win 65535
22:20:14.562298 IP 10.0.2.15.59745 > 72.14.204.99.80: . ack 255616102 win 5840
22:20:14.630749 IP 10.0.2.15.59745 > 72.14.204.99.80: P 1727705327:1727706096(769) ack 255616102 win 5840
22:20:14.631228 IP 72.14.204.99.80 > 10.0.2.15.59745: . ack 1727706096 win 65535
22:20:14.692324 IP 72.14.204.99.80 > 10.0.2.15.59745: P 255616102:255616338(236) ack 1727706096 win 65535
22:20:14.692361 IP 10.0.2.15.59745 > 72.14.204.99.80: . ack 255616338 win 6432

Question: I tried as per your suggestion and grep'ed one connection's output. But this time, why is the ACK the way it is instead of SEQ+1?

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论(1

月隐月明月朦胧 2024-08-29 20:33:41

从端口号来看,LINE1、LINE2、LINE5 属于一个会话,而 LINE2、LINE4 则属于另一个会话。

我强烈建议您使用 tcpdump 捕获数据包,并使用wireshark工具分析结果,而不是使用 tcpdump 进行数据包分析。

编辑:
对于模拟器流来说,它很混乱。自 10.0.0.1 -> 10.0.0.2的数据包序列号不完整,所以我认为可能有一些数据包没有被捕获,并且计时不显示真实状态。所以你可以忽略它。

对于真正的流来说,这是可以的。对于syn数据包,ack回复=seq+1;对于内容发送,ack = seq + len。直播实际上向我们展示了这一点。

check from the port number, It seems that LINE1, LINE2 and LINE5 belong to one session while LINE2 and LINE4 is in another session.

Instead using tcpdump for packet analysis, I highly suggest you to capture packets with tcpdump, and analyze the result with wireshark tool.

EDIT:
For the simulator stream, it mess up. Since the 10.0.0.1 -> 10.0.0.2's packets's sequence numbers is not completely, so I think maybe there some packet did not be captured and the timing is not show the real status. so you can ignore it.

For the real stream, it is okay. For syn packet, ack reply = seq +1; for content sending, ack = seq + len. The stream actually show this to us.

~没有更多了~
我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
原文