Dropbox 是一个有效的快速但肮脏的源代码控制解决方案吗？
I see many CS students who use Dropbox as an alternative to real SC systems due to its ease of use.
Do you use Dropbox as a quick-and-dirty source control solution? Is this a valid use for it?
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（6）
不一定，但 Dropbox 可能会与 GIT 合作。对于想要在多台开发机器上工作的单个开发人员场景，我认为这会很好用。
Not really, but Dropbox in concert with GIT, maybe. For a single developer scenario where you want to work on more than one development machine, I think this would work just fine.
我认为作为一种快速而肮脏的方法，是的，它很好。每个人似乎都没有意识到 Dropbox 确实会保存您的文件历史记录。
不过，您无法轻松返回到以前的项目状态，只能返回到单个文件的以前状态。
所以是的，如果你想要非常快并且非常肮脏，那就去做吧。
I think as a quick and dirty approach, yes, it's fine. What everybody seems to not realise is that Dropbox does save the history of your files.
You wouldn't be able to easily go back to a previous project state though, just a previous state of individual files.
So yes, if you want VERY quick and VEEERRRRY dirty, then go for it.
Linux 内核很长一段时间都是通过补丁文件开发的，而且它确实有效。
我想说任何有效的解决方案都是“有效的”——是否推荐、良好实践等完全是另一回事。我会亲自将他们指向 github，设置一个 git 服务器（非常容易做到）或一个 SVN 服务器。我还要求他们提供提交日志。
The Linux kernel was developed via patch files for a long time and it worked.
I'd say any solution that works is "valid" - whether it is recommended, good practice etc is another matter entirely. I'd point them to github, set up a git server (very easy to do) or an SVN server, personally. I'd also ask for their commit log.
不是源代码控制，也许只是源代码备份
Not Source Control, maybe just a Source Backup
我将 svn 存储库存储在 DropBox 文件夹中，这是一种在多台计算机上工作而无需设置适当的 SVN 服务器的快速而肮脏的方法。
仅只有当两个人不同时在不同的计算机上使用它时才有效（它会被损坏）
I store my svn repository in a DropBox folder, which is a quick and dirty way to work on multiple computers without setting up a proper SVN server.
This only works if two people don't use it on different computers at the same time (it will get corrupted)
不。免费的源代码管理托管已广泛使用 - dropbox 并不比 git 或 Mercurial 更快，尽管它更脏。
您不妨在本地使用 RCS，就像使用 dropbox 一样。
No. Free source control hosting is widely available - dropbox isn't quicker than git or mercurial, although it is dirtier.
You might as well use RCS locally as use dropbox.