软件开发术语的最佳词典是什么?

发布于 2024-08-21 14:18:42 字数 450 浏览 4 评论 0原文

在堆栈溢出上,我看到维基百科很多被引用。然而,我经常不确定它们是否是非常具体的软件开发相关概念的明确权威。例如,我最近查找了术语 Web 服务器/服务RPC/IPC ,我得到的回复经常参考维基百科(直接和间接)。

因此我的问题是:对于软件开发术语的定义,您最信任哪些来源?

On stack overflow, I see that there is referred to Wikipedia a lot. However, I'm often not sure whether they are the definite authority for very specific software development related concepts. For example, I have recently looked for definitions of the terms web server/service and RPC/IPC, and the responses I get very often refer to Wikipedia (directly and indirectly).

Hence my question: which sources do you trust the most for definitions of software development jargon?

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论(4

究竟谁懂我的在乎 2024-08-28 14:18:42

http://www.google.com

不,这不是开玩笑。

http://www.google.com

And no, this isn't being tongue-in-cheek.

已下线请稍等 2024-08-28 14:18:42

就我个人而言,我曾经信任维基百科,并且我仍然阅读它来了解该主题。但书籍绝对是更好的选择。因为它们不仅有“压缩”的解释,而且还提供了示例并给出了更广泛的描述。正如我大学的教授所说,不要相信维基百科,而是寻找授权来源。例如,您可以在《Building Web Services with Java - Making Sense of XML, SOAP, WSDL, UDDI - 2nd Edition 2005》一书中找到有关 Web 服务技术的大量信息。它包含您在 Wikipedia 甚至 Google 中找不到的信息(除非你发现这本书使用了它;))。
希望这有帮助。

Personally I used to trust Wikipedia, and I still read it to get an idea about the subject. But definitely books are better choice. Because they not only have a "compressed" explanation but also provide an examples and give broader description. As professors of my university say, don't trust wikipedia, search for an authorized source. For example a huge information about web service technology you can find in the book Building Web Services with Java - Making Sense of XML, SOAP, WSDL, UDDI - 2nd Edition 2005. It contains information you'll never find in Wikipedia or even in Google (Unless you'll find this book using it ;) ).
Hope this helps.

电影里的梦 2024-08-28 14:18:42

Google 和技术 &非技术性软件开发书籍。

Google and technical & non-technical software development books.

云裳 2024-08-28 14:18:42

故事文化”可能对您有用因为你想要字典以外的东西,IMO。您想要的是具有该主题的知识和智慧的东西,而不仅仅是这意味着什么。例如,有几篇关于技术债务的博客文章,我非常喜欢将其用作有关该主题的参考,其中一篇来自 Steve McConnell 和来自 马丁·福勒

虽然我通常建议查看该术语的来源,但对于一个术语被过度使用或过度使用而导致其意义不大的情况,有一些话要说。我可以说我相信一些人的博客可以对某个主题有一些了解,其中包括 JoelsJeffs,但不要忘记我们每个人都有大脑,我们不应该害怕使用它。

"A Story Culture" may be a useful read for you as you want something other than a dictionary, IMO. You want something with the knowledge and wisdom of the topic rather than simply what does this mean. For example, there are a couple of blog posts about Technical Debt that I really like to use for reference about the subject, one from Steve McConnell and one from Martin Fowler.

While I can generally suggest going to the source for the term, there is something to be said for a term getting overloaded or overused so that it can have little meaning. There are a few folks' blogs that I can say I trust to get some understanding on a subject including Joels and Jeffs, but don't forget that each of us has a brain and we shouldn't be afraid to use it.

~没有更多了~
我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
原文