每个业务对象都应该是一个服务吗?

发布于 2024-08-21 13:37:53 字数 137 浏览 2 评论 0原文

我知道当你将 Web 服务与直接代码进行比较时,性能可能是一个问题。但随着 SOA 的兴起,我不得不考虑是否应该计划将应用程序中的每个业务对象都变成 Web 服务(WCF 或 .asmx)。

.NET 4 中 WCF 的改进无疑让我重新审视。

I know performance can be an issue with web services when you compare them to direct code. But with SOA on the rise, I have to wonder if I should be planning to make every business object in my apps into a web service, either WCF or .asmx.

The improvements to WCF in .NET 4 are definitely making me give is a second look.

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论(4

旧伤还要旧人安 2024-08-28 13:37:54

SOA 是指独立系统与其他独立系统进行通信。如果您遇到一个系统需要了解另一个系统的操作或数据的场景,那么服务可能就是答案,但并非您创建的每个对象都不需要通过服务使用。所有其他人都是完全正确的。有道理吗?和简单吗?

SOA is about independent systems talking to other independent systems. If you have a scenario where one system needs to know about the actions or data of another system, a service might be the answer, but not every object you ever create will not need to be consumed via a service. And all the other guys are exactly correct. Does it make sense? and Is it simple?

維他命╮ 2024-08-28 13:37:53

无论“未来”、酷炫的新技术等等如何,有一个原则永远不会过时:简单。

我的一般方法是让事情尽可能简单。我们今天拥有的开发工具可以让您在需要时轻松地将普通业务对象“升级”为 Web 服务。

只是盒子里少了几根不需要的电线。加上免费的性能提升:)

Regardless of 'the future', cool new technologies and the like, one principle never goes out of date: Simplicity.

My general approach is to keep things as simple as possible. The dev tools we have today makes it delightfully easy to 'upgrade' a normal business object into a webservice when you need to.

Just a few less wires inside the box that are not needed. Plus a free performance boost :)

尐偏执 2024-08-28 13:37:53

无论教条如何,正确的答案都是由“这有意义吗?”的答案给出的。

将您的 Employee 业务对象作为服务提供是否有意义?也许是这样。将 WarehouseShelfLocationArchive 业务对象作为服务提供是否有意义?也许不是。如果不是,仅仅因为时尚就这样做是愚蠢的。

Regardless of dogma, the correct answer is given by the answer to "does it make sense?"

Does it make sense to make your Employee business object available as a service? Maybe so. Does it make sense to have your WarehouseShelfLocationArchive business object available as a service? Maybe not. If not, it's foolish to do so only because it's fashionable.

暖心男生 2024-08-28 13:37:53

@gabe 是对的,您需要确保使对象服务有意义。然而,我还发现,一旦你构建了一项服务,其他人就会使用它。我在我写的服务中一遍又一遍地看到这一点:“如果你构建它,他们就会来”。

@gabe is right that you need to make sure that making objects services makes sense. However, I've also found that once you build a service, others will consume it. I've seen this over and over again in the services I've written: "if you build it, they will come".

~没有更多了~
我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
原文