网页设计中的屏幕尺寸标准
设计网站时屏幕尺寸的标准是什么？还是800x600吗？
What is the standard for screen sizes when designing web sites? Is it still 800x600?
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
设计网站时屏幕尺寸的标准是什么？还是800x600吗？
What is the standard for screen sizes when designing web sites? Is it still 800x600?
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
接受 或继续使用网站，即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
发布评论
评论（5）
1024x768 是目前普遍定位的低端分辨率。通常活动区域宽度为950-960。
1024x768 is the lowend res generally targeted these days. usually with a live area of 950-960 wide.
我还选择宽度 960 和高度 600 左右。 Google 浏览器大小是一种非常简洁的方式，可以直观地显示您期望访问者看到的内容。
I also go with 960 for width and about 600 for height. Google Browser Size is a pretty neat way to visualize what you can expect your visitors to see.
标准是让你的CSS灵活（流动）而不是僵化（或保持特定的宽度），这样无论你的网站在什么尺寸的桌面上查看，都可以看到它的整体，而不会令人烦恼空间间隙。
960 像素似乎是当前宽度的流行。The standard is to make your CSS flexible (fluid) and not rigid (or kept to a specific width), so that it doesn't matter what size desktop your site is being viewed on, it can be seen in its totality, without annoying space gaps.
960 pixelsseems to be the current rage for width, though.随着笔记本电脑和液晶显示器的爆炸式增长，使用 1024 是安全的，并准备好在 1280-1440+ 上被大部分网络看到。固定宽度趋势atm是960像素网格。但我更喜欢流体布局。
With the laptop and LCD monitor explosion, its safe to go with 1024 and be prepared to be seen in 1280-1440+ by a good portion of the web. The fixed width trend atm is the 960 pixel grid. But I'm a bigger fan of fluid layouts.
没有一个标准，也从来没有一个标准。你必须牢记你的观众。您是否有人使用宽度非常窄但可能会缩放的 PDA 进行访问？您是否有人使用分辨率通常很小的上网本进行访问？他们新手是否在侧边栏上浪费了一半的屏幕宽度？您是否有人使用 30 英寸高分辨率显示器全屏浏览？
因此，您可以使用响应浏览器宽度的液体部分进行灵活的布局，并且在各种分辨率（包括所有您说“是”的分辨率）下看起来都可以接受（希望它们仍然可以用于这些范围之外的分辨率，即使不是很漂亮。）
就其价值而言，我的大多数主流（即不以移动设备为中心）网站或多或少仍然是-设计的宽度从 700 左右到 1900 左右。但您的用户可能会有所不同。
There is no one standard and there never has been. You have to bear your audience in mind. Do you have people accessing on a PDA with a very narrow but possibly zoomed width? Do you have people accessing on a netbook with a generally quite small resolution? Are they newbs wasting half their screen width on a sidebar? Do you have people with 30" high-res displays browsing full-screen?
So then you make a flexible layout with liquid parts that respond to browser width, and look acceptable across a range of resolutions which includes all those you said ‘yes’ to above. (And hopefully they'll still remain usable for resolutions outside those ranges, if not exactly pretty.)
For what it's worth, most of my mainstream (ie., not mobile-focused) sites remain more-or-less as-designed from widths from around 700 to around 1900. But your users may differ.