IronRuby System.DateTime NilClass

发布于 2024-08-21 00:55:00 字数 691 浏览 6 评论 0原文

为什么与 null 比较如此不稳定?

只是代码。

IronRuby 0.9.4.0 on .NET 2.0.50727.4927
Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.

>>> require 'System'
=> true
>>> i = System::Int32.MinValue
=> -2147483648
>>> i==nil
=> false
>>> d = System::DateTime.Now
=> 11.02.2010 14:15:02
>>> d==nil
(ir):1: can't convert NilClass into System::DateTime (TypeError)
>>> 

在 9.1 中,此代码按预期工作。

编辑:

解决方法:

>>> i.nil?
=> false
>>> d.nil?
=> false
>>> nil
=> nil
>>> nil.nil?
=> true
>>>

Why comparing to null is so unstable?

Just code.

IronRuby 0.9.4.0 on .NET 2.0.50727.4927
Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.

>>> require 'System'
=> true
>>> i = System::Int32.MinValue
=> -2147483648
>>> i==nil
=> false
>>> d = System::DateTime.Now
=> 11.02.2010 14:15:02
>>> d==nil
(ir):1: can't convert NilClass into System::DateTime (TypeError)
>>> 

In 9.1 this code works as expected.

EDIT:

workaround:

>>> i.nil?
=> false
>>> d.nil?
=> false
>>> nil
=> nil
>>> nil.nil?
=> true
>>>

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论(1

陪你到最终 2024-08-28 00:55:00

据我所知,不一致是因为 System.DateTime 定义了它自己的 == 方法,而 System.Int32 没有。
此外,System.Int32 是一个“特殊”类,IronRuby 将其直接映射到 Fixnum,因此当您调用 System.Int32 == x 时>,您实际上是在调用内置的 Fixnum#== 方法。

考虑到这一点,会发生以下情况:

使用 Int32 时,映射到 Fixnum

x = System::Int32.MinValue # => -2147483648
x.class # => Fixnum
x == nil # => Fixnum == nil

使用 Int16 时,它不映射到任何内容,并且不映射重载 ==

x = System::Int16.MinValue # => -32768 (Int16)
x.class # => System::Int16
x == nil # => Object == nil

DateTime 不映射,但确实重载 ==

x = System::DateTime.Now # => 1/03/2010 9:00:47 a.m.
x.class # => System::DateTime
x == nil # System::DateTime == nil

系统: :DateTime 重载 == 方法仅接受其他 System::DateTime 结构。
然后,IronRuby 尝试将 nil 转换为这些结构之一,以便它可以调用该方法,然后该方法会失败并出现您看到的错误。

这看起来不一致吗?是的。
难道真的不一致吗?我认为不。好吧,这并不比定义自己的 == 方法的任何其他 CLR 类型更加不一致。对我来说,仅使用 System::DateTime 的特殊情况是没有意义的,

但总的来说,这并不重要。在 ruby​​ 中检查 null 的“正确”方法是调用 .nil?,这适用于 DateTime 或任何其他类/结构

As far as I can tell, the inconsistency is because System.DateTime defines it's own == method, and System.Int32 does not.
Furthermore, System.Int32 is a "special" class in that IronRuby maps it directly to Fixnum, so when you call System.Int32 == x, you're actually calling the built in Fixnum#== method.

With that in mind, here's what happens:

With Int32, which maps to Fixnum

x = System::Int32.MinValue # => -2147483648
x.class # => Fixnum
x == nil # => Fixnum == nil

With Int16 which doesn't map to anything, and does not overload ==

x = System::Int16.MinValue # => -32768 (Int16)
x.class # => System::Int16
x == nil # => Object == nil

With DateTime which doesn't map, but does overload ==

x = System::DateTime.Now # => 1/03/2010 9:00:47 a.m.
x.class # => System::DateTime
x == nil # System::DateTime == nil

The System::DateTime overloaded == method only accepts other System::DateTime structures.
IronRuby then tries to convert nil to one of these structures so it can call the method, which then fails with the error you see.

Does this appear inconsistent? Yes.
Is it actually inconsistent? I'd argue no. Well, no more inconsistent than any other CLR type that defines it's own == method. To me it makes no sense to just have a special case for System::DateTime

In general though, it doesn't matter. The "correct" way to check for null in ruby is to call .nil?, and this works well with DateTime or any other class/struct

~没有更多了~
我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
原文