首先，我对这种类型的接口几乎一无所知，这是我第一次尝试。我希望使用一种统计/模拟软件 Maple 或 Mathematica 或 R 进行计算，并使用 C#/Java 来处理其他领域，如持久性和数据收集等。
您能否告诉我，这些平台 (.Net/Java) 中的哪一个在以下方面对本次练习更友好： 将
- 数据准备为统计软件可用的格式所需的
- 工作量 内存要求和之间通信所需的时间方面的 性能两个程序。
我知道单一平台可能并不适合所有这些平台，一个平台可能对枫树来说非常好，但对 R 来说太糟糕了。我正在寻找的是一个很好的组合。
为什么我不固定使用 Maple/Mathematica/R 之一？嗯，它们都对我来说是可用的，而且我想要计算的内容非常常见，并且在所有这些中也可用。
因此，归根结底在于哪一个易于连接。
干杯
First, I know almost nothing about the interfacing of this type and this is the first time, I'm trying it out. I am looking to use one of the Statistics/Simulation software either Maple or Mathematica or R for calculations and use C#/Java to handle other areas like persistence and data collection and so on.
Can you tell me which one of these platforms (.Net/Java) is more friendly for this exercise in terms of:
- Effort required to prepare the data to the format usable by statistics software
- Performance in terms of memory requirement and time required for communication between two programs.
I understand that a single platform may not be good for all of them and one may be very good for say maple but too bad for R. What I'm looking for is a good combination.
And why I'm not fixed on one of Maple/Mathematica/R? Well, they all are available to me and what I'm trying to calculate is pretty much common and also available in all of them.
So it has come down to which one is easy for interfacing.
Cheers
发布评论
评论（4）
这确实没有概述问题。如果您要进行一些复杂的解析，答案可能更多地围绕可用的库。在什么都不知道的情况下，我会猜测Java。如果不需要特殊的库，它们可能是相同的。
两者之间的内存是相似的，并且主要是您的应用程序和您使用的库的各个方面的一个因素。对于 cpu 性能，在所有其他方面都相同的情况下，我通常发现 CLR 的原始性能比 JVM 更好。但是，请小心该声明。根据您使用的代码和库，您可能会得到截然不同的结果。
另一项考虑因素取决于您问题的性质。如果您发现有一些密集处理可以卸载到本机代码中，您会发现从 CLR 访问本机代码比从 JVM 访问本机代码要容易得多、速度更快。
This really doesn't outline the problem. If you are going to be doing some complicated parsing, the answer may be more around the available libraries. Without knowing anything, I would guess Java. If no special libraries are required, they are probably equal.
Memory between the two is similar and is mostly going to be a factor of aspects of your application and libraries you use. For cpu performance, all other aspects equal, I usually find that the CLR has better raw performance than the JVM. However, be careful with that statement. Depending on what code and libraries you are using, you could get wildly different results.
One other consideration depending on the nature of your problem. If you find you have some intensive processing that could be offloaded into native code, you will find that it is much easier, and faster, to access native code from the CLR than from the JVM.
请查看此处，了解有关您可能想要使用哪种语言的一些深入见解。 Java 可能会得到最好的支持（尽管我确实不想这么说）
Look here for some good insights on which language you might want to use. Java is probably going to have the best support (though I do hate to say that)
有两个问题。
因此，弄清楚您将使用什么包以及它可以做什么。
There are two issues.
So, figure out what package you will use, and what it can do.
就语言而言，您不太可能看到真正的差异。也许 C# 因为它更新而更好。然而，Java 的存在时间更长，并且拥有更多的开源库。这意味着您更有可能在 Java 中找到适合您的 X 或 Y 功能的库。
这里只是一些可用的开源 Java 库。 http://java-sources.org/1
Google 可以帮助您找到更多图书馆。
I terms of the language, you are unlikely to see a real difference. Perhaps C# is nicer as its newer. However, Java had been around longer and has far more open source libraries. This means you are more likely to find a library which does X or Y to suit you in Java.
Here is a just a few of the open source Java libraries available. http://java-sources.org/1
Google can help you find many more libraries.