我们可以在任何设计中使用 CSS 网格框架吗？
使用基于网格的方法有什么缺点？一切都按比例进行？
这一切是否都会造成一些限制？我不是在谈论非语义类、不需要的 CSS 代码、表感结构。
我的问题是关于固定比例的工作。在基于网格的系统中，一切都按比例增加和减少？
我认为如果我们同时进行 PSD 设计和 XHTML css 编码，我们只能使用基于网格的框架？
What are cons to use Grid based approach? Where everything is in proportions?
Does it all make some restrictness? I'm not talking about non-sematic classes, unneeded css code, table- feel structure.
My question is about to work with fix proportions. in grid based system everything increase and decrease in proportions?
I think we can only use grid based framework if we are doing both thing PSD design and XHTML css coding?
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（2）
如果您不设计网站，我强烈建议不要使用网格或任何其他会改变设计（按比例或以其他方式）的工具。将设计留给设计师，然后负责开发，努力让您的最终设计尽可能接近设计师完成的模型。
诺尔斯比我将设计交给开发人员更让我恼火，他因为一些他认为相关的改进而“调整”了它。
如果您的设计师不使用网格，请与他讨论。如果他更喜欢在没有网格的情况下继续，那么就不要在他的设计中强制使用网格。
If you are not designing the site, I highly suggest not using a grid or any other tools that would alter the design (proportionately or otherwise). Leave the design to the designer, and handle development, trying to get your finished design as close as possible to the finished mockup from the designer.
Nother irritates me more than when I have handed off a design to a developer, and he "adjusts" it because of some improvement he thought relevant.
If your designer doesn't use a grid, talk to him about it. If he prefers to continue without a grid, then don't force a grid on his design.
网格不会按比例增加/减少事物。它们仅允许您以良好且有序的方式布局事物。我想不出基于网格的 CSS 框架有什么缺点。也许它们对于某些项目来说有点矫枉过正，但除此之外，它们非常棒，应该受到资深设计师的青睐。
Grids don't increase/decrease things proportionally. They merely allow you to layout things in a nice and orderly fashion. I can't think of any cons to grid-based CSS frameworks. Perhaps they are overkill for some projects, but other than that they are terrific and should be favored by veteran designers.