错误的 MySQL 更新查询后恢复?
我在表中进行了错误的更新查询。
我忘记在 WHERE
子句中创建 id 字段。
这样就更新了我的所有行。
如何恢复呢?
我没有备份....
I made a wrong update query in my table.
I forgot to make an id field in the WHERE
clause.
So that updated all my rows.
How to recover that?
I didn't have a backup....
如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱,如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论,将不能在第一时间通知您!
发布评论
评论(4)
这里有两个教训值得学习:
了解事务(自动提交、显式提交和事务提交)对数据库的隐式)处理可以使您不必从备份中恢复数据。
事务控制数据操作语句以确保它们是原子的。 “原子”意味着事务要么发生,要么不发生。向数据库发出事务完成信号的唯一方法是使用
COMMIT
或ROLLBACK
语句(根据 ANSI-92,遗憾的是,该语句不包含用于创建/开始交易,因此它是特定于供应商的)。COMMIT
应用事务中所做的更改(如果有)。ROLLBACK
忽略事务中发生的任何操作 - 当 UPDATE/DELETE 语句执行意外操作时非常理想。通常,各个 DML(插入、更新、删除)语句在自动提交事务中执行 - 一旦语句成功完成,它们就会被提交。这意味着在像您这样的情况下,没有机会将数据库回滚到语句运行之前的状态。当出现问题时,唯一可用的恢复选项是从备份重建数据(前提是存在备份)。在 MySQL 中,自动提交开启< /em> InnoDB 默认情况下 - MyISAM 不支持事务。可以通过以下方式禁用它:
显式事务是指语句包含在显式定义的事务代码块中 - 对于 MySQL,即
开始事务
。它还需要在事务结束时显式创建COMMIT
或ROLLBACK
语句。嵌套事务超出了本主题的范围。隐式交易与显式交易略有不同。隐式事务不需要显式定义事务。但是,与显式事务一样,它们需要提供
COMMIT
或ROLLBACK
语句。结论
显式事务是最理想的解决方案 - 它们需要一个语句,
COMMIT
或ROLLBACK
来完成事务,并且清楚地说明正在发生的情况供其他人阅读成为一种需要。如果以交互方式使用数据库,则隐式事务是可以的,但是只有在测试和测试结果后才应指定 COMMIT 语句。彻底确定为有效。这意味着您应该使用:
...并且仅在结果正确时才使用
COMMIT;
。也就是说,UPDATE 和 DELETE 语句通常只返回受影响的行数,而不返回具体的详细信息。将此类语句转换为 SELECT 语句 &在尝试 UPDATE/DELETE 语句之前检查结果以确保正确性。
附录
DDL(数据定义语言)语句会自动提交 - 它们不需要 COMMIT 语句。 IE:表、索引、存储过程、数据库和视图创建或更改语句。
There are two lessons to be learned here:
ROLLBACK
if things don't go as plannedBeing aware of the transaction (autocommit, explicit and implicit) handling for your database can save you from having to restore data from a backup.
Transactions control data manipulation statement(s) to ensure they are atomic. Being "atomic" means the transaction either occurs, or it does not. The only way to signal the completion of the transaction to database is by using either a
COMMIT
orROLLBACK
statement (per ANSI-92, which sadly did not include syntax for creating/beginning a transaction so it is vendor specific).COMMIT
applies the changes (if any) made within the transaction.ROLLBACK
disregards whatever actions took place within the transaction - highly desirable when an UPDATE/DELETE statement does something unintended.Typically individual DML (Insert, Update, Delete) statements are performed in an autocommit transaction - they are committed as soon as the statement successfully completes. Which means there's no opportunity to roll back the database to the state prior to the statement having been run in cases like yours. When something goes wrong, the only restoration option available is to reconstruct the data from a backup (providing one exists). In MySQL, autocommit is on by default for InnoDB - MyISAM doesn't support transactions. It can be disabled by using:
An explicit transaction is when statement(s) are wrapped within an explicitly defined transaction code block - for MySQL, that's
START TRANSACTION
. It also requires an explicitly madeCOMMIT
orROLLBACK
statement at the end of the transaction. Nested transactions is beyond the scope of this topic.Implicit transactions are slightly different from explicit ones. Implicit transactions do not require explicity defining a transaction. However, like explicit transactions they require a
COMMIT
orROLLBACK
statement to be supplied.Conclusion
Explicit transactions are the most ideal solution - they require a statement,
COMMIT
orROLLBACK
, to finalize the transaction, and what is happening is clearly stated for others to read should there be a need. Implicit transactions are OK if working with the database interactively, butCOMMIT
statements should only be specified once results have been tested & thoroughly determined to be valid.That means you should use:
...and only use
COMMIT;
when the results are correct.That said, UPDATE and DELETE statements typically only return the number of rows affected, not specific details. Convert such statements into SELECT statements & review the results to ensure correctness prior to attempting the UPDATE/DELETE statement.
Addendum
DDL (Data Definition Language) statements are automatically committed - they do not require a COMMIT statement. IE: Table, index, stored procedure, database, and view creation or alteration statements.
抱歉,伙计,但是恢复被覆盖的 MySQL 数据库的机会通常接近于零。与删除文件不同,覆盖记录在大多数情况下实际上是物理覆盖现有数据。
为了做好准备,如果这里出现任何问题,您应该停止 MySQL 服务器,并复制包含数据库的物理目录,这样就不会进一步覆盖任何内容:只需将数据文件夹复制+粘贴到其他位置就可以了。
但不要抱太大希望——我认为实际上没有什么可以做的。
您可能希望为将来设置频繁的数据库备份。周围有很多解决方案; MySQL 自己的 mysqldump。
Sorry man, but the chances of restoring an overwritten MySQL database are usually close to zero. Different from deleting a file, overwriting a record actually and physically overwrites the existing data in most cases.
To be prepared if anything comes up here, you should stop your MySQL server, and make a copy of the physical directory containing the database so nothing can get overwritten further: A simple copy+paste of the data folder to a different location should do.
But don't get your hopes up - I think there's nothing that can be done really.
You may want to set up a frequent database backup for the future. There are many solutions around; one of the simplest, most reliable and easiest to automate (using
at
orcron
in Linux, or the task scheduler in Windows) is MySQL's own mysqldump.很遗憾地说,如果没有备份,就无法恢复旧的字段值。
不要向使者开枪……
Sorry to say that, but there is no way to restore the old field values without a backup.
Don't shoot the messenger...
您启用了二进制日志吗?您可以通过访问 binlog 来恢复。
Do you have binlogs enabled? You can recover by accessing the binlogs.