我对两个 pdf 文件进行了比较（您必须阅读当前的文件才能理解这些文件的含义）：
更改：
0 - 全文：删除对特定产品的引用并替换为“iPhone OS”
1 - 全文：引用包括联邦政府添加到“您的公司、组织...”类型的短语。
2 - 第 3.1.17 和 3.1.18 条是“内容和材料”部分的新增内容
3 - 第 3.3.24 条是新增内容
4 - 第 15.11 条 - 针对 Apple 与 Apple 之间的争议进行的更改教育机构
5 - 增加了附件 A 第 9 条。
希望有帮助。（警告：我不是律师，所以谁知道从法律角度来看发生了什么变化）。
I did an compare of the two pdf files (you'll have to read the current one to understand what these mean):
changes:
0 - throughout: remove references to specific products and replace with "iPhone OS"
1 - throughout: references to include the federal government added to "your company, organization..." type phrases.
2 - clauses 3.1.17 and 3.1.18 are new to "Content and Materials" section
3 - clause 3.3.24 is new
4 - clause 15.11 - changes for disputes between apple & education institutions
5 - Exhibit A, clause 9 was added.
hope that helps.(caveat: I'm no lawyer, so who knows what changed from a legal standpoint).
为什么不直接读新的呢？只需几分钟。
-t
Why not just read the new one. It only takes a few minutes.
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
暂无简介
文章 0 评论 0
接受
发布评论
评论（2）
我对两个 pdf 文件进行了比较（您必须阅读当前的文件才能理解这些文件的含义）：
更改：
0 - 全文：删除对特定产品的引用并替换为“iPhone OS”
1 - 全文：引用包括联邦政府添加到“您的公司、组织...”类型的短语。
2 - 第 3.1.17 和 3.1.18 条是“内容和材料”部分的新增内容
3 - 第 3.3.24 条是新增内容
4 - 第 15.11 条 - 针对 Apple 与 Apple 之间的争议进行的更改教育机构
5 - 增加了附件 A 第 9 条。
希望有帮助。
（警告：我不是律师，所以谁知道从法律角度来看发生了什么变化）。
I did an compare of the two pdf files (you'll have to read the current one to understand what these mean):
changes:
0 - throughout: remove references to specific products and replace with "iPhone OS"
1 - throughout: references to include the federal government added to "your company, organization..." type phrases.
2 - clauses 3.1.17 and 3.1.18 are new to "Content and Materials" section
3 - clause 3.3.24 is new
4 - clause 15.11 - changes for disputes between apple & education institutions
5 - Exhibit A, clause 9 was added.
hope that helps.
(caveat: I'm no lawyer, so who knows what changed from a legal standpoint).
为什么不直接读新的呢？只需几分钟。
-t
Why not just read the new one. It only takes a few minutes.
-t