传递给 C# 中的属性时对象变为 null
我有一个抽象类 Employee 和其他 2 个扩展它的类(开发人员和经理)。我的问题是,当我创建一个 Manager
Employee man = new Manager(1234567, 30, "Bob", "Pie")
并尝试将其设置在新开发人员的 Manager 字段中时,
Employee codemonkey = new Developer(1234568, 20, "Code", "Monkey", (Manager)man)
我不断收到 ArgumentException ,表明我的 Manager 为空。我做了一些检查,当我尝试使用构造函数中的 Manager 属性设置它时,它不知何故变成了空。任何关于我为什么会收到此错误的建议将不胜感激。蒂亚!
每个类的代码如下:
//Employee Class
public abstract class Employee
{
string firstName, lastName;
int id, yearsEmployed;
//Names must be non-empty
public string FirstName
{
get { return firstName; }
set
{
if (!value.Equals(""))
{
firstName = value;
}
else
throw new ArgumentException("name cannot be empty");
}
}
public string LastName
{
get { return lastName; }
set
{
if (!value.Equals(""))
{
lastName = value;
}
else
throw new ArgumentException("name cannot be empty");
}
}
// IDs must be strings consisting of exactly seven digits.
public int ID
{
get { return id; }
set
{
if (value.ToString().Length == 7)
{
id = value;
}
else
throw new ArgumentException("ID must consist of 7 digits");
}
}
// Years employed must always be non-negative.
public int YearsEmployed
{
get { return yearsEmployed; }
set
{
if (value >= 0)
{
yearsEmployed = value;
}
else
throw new ArgumentException("Year employed must be non-negative");
}
}
//Constructor
public Employee(int id, int yearsEmployed,
string firstName, string lastName)
{
this.FirstName = firstName;
this.LastName = lastName;
this.ID = id;
this.YearsEmployed = yearsEmployed;
}
public abstract int GetLevel { get; }
public abstract string GetTitle { get; }
public string GetFullTitle { get { return GetTitle + " " + GetLevel; } }
}
//Developer Class:
public class Developer : Employee
{
Manager manager;
//Manager cannot be null
public Manager Manager
{
get { return manager; }
set
{
if (manager != null)
{
manager = value;
}
else
throw new ArgumentException("Manager cannot be null");
}
}
//Constructor
public Developer(int id, int yearsEmployed, string firstName,
string lastName, Manager manager)
: base(id, yearsEmployed, firstName, lastName)
{
Console.WriteLine("manager is not null:" + manager != null); //True here
this.Manager = manager; // manager is null here
}
public override int GetLevel
{
get { return (this.YearsEmployed + 1) / 3; }
}
public override string GetTitle
{
get { return "Developer"; }
}
}
//Manager Class
public class Manager : Employee
{
//Constructor
public Manager(int id, int yearsEmployed,
string firstName, string lastName)
: base(id, yearsEmployed, firstName, lastName) { }
public override int GetLevel
{
get { return (YearsEmployed + 1) / 2; }
}
public override string GetTitle
{
get { return "Manager"; }
}
}
I have an abstract class Employee and 2 other classes that extend it (Developer and Manager). My problem is that when I whenever I create a Manager
Employee man = new Manager(1234567, 30, "Bob", "Pie")
and try to set it in the Manager field of a new Developer,
Employee codemonkey = new Developer(1234568, 20, "Code", "Monkey", (Manager)man)
I keep getting the ArgumentException that my Manager is null. I did some checks and it somehow becomes null when I try to set it with the Manager property in the constructor. Any advice as to why I'm getting this error would be greatly appreciated. TIA!
The code for each is below:
//Employee Class
public abstract class Employee
{
string firstName, lastName;
int id, yearsEmployed;
//Names must be non-empty
public string FirstName
{
get { return firstName; }
set
{
if (!value.Equals(""))
{
firstName = value;
}
else
throw new ArgumentException("name cannot be empty");
}
}
public string LastName
{
get { return lastName; }
set
{
if (!value.Equals(""))
{
lastName = value;
}
else
throw new ArgumentException("name cannot be empty");
}
}
// IDs must be strings consisting of exactly seven digits.
public int ID
{
get { return id; }
set
{
if (value.ToString().Length == 7)
{
id = value;
}
else
throw new ArgumentException("ID must consist of 7 digits");
}
}
// Years employed must always be non-negative.
public int YearsEmployed
{
get { return yearsEmployed; }
set
{
if (value >= 0)
{
yearsEmployed = value;
}
else
throw new ArgumentException("Year employed must be non-negative");
}
}
//Constructor
public Employee(int id, int yearsEmployed,
string firstName, string lastName)
{
this.FirstName = firstName;
this.LastName = lastName;
this.ID = id;
this.YearsEmployed = yearsEmployed;
}
public abstract int GetLevel { get; }
public abstract string GetTitle { get; }
public string GetFullTitle { get { return GetTitle + " " + GetLevel; } }
}
//Developer class:
public class Developer : Employee
{
Manager manager;
//Manager cannot be null
public Manager Manager
{
get { return manager; }
set
{
if (manager != null)
{
manager = value;
}
else
throw new ArgumentException("Manager cannot be null");
}
}
//Constructor
public Developer(int id, int yearsEmployed, string firstName,
string lastName, Manager manager)
: base(id, yearsEmployed, firstName, lastName)
{
Console.WriteLine("manager is not null:" + manager != null); //True here
this.Manager = manager; // manager is null here
}
public override int GetLevel
{
get { return (this.YearsEmployed + 1) / 3; }
}
public override string GetTitle
{
get { return "Developer"; }
}
}
//Manager Class
public class Manager : Employee
{
//Constructor
public Manager(int id, int yearsEmployed,
string firstName, string lastName)
: base(id, yearsEmployed, firstName, lastName) { }
public override int GetLevel
{
get { return (YearsEmployed + 1) / 2; }
}
public override string GetTitle
{
get { return "Manager"; }
}
}
如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱,如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论,将不能在第一时间通知您!
发布评论
评论(4)
你不想说:
而不是
Manager 字段将被初始化为 null。 value 关键字表示传递给属性的数据。
Don't you want to say:
instead of
The manager field will be initialized to null. The value keyword represents the data that is being passed to the property.
更改
为
Change
To
您从未设置字段管理器的值,仅设置属性管理器的值,因此在属性中,当您检查管理器的值时,它为空,因为它尚未设置。您可以在构造函数中设置字段管理器:
并检查属性中的值
(无论如何您都需要执行此操作,否则您赋予属性的值永远不会被使用并且永远不会更新)
取决于您是否想要管理器能够被改变。
you are never setting the value of the field manager, only the property Manager, so in the property when you check the value of manager it is null as it has not been set. you could set the field manager in the constructor:
and check for the value in the property
(you need to do this anyway, otherwise the value you give to the property is never used and will never be updated)
depending on if you want the Manager to be able to be changed.
在 Developer.Manager 的 setter 中更改
为
In Developer.Manager's setter change
to