您能否推荐一个与 IBM 的 DITA 兼容的组件 CMS
我正在寻找一个在保留 DITA (ditamaps) 中创建的文档层次结构/结构方面与 IBM 的 DITA 兼容的组件 CMS 解决方案。
我不一定在寻找开源解决方案。
其他要求是：
- 文件迁移
- XML 支持（摄取、编辑、导出）
- PDF 支持（发布）
- 工作流程管理
- 本地化支持（跨区域管理版本）
- 输出标记
I am looking for a Component CMS solution that is compatible with IBM's DITA in terms of preserving the document hierarchy/structure created in DITA (ditamaps).
I am not necessarily looking for an open source solution.
Other requirements would be:
- file migration
- XML support (ingestion, editing, export)
- PDF support (publishing)
- Workflow management
- Localization support (managing versions across locales)
- Output tagging
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（5）
当您考虑 CCMS 时，请务必考虑以下因素：
DITA 的优点之一在于，如果您遵循标准并且不使用专有机制，您可以轻松地与业务合作伙伴交换内容、转移到另一个 CCMS（如果需要）等等。
较旧的 CCMS 使用专有机制来处理某些事情。这是完全可以理解的，因为它们是在 DITA 成为标准之前开发的，因此遗留客户必须支持其实现。
As you are looking at CCMS, be sure that you consider the following factors:
Part of the beauty of DITA is that if you follow the standard and do not use proprietary mechanisms, you easily can exchange content with business partners, move to another CCMS, if you needed, and so forth.
Older CCMS use proprietary mechanisms for some things. It's entirely understandable, since they were developed before DITA was a standard, and so have legacy customers with implementations that they must support.
根据像这样的论坛上的问题选择像组件 CMS 这样的东西有点危险（非常危险），但只要你问，你就可以看看这样的东西：SDL Trisoft、IXIASOFT DITA CMS、Vasont、 XDocs 或 DITA Exchange 以了解现有内容。 CCMS 系统在价格和功能上彼此差异很大，因此如下：
都会极大地影响决策过程。我们倾向于在提出可靠的建议之前花时间与客户交谈，因此这只是帮助您开始研究的东西。
PS - 您可能知道 Arbortext 根本不是组件 CMS，它是一个编辑器。
It's a bit dangerous (a lot dangerous) to be choosing something like a Component CMS based on questions on a forum like this, but as long as you're asking you could look at things like: SDL Trisoft, IXIASOFT DITA CMS, Vasont, XDocs, or DITA Exchange to get an idea of what is out there. CCMS systems are vastly different from each other both in price and functionality, so things like:
will all greatly affect the decision making process. We tend to spend time with a client before making solid recommendations so this is simply something to get you started in your research.
PS - As you may know Arbortext is not a Component CMS at all, it's an editor.
抱歉，从问题中不明白以下内容。
如果它是 (DITA) XML（或可以迁移到 XML），则以下过程可能是一个解决方案：
另请参阅 用于格式化 XML DocBook 的推荐工具链是什么？ 因为这些相同的建议可用于 DITA 工具链。
Sorry for not understanding the following thing, from the question.
If it comes as (DITA) XML (or can be migrated to XML), the following procedure might be a solution:
See also the What is the recommended tool chain for formatting XML DocBook? as these same suggestions can be used for a DITA tool chain.
IBM 在 Arbortext 上构建了 DITA。 Arbortext 是唯一一家成为 OASIS DITA 技术委员会特许成员的供应商，并且他们将作为 PTC 继续开展这项活动。 （Arbortext 于 2005 年被 PTC 收购）。
Arbortext 还支持 DocBook（自构思以来）、S1000D 和自定义文档类型，无需自定义应用程序。
很高兴在线下更多地谈论这个问题。
IBM built DITA on Arbortext. Arbortext was the only vendor to be a charter member of the OASIS DITA Technical Committee and they continue that activity as PTC. (Arbortext was acquired by PTC in 2005).
Arbortext also supports DocBook (since conception), S1000D, and custom doctypes with no customization of the application required.
Happy to talk more about this offline.
如果您仍在寻找选项，您应该查看 easyDITA (http://easydita.com)
If you are still looking for options you should check out easyDITA (http://easydita.com)