托管网站图像：Flickr PRO、Amazon S3 还是...？
我想节省网站每月的一些带宽分配，并且想知道是否可以使用 Flickr PRO 或者我应该依赖 Amazon S3 作为我的网站图像的托管服务。 （我的 Web 应用程序允许用户上传自己的图片，目前它管理着大约 40GB 的数据）
我从未使用过 Amazon 的服务，我喜欢使用 Flickr REST Api 从我的 webApp 动态上传图像的想法。
我也喜欢这样的想法：在 Flickr 上拥有几乎无限的空间来存储图像，每年只需 25 美元，但我不确定是否可以在我的网站上使用他们的服务。
我认为，如果我使用 Flickr 服务存储图像（由我网站的用户上传）且不仅仅用于“个人使用”，我的帐户可能会被禁止。
您的体验如何？您是否会建议使用 Amazon S3 以外的其他服务，或者这是目前唯一可用的选择？
谢谢
编辑：Flickr 明确表示“请勿将 Flickr 用于商业目的 '，您可以随时联系他们要求评估您的请求，但在我看来，我无法使用他们的服务来实现我想要的。 S3 看起来是正确的选择...
尽管粗略估计我每个月要花的钱仍然令人恐惧
5000 visit/day
* 400 img/user (avg 50kB/image)
* 30 days
= ~3TB of traffic
* 0.15$/GB (Amazon S3)
= 429$/month
有没有更便宜的地方来托管我的图像？
I'd like to save some of my site monthly bandwidth allocation and I'm wondering if I can use Flickr PRO or I should rely on Amazon S3 as an hosting service for my web site images. (My Web Application allows users to upload their own pictures and at the moment it's managing around 40GB of data)
I've never used Amazon's services and I like the idea of using Flickr REST Api do dynamically upload images from my webApp.
I like also the idea of having virtually unlimited space to store images on Flickr for only 25$/year but I'm not sure if I can use their service on my web site.
I think that my account can be banned if I use Flickr services to store images (uploaded by users of my website) that are not only for 'personal use'.
What's your experience and would you suggest other services rather than Amazon's S3 or is this the only available option at the moment?
Thanks
edit: Flickr explicitly says 'Don’t use Flickr for commercial purpose', you could always contact them to ask to evaluate your request but it sounds to me like I can't use their services to achieve what I want. S3 looks like the way to go then...
Even though a rough estimate of what I'm going to spend every month is still scaring
5000 visit/day
* 400 img/user (avg 50kB/image)
* 30 days
= ~3TB of traffic
* 0.15$/GB (Amazon S3)
= 429$/month
is there any cheaper place to host my images?
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（2）
每个用户 400 张图片似乎很高？这个数字是来自实际统计吗？
Amazon S3 很棒而且很有效！
一个可能更便宜的选择是谷歌。 Google 文档现在支持所有文件类型，因此您可以将图像加载到 Google 文档文件夹，并共享该文件夹以供公众访问。 URL有点长，例如
http://lh6.ggpht.com/VMLEHAa3 kSHEoRr7AchhQ6HEzHVTn1b7Mf-whpxmPlpdrRfPW216UhYdQy3pzIe4f8Q7PKXN79AD4eRqu1obC7I
添加=s 参数来缩放图像，酷！例如200像素宽
http://lh6.ggpht.com/VM LEHAa3kSHEoRr7AchhQ6HEzHVTn1b7Mf-whpxmPlpdrRfPW216UhYdQy3pzIe4f8Q7PKXN79AD4eRqu1obC7I=s200
Google 仅收取 20GB 每年 5 美元的费用。有一个完整的 API 用于上传文档等
400 images per user seems high? Is that figure from actual stats?
Amazon S3 is great and it just works!
A possible cheaper option is Google. Google docs now supports all file types, so you can load the images up to a Google docs folder, and share the folder for public access. The URL's are kind of long e.g.
http://lh6.ggpht.com/VMLEHAa3kSHEoRr7AchhQ6HEzHVTn1b7Mf-whpxmPlpdrRfPW216UhYdQy3pzIe4f8Q7PKXN79AD4eRqu1obC7I
Add the =s paramter to scale the image, cool! e.g. for 200 pixels wide
http://lh6.ggpht.com/VMLEHAa3kSHEoRr7AchhQ6HEzHVTn1b7Mf-whpxmPlpdrRfPW216UhYdQy3pzIe4f8Q7PKXN79AD4eRqu1obC7I=s200
Google only charge USD5/year for 20GB. There is a full API for uploading docs etc
我喜欢亚马逊S3。有很多很棒的代码库 (LitS3) 和浏览器插件 (S3Fox）并上传小部件 (Flajaxian ）这使得它非常易于使用。
而且您只需为您使用的内容付费。我经常使用它，并且只经历过一次停机。
Nivanix 是 s3 的竞争对手。我没有使用过它们，但它们有更多的功能（图像调整大小）等。
编辑：关于 Nivanix 的链接现在已经死了（2015/07/21），因为 Nivanix 已经死了。
I love amazon S3. There are so many great code libraries (LitS3) and browser plugins (S3Fox) and upload widgets (Flajaxian) that make it really easy to use.
And you only pay for what you use. I use it a lot and have only ever experienced down time on one occasion.
Nivanix is an s3 competitor. I haven't used them, but they have a bit more functionality (image resizing) etc.
Edit:The link about Nivanix is dead now(2015/07/21), because Nivanix was dead.