SEO 就是关于目标关键词、如何布局网站、写作时要遵循的一些基本规则等等。最后，来自其他网站的高质量入站链接对于良好排名来说是最重要的。
网站验证被高估了。这本意是好的，但对于 SEO 来说却被高估了。您可能有视力障碍的受众或您必须验证的法规，但这对于入站链接没有多大作用。无论如何，我编写的大多数 HTML 都会进行验证，但我不会竭尽全力使其如此。
几乎每个浏览器都有一个“怪异”模式来处理所有旧的 html 代码。搜索引擎可以很好地理解 HTML 最基本的形式。
如果您为搜索引擎优化付费，您需要更好地定位关键字之类的方法。您可能会发现 SEO 快速入门值得一看，它是免费下载的（谷歌搜索），并且概述了良好的 SEO 过程是什么样的。
SEO is all about which keywords to target, how to layout a website, some basic rules to follow when writing, and that sort of thing. In the end quality inbound links from other web sites is what matters most for a good rank.
Website validation is overrated. It's well meaning, but overrated for SEO. You may have an audience that is visually impaired or regulations that you must validate, but this doesn't do much of anything for inbound links. Most HTML I write validates anyway, but I don't go out of my way to make it so.
Pretty much every browser has a "quirks" mode to deal with all the old html code out there. The most basic form of HTML is well understood by search engines.
If you're paying for SEO you want ways to better target keywords and that sort of thing. You may find SEO Fast Start worth a look, it's a free download (google it) and will give an overview of what a good SEO process looks like.
根据我阅读的文章，搜索引擎将无法按预期读取内容，并将被解释为标签的一部分，因此被忽略。这显然是一件非常糟糕的事情。因此，考虑到这一点，可以通过验证 html 来修复这个非常基本的错误。
很简单，但它只是展示了一点时间和验证可以为页面做些什么。
但不仅仅是这个
反向链接
定期更新
也很重要
There are several reasons to make your website W3C valid.
Better chances for good rendering in different browsers.
Decrease dependency on error correction of browsers.
You could give a speed boost to your websites.
A small group of users values good coding. Especially if your target audience are webmasters and scripters.
I read a long while ago that bad code can kill off your site and this was the example given:
Lets say your first paragraph is written for the search engines but you have made this simple mistake -
<p This is the text from my first paragraph and I have written it for search engines while keeping it still readable to humans and good to read</p>
Notice I have accidentally not closed the start tag for the <p>
According to the article i read, the search engines will not be able to read the content as it is supposed to be and will be interpreted as being part of the tag and therefore ignored. this is obviously a really bad thing. So with this in mind, this very basic mistake can be fixed by validating the html.
Simple yet it just goes to show what a little time and validation can do for a page.
你永远无法100%确定。但是...如果您假设搜索引擎比无效 HTML 更好地解析有效 HTML，那么您应该尝试有效 HTML 是否有意义？尽管会提供其他好处，但如果您依靠第三方（搜索引擎世界）为您的公司提供收入，我希望让他们的工作尽可能简单和准确。
You can never be 100% sure. But ... if you assume the search engines parse valid HTML better than invalid HTML, doesn't it make sense that you should try for valid HTML? Despite the other benefits that would provide, if you're relying on a 3rd party (the search engine world) to provide revenue to your company I would want to make their job as easy and accurate as possible.
发布评论
评论（4）
SEO 就是关于目标关键词、如何布局网站、写作时要遵循的一些基本规则等等。最后，来自其他网站的高质量入站链接对于良好排名来说是最重要的。
网站验证被高估了。这本意是好的，但对于 SEO 来说却被高估了。您可能有视力障碍的受众或您必须验证的法规，但这对于入站链接没有多大作用。无论如何，我编写的大多数 HTML 都会进行验证，但我不会竭尽全力使其如此。
几乎每个浏览器都有一个“怪异”模式来处理所有旧的 html 代码。搜索引擎可以很好地理解 HTML 最基本的形式。
如果您为搜索引擎优化付费，您需要更好地定位关键字之类的方法。您可能会发现 SEO 快速入门值得一看，它是免费下载的（谷歌搜索），并且概述了良好的 SEO 过程是什么样的。
SEO is all about which keywords to target, how to layout a website, some basic rules to follow when writing, and that sort of thing. In the end quality inbound links from other web sites is what matters most for a good rank.
Website validation is overrated. It's well meaning, but overrated for SEO. You may have an audience that is visually impaired or regulations that you must validate, but this doesn't do much of anything for inbound links. Most HTML I write validates anyway, but I don't go out of my way to make it so.
Pretty much every browser has a "quirks" mode to deal with all the old html code out there. The most basic form of HTML is well understood by search engines.
If you're paying for SEO you want ways to better target keywords and that sort of thing. You may find SEO Fast Start worth a look, it's a free download (google it) and will give an overview of what a good SEO process looks like.
使您的网站 W3C 有效的原因有多种。
我很久以前就读到，糟糕的代码可能会毁掉你的网站，这就是给出的例子：
假设你的第一段是为搜索引擎编写的，但你犯了这个简单的错误 -
注意，我不小心没有关闭
< /code>
根据我阅读的文章，搜索引擎将无法按预期读取内容，并将被解释为标签的一部分，因此被忽略。这显然是一件非常糟糕的事情。因此，考虑到这一点，可以通过验证 html 来修复这个非常基本的错误。
很简单，但它只是展示了一点时间和验证可以为页面做些什么。
但不仅仅是这个
反向链接
定期更新
也很重要
There are several reasons to make your website W3C valid.
I read a long while ago that bad code can kill off your site and this was the example given:
Lets say your first paragraph is written for the search engines but you have made this simple mistake -
<p This is the text from my first paragraph and I have written it for search engines while keeping it still readable to humans and good to read</p>Notice I have accidentally not closed the start tag for the
<p>According to the article i read, the search engines will not be able to read the content as it is supposed to be and will be interpreted as being part of the tag and therefore ignored. this is obviously a really bad thing. So with this in mind, this very basic mistake can be fixed by validating the html.
Simple yet it just goes to show what a little time and validation can do for a page.
But not only this
Backlinks
regular update
is also important
证实？没那么多。但是损坏的 html，例如未关闭的表格肯定会造成一些损坏，尽管很小。
游戏仍然是关于入站链接的。花在构建入站单向链接上的时间比验证更有价值。
还需要一些时间来分析您的导航路径 - 保持链接具体，不要将页面嵌套得太深，并始终确保没有损坏的链接。
Validate? Not so much. But broken html, such as an unclosed table would definitely some damage, albeit minor.
The game is still about inbound links. Time spent building inbound one-way links is far more valuable than validation.
Also take some time to analyze your navigation paths - keep links concrete, don't nest pages too deep, and always ensure you have no broken links.
你永远无法100%确定。但是...如果您假设搜索引擎比无效 HTML 更好地解析有效 HTML，那么您应该尝试有效 HTML 是否有意义？尽管会提供其他好处，但如果您依靠第三方（搜索引擎世界）为您的公司提供收入，我希望让他们的工作尽可能简单和准确。
You can never be 100% sure. But ... if you assume the search engines parse valid HTML better than invalid HTML, doesn't it make sense that you should try for valid HTML? Despite the other benefits that would provide, if you're relying on a 3rd party (the search engine world) to provide revenue to your company I would want to make their job as easy and accurate as possible.