基本编程的模块化首先是在 Visual Basic 中出现的吗？
基本编程的模块化首先出现在 Visual Basic 中？是真是假？
Modularity of basic programming first appeared with visual basic? True or False?
如果你对这篇内容有疑问，欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论，获取更多帮助，或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。
绑定邮箱获取回复消息
由于您还没有绑定你的真实邮箱，如果其他用户或者作者回复了您的评论，将不能在第一时间通知您！
发布评论
评论（5）
假的，甚至 GW Basic & Quick Basic早于Visual Basic出现，具有模块化的特点。
False, even GW Basic & Quick Basic which have appeared before visual basic have modularity.
错误 - Gordon Eubanks 产品：CBasic（在 USS George Washington 上编写）首先从 IMSAI 获得，后来在 Digital Research Corp 大约 1981 年购买后从 Digital Research Corp 获得，参见 维基百科上的此条目了解更多信息。
False - Gordon Eubanks product: CBasic (written aboard USS George Washington) first available from IMSAI then later from Digital Research Corp after they bought it circa 1981 see this entry on wikipedia for more information.
QBasic（大概还有 QuickBasic）具有可以（或至少可以）与主程序分开查看和编辑的子例程和函数。虽然不是文件级模块化，但这确实是一个例子。
QBasic (and presumably QuickBasic) had subroutines and functions which were (or at least could be) viewed and edited separately from the main program. While not file-level modularity, that does stand as one example.
我见过早于 VB 的干净、模块化 BASIC 代码的示例。一般来说，您可以使用具有任何语法的任何编程方法，尽管某些语法鼓励特定的风格。 BASIC 语言的形式足够自由，以至于它所鼓励的风格往往是“混乱的”。多年来，Microsoft 一直致力于在 VB 中引入可促进更多结构的功能。
I've seen examples of clean, modular BASIC code that predate VB. In general, you can use any programming approach with any syntax, although some syntaxes encourage a particular style. The BASIC language is free-form enough that the style it tends to encourage is "messy". Over the years Microsoft has made an effort to introduce features in VB that promote more structure.
Microsoft 1989 年的 BASIC PDS 7.1 编译器（专业开发系统）非常模块化。您可以链接到 C 例程 &汇编例程（和 Fortran IIRC）。 Basic 本身允许调用其他 BASIC 例程作为子例程等。我今天还在用它。
Microsoft's BASIC PDS 7.1 compiler (Professional Development System) from 1989ish was very modular. You could link in C routines & Assembly routines (and Fortran IIRC). And the Basic itself allowed for calling other BASIC routines as sub-routines ect. I still use it today.