.NET 代码签名定价

发布于 2024-08-18 20:51:53 字数 835 浏览 4 评论 0 原文

我正在研究对我们公司的应用程序进行代码签名的选项,似乎有几个不同的提供商,例如:

每个提供商都有优点和缺点吗?或者它们都基本相同,我应该使用价格最便宜的那个?我的最终目标是让我的应用程序成为受信任的提供商,以便我们可以在没有 UAC 提示的情况下进行独立的用户更新。

注意:我知道已经有一个关于代码签名选项的问题在 StackOverflow 上,但我相信这个问题有点不同。

编辑:扩展选项列表,如下面的评论中所述。

I am looking into options for code signing our company's application, and it seems there are several different providers such as:

Are there pros and cons for each provider, or are they all basically the same and I should use the one with the cheapest price? My end goal is to have my application known as a trusted provider so that we can do stand-alone user updates without UAC prompts.

NOTE: I know there is already a question about Code Signing Options on StackOverflow, but I believe this question is a little different.

EDIT: Expanded list of options, as mentioned below in the comments.

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论(3

抱着落日 2024-08-25 20:51:53

归根结底,这并不重要。

因此,选择一款满足您的价格/声誉需求的产品。就我个人而言,我会选择最便宜的选择,因为你提到的三个已经存在很长时间了。


更新:

不需要额外的软件。采用率并不重要(而且你永远也找不到该信息)。相反,这些公司的声誉非常好,这才是重要的部分。

在评估密钥生成公司时,您想知道他们经营了多久,以及他们是否曾经丢失过密钥或被黑客攻击。

At the end of the day it doesn't really matter.

So, pick one that meets your price / reputation needs. Personally, I'd go with the cheapest option as the three you mentioned have been around a very long time.


UPDATE:

No additional software is required. Adoption rate isn't really important (and you'll never find that information anyway). Instead, the reputation of those companies is very good, and that's the part that matters.

When evaluating key generation companies, you want to know how long have they been in business, and, if they have ever lost a key or been hacked.

半山落雨半山空 2024-08-25 20:51:53

I don't know how everyone feels about their reputation, but GoDaddy also offers code signing certificates, and they appear to be significantly less expensive than the other options.

嗳卜坏 2024-08-25 20:51:53

如果您要发布商业应用程序并且有兴趣获取现场用户崩溃的报告,您应该查看是否 Windows 错误报告 (WER) 对您会有用。使用 WER 需要 Verisign 证书。

(“Windows 错误报告 (WER) 是一组 Windows 技术,用于捕获软件崩溃数据并支持最终用户报告崩溃信息。通过 Winqual 服务,软件和硬件供应商可以访问报告,以便分析和响应这些问题。 WER 技术在 Windows XP、Windows Server 2003 及更高版本中实现。”)

If you're releasing a commercial app and have an interest in getting reports from user crashes in the field you should look into whether Windows Error Reporting (WER) would be of use to you. Using WER requires a Verisign certificate.

("Windows Error Reporting (WER) is a set of Windows technologies that capture software crash data and support end-user reporting of crash information. Through Winqual services, software and hardware vendors can access reports in order to analyze and respond to these problems. WER technologies are implemented in Windows XP, Windows Server 2003, and later.")

~没有更多了~
我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
原文