C#:编译表达式时已添加具有相同键的项目

发布于 2024-08-18 13:15:12 字数 4548 浏览 3 评论 0 原文

好吧,这是一个棘手的问题。希望这里有一位表达大师能够发现我在这里做错了什么,因为我只是不明白。

我正在构建用于过滤查询的表达式。为了简化这个过程,我有几个 Expression> 扩展方法,使我的代码更干净,到目前为止它们工作得很好。我已经为所有这些测试编写了测试,除了一个测试,我今天为它编写了一个测试。该测试完全失败,并出现带有堆栈跟踪的ArgumentException。我就是不明白。特别是因为我已经在查询中成功使用该方法一段时间了!

无论如何,这是我在运行测试时得到的堆栈跟踪:

failed: System.ArgumentException : An item with the same key has already been added.
    at System.ThrowHelper.ThrowArgumentException(ExceptionResource resource)
    at System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary`2.Insert(TKey key, TValue value, Boolean add)
    at System.Linq.Expressions.ExpressionCompiler.PrepareInitLocal(ILGenerator gen, ParameterExpression p)
    at System.Linq.Expressions.ExpressionCompiler.GenerateInvoke(ILGenerator gen, InvocationExpression invoke, StackType ask)
    at System.Linq.Expressions.ExpressionCompiler.Generate(ILGenerator gen, Expression node, StackType ask)
    at System.Linq.Expressions.ExpressionCompiler.GenerateBinary(ILGenerator gen, BinaryExpression b, StackType ask)
    at System.Linq.Expressions.ExpressionCompiler.Generate(ILGenerator gen, Expression node, StackType ask)
    at System.Linq.Expressions.ExpressionCompiler.GenerateUnliftedAndAlso(ILGenerator gen, BinaryExpression b)
    at System.Linq.Expressions.ExpressionCompiler.GenerateAndAlso(ILGenerator gen, BinaryExpression b, StackType ask)
    at System.Linq.Expressions.ExpressionCompiler.GenerateBinary(ILGenerator gen, BinaryExpression b, StackType ask)
    at System.Linq.Expressions.ExpressionCompiler.Generate(ILGenerator gen, Expression node, StackType ask)
    at System.Linq.Expressions.ExpressionCompiler.GenerateUnliftedOrElse(ILGenerator gen, BinaryExpression b)
    at System.Linq.Expressions.ExpressionCompiler.GenerateOrElse(ILGenerator gen, BinaryExpression b, StackType ask)
    at System.Linq.Expressions.ExpressionCompiler.GenerateBinary(ILGenerator gen, BinaryExpression b, StackType ask)
    at System.Linq.Expressions.ExpressionCompiler.Generate(ILGenerator gen, Expression node, StackType ask)
    at System.Linq.Expressions.ExpressionCompiler.GenerateInvoke(ILGenerator gen, InvocationExpression invoke, StackType ask)
    at System.Linq.Expressions.ExpressionCompiler.Generate(ILGenerator gen, Expression node, StackType ask)
    at System.Linq.Expressions.ExpressionCompiler.GenerateUnliftedAndAlso(ILGenerator gen, BinaryExpression b)
    at System.Linq.Expressions.ExpressionCompiler.GenerateAndAlso(ILGenerator gen, BinaryExpression b, StackType ask)
    at System.Linq.Expressions.ExpressionCompiler.GenerateBinary(ILGenerator gen, BinaryExpression b, StackType ask)
    at System.Linq.Expressions.ExpressionCompiler.Generate(ILGenerator gen, Expression node, StackType ask)
    at System.Linq.Expressions.ExpressionCompiler.GenerateLambda(LambdaExpression lambda)
    at System.Linq.Expressions.ExpressionCompiler.CompileDynamicLambda(LambdaExpression lambda)
    at System.Linq.Expressions.Expression`1.Compile()
    PredicateTests.cs(257,0): at Namespace.ExpressionExtensionsTests.WhereWithin_CollectionIsFilteredAsExpected()

测试本身如下所示,它在编译语句处失败:

[Test]
public void WhereWithin_CollectionIsFilteredAsExpected()
{
    var range = new[] { Range.Create(2, 7), Range.Create(15, 18) };

    var predicate = Predicate
        .Create<int>(x => x % 2 == 0)
        .AndWithin(range, x => x)
        .Compile();

    var actual = Enumerable.Range(0, 20)
        .Where(predicate)
        .ToArray();

    Assert.That(actual, Is.EqualTo(new[] { 2, 4, 6, 16, 18 }));
}

我只是不明白错误消息。我认为这可能与我总是使用 x 作为参数名称有关,但当我尝试交换它们时似乎没有帮助。对我来说更奇怪的是,我已经在更大的 Linq2Sql 查询中使用这种确切的方法一段时间了,而且它们总是工作得很好。因此,在我的测试中,我尝试不编译表达式并使用 AsQueryable,这样我就可以使用它来代替。但这只是导致异常发生在 ToArray 上。这是怎么回事?我该如何解决这个问题?

您可以在 zip 文件中以下行找到令人反感且烦人的代码:


注意: 我已在此处发布了一些相关代码,但经过一些评论后,我决定将代码提取到自己的项目中,这样可以更清楚地显示异常。更重要的是,它可以运行、编译和调试。


更新:根据@Mark 的一些建议进一步简化了示例项目。就像删除范围类,而只是硬编码单个常量范围一样。还添加了另一个示例,其中使用完全相同的方法实际上效果很好。因此,使用 AndWithin 方法会使应用程序崩溃,而使用WhereWithin 方法实际上可以正常工作。我感觉自己一无所知!

Ok, here's a tricky one. Hopefully there is an expression guru here who can spot what I am doing wrong here, cause I am just not getting it.

I am building up expressions that I use to filter queries. To ease that process I have a couple of Expression<Func<T, bool>> extension methods that makes my code cleaner and so far they have been working nicely. I have written tests for all of them except one, which I wrote one for today. And that test fails completely with an ArgumentException with a long stack trace. And I just don't get it. Especially since I have been using that method for a while successfully in my queries!

Anyways, here is the stack trace I get when running the test:

failed: System.ArgumentException : An item with the same key has already been added.
    at System.ThrowHelper.ThrowArgumentException(ExceptionResource resource)
    at System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary`2.Insert(TKey key, TValue value, Boolean add)
    at System.Linq.Expressions.ExpressionCompiler.PrepareInitLocal(ILGenerator gen, ParameterExpression p)
    at System.Linq.Expressions.ExpressionCompiler.GenerateInvoke(ILGenerator gen, InvocationExpression invoke, StackType ask)
    at System.Linq.Expressions.ExpressionCompiler.Generate(ILGenerator gen, Expression node, StackType ask)
    at System.Linq.Expressions.ExpressionCompiler.GenerateBinary(ILGenerator gen, BinaryExpression b, StackType ask)
    at System.Linq.Expressions.ExpressionCompiler.Generate(ILGenerator gen, Expression node, StackType ask)
    at System.Linq.Expressions.ExpressionCompiler.GenerateUnliftedAndAlso(ILGenerator gen, BinaryExpression b)
    at System.Linq.Expressions.ExpressionCompiler.GenerateAndAlso(ILGenerator gen, BinaryExpression b, StackType ask)
    at System.Linq.Expressions.ExpressionCompiler.GenerateBinary(ILGenerator gen, BinaryExpression b, StackType ask)
    at System.Linq.Expressions.ExpressionCompiler.Generate(ILGenerator gen, Expression node, StackType ask)
    at System.Linq.Expressions.ExpressionCompiler.GenerateUnliftedOrElse(ILGenerator gen, BinaryExpression b)
    at System.Linq.Expressions.ExpressionCompiler.GenerateOrElse(ILGenerator gen, BinaryExpression b, StackType ask)
    at System.Linq.Expressions.ExpressionCompiler.GenerateBinary(ILGenerator gen, BinaryExpression b, StackType ask)
    at System.Linq.Expressions.ExpressionCompiler.Generate(ILGenerator gen, Expression node, StackType ask)
    at System.Linq.Expressions.ExpressionCompiler.GenerateInvoke(ILGenerator gen, InvocationExpression invoke, StackType ask)
    at System.Linq.Expressions.ExpressionCompiler.Generate(ILGenerator gen, Expression node, StackType ask)
    at System.Linq.Expressions.ExpressionCompiler.GenerateUnliftedAndAlso(ILGenerator gen, BinaryExpression b)
    at System.Linq.Expressions.ExpressionCompiler.GenerateAndAlso(ILGenerator gen, BinaryExpression b, StackType ask)
    at System.Linq.Expressions.ExpressionCompiler.GenerateBinary(ILGenerator gen, BinaryExpression b, StackType ask)
    at System.Linq.Expressions.ExpressionCompiler.Generate(ILGenerator gen, Expression node, StackType ask)
    at System.Linq.Expressions.ExpressionCompiler.GenerateLambda(LambdaExpression lambda)
    at System.Linq.Expressions.ExpressionCompiler.CompileDynamicLambda(LambdaExpression lambda)
    at System.Linq.Expressions.Expression`1.Compile()
    PredicateTests.cs(257,0): at Namespace.ExpressionExtensionsTests.WhereWithin_CollectionIsFilteredAsExpected()

The test itself looks like the following, an it fails at the Compile statement:

[Test]
public void WhereWithin_CollectionIsFilteredAsExpected()
{
    var range = new[] { Range.Create(2, 7), Range.Create(15, 18) };

    var predicate = Predicate
        .Create<int>(x => x % 2 == 0)
        .AndWithin(range, x => x)
        .Compile();

    var actual = Enumerable.Range(0, 20)
        .Where(predicate)
        .ToArray();

    Assert.That(actual, Is.EqualTo(new[] { 2, 4, 6, 16, 18 }));
}

I just don't understand the error message. I thought it might have to do with the fact that I always use x as the parameter name, but didn't seem to help when I tried to swap them around. What makes it even weirder to me is that I have been using this exact method for a while already in bigger Linq2Sql queries and they have always worked nicely. So in my test I tried to not compile the expression and use AsQueryable so I could use it on that instead. But that just made the exception occur on the ToArray instead. What is going on here? How can I fix this?

You can find the offending and annoying code in the zip file below the line:


Note: I had posted some of the related code here, but after some comments I decided to extract the code into it's own project which shows the exception more clearly. And more importantly, that can be run, compiled and debugged.


Update: Simplified the example project even further with some of the suggestions from @Mark. Like removing the range class and instead just hard coding single constant range. Also added another example where using the exact same method actually works fine. So, using the AndWithin method makes the app crash, while using the WhereWithin method actually works fine. I feel pretty much clueless!

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论(2

终陌 2024-08-25 13:15:12

我对您的方法进行了一些重构,以使编译器更满意:

public static Expression<Func<TSubject, bool>> AndWithin<TSubject, TField>(
    this Expression<Func<TSubject, bool>> original,
    IEnumerable<Range<TField>> range, Expression<Func<TSubject, TField>> field) where TField : IComparable<TField>
{
  return original.And(range.GetPredicateFor(field));
}


static Expression<Func<TSource, bool>> GetPredicateFor<TSource, TValue>
    (this IEnumerable<Range<TValue>> range, Expression<Func<TSource, TValue>> selector) where TValue : IComparable<TValue>
{
  var param = Expression.Parameter(typeof(TSource), "x");

  if (range == null || !range.Any())
    return Expression.Lambda<Func<TSource, bool>>(Expression.Constant(false), param);

  Expression body = null;
  foreach (var r in range)
  {
    Expression<Func<TValue, TValue, TValue, bool>> BT = (val, min, max) => val.CompareTo(min) >= 0 && val.CompareTo(max) <= 0;
    var newPart = Expression.Invoke(BT, param,
                                      Expression.Constant(r.Start, typeof(TValue)),
                                      Expression.Constant(r.End, typeof(TValue)));

    body = body == null ? newPart : (Expression)Expression.OrElse(body, newPart);
  }

  return Expression.Lambda<Func<TSource, bool>>(body, param);
}

两者都增加了 IComparable 限制(对第一个方法的唯一更改)。

在第二个中,我通过 Func 表达式实现进行比较,请注意 func 是在循环内创建的......这是第二次添加(它认为是相同的...... .) 正在爆炸的旧方法中的表达。

免责声明:我仍然不完全理解为什么你以前的方法不起作用,但这种替代方法绕过了这个问题。如果这不是您想要的,请告诉我,我们会尝试其他方法。

另外,对提出问题表示赞赏,示例项目堪称典范。

I refactored your methods a bit to make the compiler a bit happier:

public static Expression<Func<TSubject, bool>> AndWithin<TSubject, TField>(
    this Expression<Func<TSubject, bool>> original,
    IEnumerable<Range<TField>> range, Expression<Func<TSubject, TField>> field) where TField : IComparable<TField>
{
  return original.And(range.GetPredicateFor(field));
}


static Expression<Func<TSource, bool>> GetPredicateFor<TSource, TValue>
    (this IEnumerable<Range<TValue>> range, Expression<Func<TSource, TValue>> selector) where TValue : IComparable<TValue>
{
  var param = Expression.Parameter(typeof(TSource), "x");

  if (range == null || !range.Any())
    return Expression.Lambda<Func<TSource, bool>>(Expression.Constant(false), param);

  Expression body = null;
  foreach (var r in range)
  {
    Expression<Func<TValue, TValue, TValue, bool>> BT = (val, min, max) => val.CompareTo(min) >= 0 && val.CompareTo(max) <= 0;
    var newPart = Expression.Invoke(BT, param,
                                      Expression.Constant(r.Start, typeof(TValue)),
                                      Expression.Constant(r.End, typeof(TValue)));

    body = body == null ? newPart : (Expression)Expression.OrElse(body, newPart);
  }

  return Expression.Lambda<Func<TSource, bool>>(body, param);
}

Both have the added restriction of IComparable<TValue> (the only change to the first method).

In the second, I'm doing the comparison via a Func Expression implementation, notice that the func is created inside the loop...it's the second addition of this (what it thinks is the same...) expression in the old method that's blowing up.

Disclaimer: I still don't fully understand why your previous method didn't work, but this alternative approach bypasses the problem. Let me know if this isn't what you're after and we'll try something else.

Also, kudos on ASKING a question well, a sample project is exemplary.

画骨成沙 2024-08-25 13:15:12

这不是答案,但我希望它能帮助有人找到答案。我进一步简化了代码,使其只是一个文件,但仍然以同样的方式失败。我已重命名变量,以便“x”不会使用两次。我删除了 Range 类,并将其替换为硬编码常量 0 和 1。

using System;
using System.Linq;
using System.Linq.Expressions;

class Program
{
    static Expression<Func<int, bool>> And(Expression<Func<int, bool>> first,
                                           Expression<Func<int, bool>> second)
    {
        var x = Expression.Parameter(typeof(int), "x");
        var body = Expression.AndAlso(Expression.Invoke(first, x), Expression.Invoke(second, x));
        return Expression.Lambda<Func<int, bool>>(body, x);
    }

    static Expression<Func<int, bool>> GetPredicateFor(Expression<Func<int, int>> selector)
    {
        var param = Expression.Parameter(typeof(int), "y");
        var member = Expression.Invoke(selector, param);

        Expression body =
            Expression.AndAlso(
                Expression.GreaterThanOrEqual(member, Expression.Constant(0, typeof(int))),
                Expression.LessThanOrEqual(member, Expression.Constant(1, typeof(int))));

        return Expression.Lambda<Func<int, bool>>(body, param);
    }

    static void Main()
    {
        Expression<Func<int, bool>> predicate = a => true;
        predicate = And(predicate, GetPredicateFor(b => b)); // Comment out this line and it will run without error
        var z = predicate.Compile();
    }
}

表达式在调试器中如下所示:

x => (Invoke(a => True,x) && Invoke(y => ((Invoke(b => b,y) >= 0) && (Invoke(b => b,y) <= 1)),x))

更新:我已将其简化为最简单的状态抛出相同的异常:

using System;
using System.Linq;
using System.Linq.Expressions;

class Program
{
    static void Main()
    {
        Expression<Func<int, bool>> selector = b => true;
        ParameterExpression param = Expression.Parameter(typeof(int), "y");
        InvocationExpression member = Expression.Invoke(selector, param);
        Expression body = Expression.AndAlso(member, member);
        Expression<Func<int, bool>> predicate = Expression.Lambda<Func<int, bool>>(body, param);
        var z = predicate.Compile();
    }
}

This is not an answer, but I hope it will help someone find the answer. I've simplified the code further so that it is just one single file and still fails in the same way. I have renamed the variables so that "x" is not used twice. I have removed the Range class and replaced it with hardcoded constants 0 and 1.

using System;
using System.Linq;
using System.Linq.Expressions;

class Program
{
    static Expression<Func<int, bool>> And(Expression<Func<int, bool>> first,
                                           Expression<Func<int, bool>> second)
    {
        var x = Expression.Parameter(typeof(int), "x");
        var body = Expression.AndAlso(Expression.Invoke(first, x), Expression.Invoke(second, x));
        return Expression.Lambda<Func<int, bool>>(body, x);
    }

    static Expression<Func<int, bool>> GetPredicateFor(Expression<Func<int, int>> selector)
    {
        var param = Expression.Parameter(typeof(int), "y");
        var member = Expression.Invoke(selector, param);

        Expression body =
            Expression.AndAlso(
                Expression.GreaterThanOrEqual(member, Expression.Constant(0, typeof(int))),
                Expression.LessThanOrEqual(member, Expression.Constant(1, typeof(int))));

        return Expression.Lambda<Func<int, bool>>(body, param);
    }

    static void Main()
    {
        Expression<Func<int, bool>> predicate = a => true;
        predicate = And(predicate, GetPredicateFor(b => b)); // Comment out this line and it will run without error
        var z = predicate.Compile();
    }
}

The expression looks like this in the debugger:

x => (Invoke(a => True,x) && Invoke(y => ((Invoke(b => b,y) >= 0) && (Invoke(b => b,y) <= 1)),x))

Update: I've simplified it down to about the most simple it can be while still throwing the same exception:

using System;
using System.Linq;
using System.Linq.Expressions;

class Program
{
    static void Main()
    {
        Expression<Func<int, bool>> selector = b => true;
        ParameterExpression param = Expression.Parameter(typeof(int), "y");
        InvocationExpression member = Expression.Invoke(selector, param);
        Expression body = Expression.AndAlso(member, member);
        Expression<Func<int, bool>> predicate = Expression.Lambda<Func<int, bool>>(body, param);
        var z = predicate.Compile();
    }
}
~没有更多了~
我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
原文