生成三角/六角坐标 (xyz)

发布于 2024-08-17 18:07:10 字数 1019 浏览 4 评论 0原文

我试图提出一个迭代函数来生成六角形网格的 xyz 坐标。使用起始六边形位置(为简单起见,假设为 0,0,0),我想计算每个连续的六边形“环”的坐标,如下所示:

到目前为止,我所能想到的就是这个(javascript 中的示例):

var radius = 3
var xyz = [0,0,0];

// for each ring
for (var i = 0; i < radius; i++) {
    var tpRing = i*6;
    var tpVect = tpRing/3;
    // for each vector of ring
    for (var j = 0; j < 3; j++) {
        // for each tile in vector
        for(var k = 0; k < tpVect; k++) {
            xyz[0] = ???;
            xyz[1] = ???;
            xyz[2] = ???;
            console.log(xyz);
        }
    }
}

我知道每个环比前一个环多包含 6 个点,并且每个 120° 向量对于从中心。我还知道所有图块的 x + y + z = 0 。但是如何生成遵循以下顺序的坐标列表呢?

    0, 0, 0

    0,-1, 1
    1,-1, 0
    1, 0,-1
    0, 1,-1
   -1, 1, 0
   -1, 0, 1

    0,-2, 2
    1,-2, 1
    2,-2, 0
    2,-1,-1
    2, 0,-2
    1, 1,-2
    0, 2,-2
   -1, 2,-1
   -2, 2, 0
   -2, 1, 1
   -2, 0, 2
   -1,-1, 2

I'm trying to come up with an iterative function that generates xyz coordinates for a hexagonal grid. With a starting hex position (say 0,0,0 for simplicity), I want to calculate the coordinates for each successive "ring" of hexagons, as illustrated here:

So far, all I've managed to come up with is this (example in javascript):

var radius = 3
var xyz = [0,0,0];

// for each ring
for (var i = 0; i < radius; i++) {
    var tpRing = i*6;
    var tpVect = tpRing/3;
    // for each vector of ring
    for (var j = 0; j < 3; j++) {
        // for each tile in vector
        for(var k = 0; k < tpVect; k++) {
            xyz[0] = ???;
            xyz[1] = ???;
            xyz[2] = ???;
            console.log(xyz);
        }
    }
}

I know each ring contains six more points than the previous and each 120° vector contains one additional point for each step from the center. I also know that x + y + z = 0 for all tiles. But how can I generate a list of coordinates that follow the sequence below?

    0, 0, 0

    0,-1, 1
    1,-1, 0
    1, 0,-1
    0, 1,-1
   -1, 1, 0
   -1, 0, 1

    0,-2, 2
    1,-2, 1
    2,-2, 0
    2,-1,-1
    2, 0,-2
    1, 1,-2
    0, 2,-2
   -1, 2,-1
   -2, 2, 0
   -2, 1, 1
   -2, 0, 2
   -1,-1, 2

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论(5

末骤雨初歇 2024-08-24 18:07:11

这是一个有趣的谜题。

O(radius2),但(希望)比 Ofri 的风格更多一些 我突然想到,可以像使用方向(移动)向量绕环“行走”一样生成坐标,并且转动相当于围绕移动向量移动零。

此版本还比 Eric 的解决方案 具有优势,因为它从不触及无效坐标(Eric 的解决方案拒绝它们,但这个解决方案从不涉及无效坐标)甚至必须测试它们)。

# enumerate coords in rings 1..n-1; this doesn't work for the origin
for ring in range(1,4):
    # start in the upper right corner ...
    (x,y,z) = (0,-ring,ring)
    # ... moving clockwise (south-east, or +x,-z)
    move = [1,0,-1]         

    # each ring has six more coordinates than the last
    for i in range(6*ring):
        # print first to get the starting hex for this ring
        print "%d/%d: (%d,%d,%d) " % (ring,i,x,y,z)
        # then move to the next hex
        (x,y,z) = map(sum, zip((x,y,z), move))

        # when a coordinate has a zero in it, we're in a corner of
        # the ring, so we need to turn right
        if 0 in (x,y,z):
            # left shift the zero through the move vector for a
            # right turn
            i = move.index(0)
            (move[i-1],move[i]) = (move[i],move[i-1])

    print # blank line between rings

为 python 的序列切片欢呼三声。

This was a fun puzzle.

O(radius2) but with (hopefully) a bit more style than Ofri's solution. It occurred to me that coordinates could be generated as though you were "walking" around the ring using a direction (move) vector, and that a turn was equivalent to shifting the zero around the move vector.

This version also has the advantage over Eric's solution in that it never touches on invalid coordinates (Eric's rejects them, but this one never even has to test them).

# enumerate coords in rings 1..n-1; this doesn't work for the origin
for ring in range(1,4):
    # start in the upper right corner ...
    (x,y,z) = (0,-ring,ring)
    # ... moving clockwise (south-east, or +x,-z)
    move = [1,0,-1]         

    # each ring has six more coordinates than the last
    for i in range(6*ring):
        # print first to get the starting hex for this ring
        print "%d/%d: (%d,%d,%d) " % (ring,i,x,y,z)
        # then move to the next hex
        (x,y,z) = map(sum, zip((x,y,z), move))

        # when a coordinate has a zero in it, we're in a corner of
        # the ring, so we need to turn right
        if 0 in (x,y,z):
            # left shift the zero through the move vector for a
            # right turn
            i = move.index(0)
            (move[i-1],move[i]) = (move[i],move[i-1])

    print # blank line between rings

Three cheers for python's sequence slicing.

小帐篷 2024-08-24 18:07:11
const canvas = document.getElementById('canvas');
const ctx = canvas.getContext('2d');
ctx.textAlign = "center";

const radius = 20;
const altitude = Math.sqrt(3) * radius;
const total = 3;
for (let x = -total; x <= total; x++) {
    let y1 = Math.max(-total, -x-total);
    let y2 = Math.min(total, -x+total);
    for (let y = y1; y <= y2; y++) {
        let xx = x * altitude + Math.cos(1/3*Math.PI) * y * altitude;
        let yy = y * radius * 1.5;
        xx += canvas.width/2;
        yy += canvas.height/2;
        drawHex(xx, yy, radius);
        ctx.fillText(x+","+y, xx, yy);
    }
}

function drawHex(x, y, radius){
    ctx.beginPath();
    for(let a = 0; a < Math.PI*2; a+=Math.PI/3){
        let xx = Math.sin(a) * radius + x;
        let yy = Math.cos(a) * radius + y;
        if(a == 0) ctx.moveTo(xx, yy);
        else ctx.lineTo(xx, yy);
    }
    ctx.stroke();
}
<canvas id="canvas" width=250 height=250>

const canvas = document.getElementById('canvas');
const ctx = canvas.getContext('2d');
ctx.textAlign = "center";

const radius = 20;
const altitude = Math.sqrt(3) * radius;
const total = 3;
for (let x = -total; x <= total; x++) {
    let y1 = Math.max(-total, -x-total);
    let y2 = Math.min(total, -x+total);
    for (let y = y1; y <= y2; y++) {
        let xx = x * altitude + Math.cos(1/3*Math.PI) * y * altitude;
        let yy = y * radius * 1.5;
        xx += canvas.width/2;
        yy += canvas.height/2;
        drawHex(xx, yy, radius);
        ctx.fillText(x+","+y, xx, yy);
    }
}

function drawHex(x, y, radius){
    ctx.beginPath();
    for(let a = 0; a < Math.PI*2; a+=Math.PI/3){
        let xx = Math.sin(a) * radius + x;
        let yy = Math.cos(a) * radius + y;
        if(a == 0) ctx.moveTo(xx, yy);
        else ctx.lineTo(xx, yy);
    }
    ctx.stroke();
}
<canvas id="canvas" width=250 height=250>

未蓝澄海的烟 2024-08-24 18:07:11

在尝试了这两个选项之后,我选择了 Ofri 的解决方案,因为它速度稍快一些,并且可以轻松提供初始偏移值。我的代码现在如下所示:

var xyz = [-2,2,0];
var radius = 16;
var deltas = [[1,0,-1],[0,1,-1],[-1,1,0],[-1,0,1],[0,-1,1],[1,-1,0]];
for(var i = 0; i < radius; i++) {
        var x = xyz[0];
        var y = xyz[1]-i;
        var z = xyz[2]+i;
        for(var j = 0; j < 6; j++) {
                for(var k = 0; k < i; k++) {
                        x = x+deltas[j][0]
                        y = y+deltas[j][1]
                        z = z+deltas[j][2]
                        placeTile([x,y,z]);
                }
        }
}

placeTile 方法使用 cloneNode 复制预定义的 SVG 元素,每个图块的执行时间大约为 0.5 毫秒,这已经足够好了。非常感谢 tehMick 和 Ofri 的帮助!

After trying both the options, I've settled on Ofri's solution as it is a tiny bit faster and made it easy to provide an initial offset value. My code now looks like this:

var xyz = [-2,2,0];
var radius = 16;
var deltas = [[1,0,-1],[0,1,-1],[-1,1,0],[-1,0,1],[0,-1,1],[1,-1,0]];
for(var i = 0; i < radius; i++) {
        var x = xyz[0];
        var y = xyz[1]-i;
        var z = xyz[2]+i;
        for(var j = 0; j < 6; j++) {
                for(var k = 0; k < i; k++) {
                        x = x+deltas[j][0]
                        y = y+deltas[j][1]
                        z = z+deltas[j][2]
                        placeTile([x,y,z]);
                }
        }
}

The placeTile method uses cloneNode to copy a predefined SVG element, and it takes approx 0.5ms per tile to execute which is more than good enough. A big thanks to tehMick and Ofri for your help!

灼痛 2024-08-24 18:07:10

不仅是x + y + z = 0,而且x、y和z的绝对值都等于环半径的两倍。这应该足以识别每个连续环上的每个六边形:

var radius = 4;
for(var i = 0; i < radius; i++)
{
    for(var j = -i; j <= i; j++)
    for(var k = -i; k <= i; k++)
    for(var l = -i; l <= i; l++)
        if(Math.abs(j) + Math.abs(k) + Math.abs(l) == i*2 && j + k + l == 0)
            console.log(j + "," + k + "," + l);
    console.log("");
}

Not only is x + y + z = 0, but the absolute values of x, y and z are equal to twice the radius of the ring. This should be sufficient to identify every hexagon on each successive ring:

var radius = 4;
for(var i = 0; i < radius; i++)
{
    for(var j = -i; j <= i; j++)
    for(var k = -i; k <= i; k++)
    for(var l = -i; l <= i; l++)
        if(Math.abs(j) + Math.abs(k) + Math.abs(l) == i*2 && j + k + l == 0)
            console.log(j + "," + k + "," + l);
    console.log("");
}

以酷 2024-08-24 18:07:10

另一种可能的解决方案,运行时间为 O(radius2),与 O(radius4) 不同a href="https://stackoverflow.com/a/2049274/241211">tehMick 的解决方案(以牺牲大量风格为代价)是这样的:

radius = 4
for r in range(radius):
    print "radius %d" % r
    x = 0
    y = -r
    z = +r
    print x,y,z
    for i in range(r):
        x = x+1
        z = z-1
        print x,y,z
    for i in range(r):
        y = y+1
        z = z-1
        print x,y,z
    for i in range(r):
        x = x-1
        y = y+1
        print x,y,z
    for i in range(r):
        x = x-1
        z = z+1
        print x,y,z
    for i in range(r):
        y = y-1
        z = z+1
        print x,y,z
    for i in range(r-1):
        x = x+1
        y = y-1
        print x,y,z

或者写得更简洁一点:

radius = 4
deltas = [[1,0,-1],[0,1,-1],[-1,1,0],[-1,0,1],[0,-1,1],[1,-1,0]]
for r in range(radius):
    print "radius %d" % r
    x = 0
    y = -r
    z = +r
    print x,y,z
    for j in range(6):
        if j==5:
            num_of_hexas_in_edge = r-1
        else:
            num_of_hexas_in_edge = r
        for i in range(num_of_hexas_in_edge):
            x = x+deltas[j][0]
            y = y+deltas[j][1]
            z = z+deltas[j][2]            
            print x,y,z

它的灵感来自于事实六边形实际上位于六边形本身的外部,因此您可以找到其中 1 个点的坐标,然后通过移动其 6 条边来计算其他点的坐标。

Another possible solution, that runs in O(radius2), unlike the O(radius4) of tehMick's solution (at the expense of a lot of style) is this:

radius = 4
for r in range(radius):
    print "radius %d" % r
    x = 0
    y = -r
    z = +r
    print x,y,z
    for i in range(r):
        x = x+1
        z = z-1
        print x,y,z
    for i in range(r):
        y = y+1
        z = z-1
        print x,y,z
    for i in range(r):
        x = x-1
        y = y+1
        print x,y,z
    for i in range(r):
        x = x-1
        z = z+1
        print x,y,z
    for i in range(r):
        y = y-1
        z = z+1
        print x,y,z
    for i in range(r-1):
        x = x+1
        y = y-1
        print x,y,z

or written a little more concisely:

radius = 4
deltas = [[1,0,-1],[0,1,-1],[-1,1,0],[-1,0,1],[0,-1,1],[1,-1,0]]
for r in range(radius):
    print "radius %d" % r
    x = 0
    y = -r
    z = +r
    print x,y,z
    for j in range(6):
        if j==5:
            num_of_hexas_in_edge = r-1
        else:
            num_of_hexas_in_edge = r
        for i in range(num_of_hexas_in_edge):
            x = x+deltas[j][0]
            y = y+deltas[j][1]
            z = z+deltas[j][2]            
            print x,y,z

It's inspired by the fact the hexagons are actually on the exterior of a hexagon themselves, so you can find the coordinates of 1 of its points, and then calculate the others by moving on its 6 edges.

~没有更多了~
我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
原文