使用 TOP 和 Between 时,Linq to SQL 提供不同的结果

发布于 2024-08-16 10:56:04 字数 4365 浏览 8 评论 0原文

我正在使用 Linq to Sql (实际上它是 Dynamic Linq to SQL,允许您在运行时为 where 子句、orderby 等传递字符串)但是我得到了一些不同的结果,它似乎基于底层 T 是否-SQL 使用 TOP 关键字或使用 BETWEEN。

我尝试将问题分解为一个小示例,场景如下:

我正在使用存储库模式和以下方法,该方法只需使用左外连接来连接 2 个表。

   public IQueryable<TestGalleryViewModel> FetchGalleryItems()
    {

        var galleryItems = from painting in Gallery
                           join artist in Artists
                               on painting.ArtistID equals artist.ArtistID

                           into paintingArtists
                           from artist in paintingArtists.DefaultIfEmpty()

                           select new TestGalleryViewModel
                           {

                               Id = painting.PaintingID,
                               ArtistName = artist == default(Artist) ? "" : artist.Surname + " " + artist.Forenames,
                           };

        return galleryItems;
    }

然后,我有一个使用 FetchGalleryItems 方法的小测试方法:

        var query = respository.Test_FetchGalleryItems().Where("ArtistName.Contains(\"Adams Charles James\")");

        var orderedlist = query.OrderBy("ArtistName asc");
        var page1 = orderedlist.Skip(0).Take(5);
        var page2 = orderedlist.Skip(5).Take(5);

OrderedList 包含以下基础值:

176 ADAMS Charles James
620 ADAMS Charles James
621 ADAMS Charles James
660 ADAMS Charles James
683 ADAMS Charles James
707 ADAMS Charles James
735 ADAMS Charles James
739 ADAMS Charles James
740 ADAMS Charles James
741 ADAMS Charles James

这是我所期望的。但是 page1 包含的

707 ADAMS Charles James
683 ADAMS Charles James
660 ADAMS Charles James
621 ADAMS Charles James
620 ADAMS Charles James

内容如您所见不是前 5 项。 Page2 包含

707 ADAMS Charles James
735 ADAMS Charles James
739 ADAMS Charles James
740 ADAMS Charles James
741 ADAMS Charles James

Whis 是我所期望的,它是第 6 到 10 项。

page1 的基础 T-SQL 是

SELECT TOP (5) [t3].[PaintingID] AS [Id], [t3].[value] AS [ArtistName]
FROM (
    SELECT [t0].[PaintingID], 
        (CASE 
            WHEN [t2].[test] IS NULL THEN CONVERT(NVarChar(101),'')
            ELSE ([t2].[Surname] + ' ') + [t2].[Forenames]
         END) AS [value]
    FROM [dbo].[Gallery] AS [t0]
    LEFT OUTER JOIN (
        SELECT 1 AS [test], [t1].[ArtistID], [t1].[Surname], [t1].[Forenames]
        FROM [dbo].[Artists] AS [t1]
        ) AS [t2] ON [t0].[ArtistID] = ([t2].[ArtistID])
    ) AS [t3]
WHERE [t3].[value] LIKE '%Adams Charles James%'
ORDER BY [t3].[value]

注意它使用 TOP(5)

page2 的基础 T-SQL 是

SELECT [t4].[PaintingID] AS [Id], [t4].[value] AS [ArtistName]
FROM (
    SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY [t3].[value], [t3].[Surname], [t3].[Forenames]) AS [ROW_NUMBER], [t3].[PaintingID], [t3].[value]
    FROM (
        SELECT [t0].[PaintingID], 
            (CASE 
                WHEN [t2].[test] IS NULL THEN CONVERT(NVarChar(101),'')
                ELSE ([t2].[Surname] + ' ') + [t2].[Forenames]
             END) AS [value], [t2].[Surname], [t2].[Forenames]
        FROM [dbo].[Gallery] AS [t0]
        LEFT OUTER JOIN (
            SELECT 1 AS [test], [t1].[ArtistID], [t1].[Surname], [t1].[Forenames]
            FROM [dbo].[Artists] AS [t1]
            ) AS [t2] ON [t0].[ArtistID] = ([t2].[ArtistID])
        ) AS [t3]
    WHERE [t3].[value] LIKE '%Adams Charles James%'
    ) AS [t4]
WHERE [t4].[ROW_NUMBER] BETWEEN 5 + 1 AND 5 + 5
ORDER BY [t4].[ROW_NUMBER]

注意它使用 BETWEEN

当我将 T-SQL 命令粘贴到 SQL Express Management Studio 中时,我得到了我所描述的结果。如果我使用 page2 T-SQL 并将该行修改

 WHERE [t4].[ROW_NUMBER] BETWEEN 5 + 1 AND 5 + 5

为,

WHERE [t4].[ROW_NUMBER] BETWEEN 1 AND 5

我会得到我期望的 page1 结果。即前 5 项。

176 ADAMS Charles James
620 ADAMS Charles James
621 ADAMS Charles James
660 ADAMS Charles James
683 ADAMS Charles James

简而言之,当 T-SQL 使用 Between 而不是 TOP 时,我得到了我预期的结果。

我在我的应用程序中使用过滤(where 子句)、排序(orderBy)和分页(跳过和获取),并且需要相当通用地处理这个问题。

  • 有没有办法强制使用 LINQ BETWEEN 语法而不是 顶部
  • 我应该接近这个吗 不同?

对于这么长的帖子表示歉意。

问候, 西蒙

I'm using Linq to Sql (in fact it's Dynamic Linq to SQL that allows you to pass strings at runtime for where clauses, orderby etc.) But I'm getting some different results and it seems to be based on whether the underlying T-SQL is using the TOP keyword or using BETWEEN.

I've tried to the break the problem down into a small example, here's the scenario:

I'm using a repository pattern and the following method that simply joins 2 tables with a left outer join.

   public IQueryable<TestGalleryViewModel> FetchGalleryItems()
    {

        var galleryItems = from painting in Gallery
                           join artist in Artists
                               on painting.ArtistID equals artist.ArtistID

                           into paintingArtists
                           from artist in paintingArtists.DefaultIfEmpty()

                           select new TestGalleryViewModel
                           {

                               Id = painting.PaintingID,
                               ArtistName = artist == default(Artist) ? "" : artist.Surname + " " + artist.Forenames,
                           };

        return galleryItems;
    }

I then have a little test method that uses the FetchGalleryItems method:

        var query = respository.Test_FetchGalleryItems().Where("ArtistName.Contains(\"Adams Charles James\")");

        var orderedlist = query.OrderBy("ArtistName asc");
        var page1 = orderedlist.Skip(0).Take(5);
        var page2 = orderedlist.Skip(5).Take(5);

The orderedList contains the following underlying values:

176 ADAMS Charles James
620 ADAMS Charles James
621 ADAMS Charles James
660 ADAMS Charles James
683 ADAMS Charles James
707 ADAMS Charles James
735 ADAMS Charles James
739 ADAMS Charles James
740 ADAMS Charles James
741 ADAMS Charles James

Which is what I would expect. But page1 contains

707 ADAMS Charles James
683 ADAMS Charles James
660 ADAMS Charles James
621 ADAMS Charles James
620 ADAMS Charles James

Which as you can see is NOT the first 5 items. Page2 contains

707 ADAMS Charles James
735 ADAMS Charles James
739 ADAMS Charles James
740 ADAMS Charles James
741 ADAMS Charles James

Whis is what I would expect, it is items 6 to 10.

The underlying T-SQL for page1 is

SELECT TOP (5) [t3].[PaintingID] AS [Id], [t3].[value] AS [ArtistName]
FROM (
    SELECT [t0].[PaintingID], 
        (CASE 
            WHEN [t2].[test] IS NULL THEN CONVERT(NVarChar(101),'')
            ELSE ([t2].[Surname] + ' ') + [t2].[Forenames]
         END) AS [value]
    FROM [dbo].[Gallery] AS [t0]
    LEFT OUTER JOIN (
        SELECT 1 AS [test], [t1].[ArtistID], [t1].[Surname], [t1].[Forenames]
        FROM [dbo].[Artists] AS [t1]
        ) AS [t2] ON [t0].[ArtistID] = ([t2].[ArtistID])
    ) AS [t3]
WHERE [t3].[value] LIKE '%Adams Charles James%'
ORDER BY [t3].[value]

Notice it's using TOP(5)

The underlying T-SQL for page2 is

SELECT [t4].[PaintingID] AS [Id], [t4].[value] AS [ArtistName]
FROM (
    SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY [t3].[value], [t3].[Surname], [t3].[Forenames]) AS [ROW_NUMBER], [t3].[PaintingID], [t3].[value]
    FROM (
        SELECT [t0].[PaintingID], 
            (CASE 
                WHEN [t2].[test] IS NULL THEN CONVERT(NVarChar(101),'')
                ELSE ([t2].[Surname] + ' ') + [t2].[Forenames]
             END) AS [value], [t2].[Surname], [t2].[Forenames]
        FROM [dbo].[Gallery] AS [t0]
        LEFT OUTER JOIN (
            SELECT 1 AS [test], [t1].[ArtistID], [t1].[Surname], [t1].[Forenames]
            FROM [dbo].[Artists] AS [t1]
            ) AS [t2] ON [t0].[ArtistID] = ([t2].[ArtistID])
        ) AS [t3]
    WHERE [t3].[value] LIKE '%Adams Charles James%'
    ) AS [t4]
WHERE [t4].[ROW_NUMBER] BETWEEN 5 + 1 AND 5 + 5
ORDER BY [t4].[ROW_NUMBER]

Notice it's using BETWEEN

When I paste the T-SQL commands into SQL Express Management Studio I get the results I've described. If I used the page2 T-SQL and amended the line

 WHERE [t4].[ROW_NUMBER] BETWEEN 5 + 1 AND 5 + 5

to be

WHERE [t4].[ROW_NUMBER] BETWEEN 1 AND 5

I get the results I was expecting for page1. i.e. The first 5 items.

176 ADAMS Charles James
620 ADAMS Charles James
621 ADAMS Charles James
660 ADAMS Charles James
683 ADAMS Charles James

So in a nutshell when the T-SQL uses Between instead of TOP I get the results I expected.

I'm using filtering (where clause), sorting (orderBy) and paging (skip and take) all over my app and need to handle this fairly generically.

  • Is there a way to force LINQ to use
    the BETWEEN syntax instead of
    TOP ?
  • Should I be approaching this
    differently ?

Apologies for the long post.

Regards,
Simon

如果你对这篇内容有疑问,欢迎到本站社区发帖提问 参与讨论,获取更多帮助,或者扫码二维码加入 Web 技术交流群。

扫码二维码加入Web技术交流群

发布评论

需要 登录 才能够评论, 你可以免费 注册 一个本站的账号。

评论(1

2024-08-23 10:56:04

无论 SQL 是如何生成的(LINQ 或其他方式),如果您 ORDER BY 具有重复值的列,则每次运行查询时都会得到不同的结果。

当您ORDER BY [t3].[value]时,您正在对包含许多重复值的列进行排序。

您可以通过从 Management Studio 运行一个非常简单的 SQL SELECT 来测试这一点。每次运行它,您都会得到不同的结果。

获得一致结果的一种方法是像您所做的那样使用 ROW_NUMBER。或者,向 ORDER BY 添加唯一的任何其他列将导致结果始终以相同的顺序返回。其他列是否与您的查询有任何关系并不重要,重要的是它是唯一的。

Regardless of how the SQL is generated (LINQ or otherwise), if you ORDER BY a column that has duplicate values, you can get different results every time you run the query.

When you ORDER BY [t3].[value] you are sorting on a column containing many duplicate values.

You can test this by running a very simple SQL SELECT from Management Studio. Every time you run it, you'll get a different result.

One way to get consistent results is to use ROW_NUMBER as you have done. Alternately, adding any other column to the ORDER BY that is unique will cause the results to always be returned in the same order. It doesn't matter whether that other column has anything to do with your query, just that it's unique.

~没有更多了~
我们使用 Cookies 和其他技术来定制您的体验包括您的登录状态等。通过阅读我们的 隐私政策 了解更多相关信息。 单击 接受 或继续使用网站,即表示您同意使用 Cookies 和您的相关数据。
原文